Environmental certification in a differentiated duopoly

References

• Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amacher, G. S., Koskela, E., &Ollikainen, M. (2004). Environmental quality competition and eco-labelling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(2), 284–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00078-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, F. J., González, P., &Porteiro, N. (2009). Strategic quality competition and the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baksi, S., &Bose, P. (2007). Credence goods, efficient labelling policies, and regulatory enforcement. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(2), 411–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9032-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baksi, S., Bose, P., &Xiang, D. (2017). Credence goods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(2), 377–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, A., Siedlecki, R., Prędkiewicz, P., Gazzola, P., Ryszawska, B., &Ucieklak-Jeż, P. (2019). Hospitals' financial health in rural and urban areas in Poland. Sustainability, 11(7), 1932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonroy, O., &Constantatos, C. (2015). On the economics of labels: How their introduction affects the functioning of markets and the welfare of all participants. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 239–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottega, L., &de Freitas, J.(2009). Public, private and nonprofit regulation for environmental quality. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brécard, D. (2017). Consumer misperception of eco-labels, green market structure and welfare. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 51(3), 340–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9328-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemenz, G. (2010). Eco-labeling and horizontal product differentiation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9324-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, K. (2005). Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environmental & Resource Economics, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-6977-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, M. R., &Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/466756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S. (2016). Certification under oligopolistic competition. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65(1), 251–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9903-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulleck, U., &Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/002205106776162717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuba, S., Cierniak-Emerych, A., Michalski, G., Poulová, P., Mohelská, H., &Klímová, B. (2019). The use of the internet by older adults in Poland. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00700-y
   Google Scholar
• Emons, W. E. (1997). Credence goods and fraudulent experts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 28(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2555942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emons, W. E. (2001). Credence goods monopolists. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(3–4), 375–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., Lee, S. H., &Matsumura, T. (2017). Environmental corporate social responsibility: A note on the first-mover advantage under price competition. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., &Tampieri, A. (2012). Vertical differentiation in a Cournot industry: The Porter hypothesis and beyond. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., &van’t Veld, K.(2015). Green, greener, greenest: Eco-label gradation and competition. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 72, 164–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. C., Wang, L., &Lee, S. H. (2015). Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters, 129, 108–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C. F. (2011). Eco-labeling and market equilibria with noisy certification tests. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(4), 537–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9402-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski, G., Blendinger, G., Rozsa, Z., Cierniak-Emerych, A., Svidronova, M., Buleca, J., &Bulsara, H.(2018). Can we determine debt to equity levels in non-profit organisations? Answer based on polish case. Engineering Economics, 29(5), 526–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.5.19666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neven, D., &Thisse, J. F. (1990). On quality and variety competition. InJ. Gabszewicz, J. F. Richard,&L. Wolsey(Eds.), Economic decision making: Games, econometrics and optimization. Contributions in Honour of Jacques Dréze.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, R., &Saha, B. (2015). Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 19–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, P., Masquelier, F., &Michalski, G.(2018). Towards treasury 4.0/The evolving role of corporate treasury management for 2020. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 23(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi/2018.23.2.189
   Google Scholar
• Poret, S. (2019). Label wars: Competition among NGOs as sustainability standard setters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 160, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, B., &Sheldon, I. (2007). Credence good labeling: The efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(4), 1020–1033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolinsky, A. (1993). Competition in a market for in-formed experts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 24(3), 380–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2555964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolinsky, A. (1995). Competition in markets for credence goods. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 151, 117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M., Tan, T., &Wang, X. (2019). Environmental R&D subsidy, spillovers and privatization in a mixed duopoly. Economic Research-EkonomskaIstraživanja, 32(1), 2989–3015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zago, A. M., &Pick, D. (2004). Labeling policies in food markets: Private incentives, public intervention, and welfare effects. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 29(1), 150–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar