IFRS 9 transition effect on equity in a post bank recovery environment: the case of Slovenia

References

• Abad, J., & Suarez, J. (2017). Assessing the cyclical implications of IFRS 9 – A recursive model. Occasional Paper Series, 12 (July). European Systemic Risk Board. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2849/2685
   Google Scholar
• D'agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'agostino, R. B. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. The American Statistician, 44(4), 316–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1990.10475751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, J., Maquieira, C., & Jara, M. (2020). Do legal and institutional environments matter for banking system performance? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 2203–2228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1666023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAMC. (2019a). Short presentation (BAMC). http://www.dutb.eu/Lists/Articles/news-itemEN.aspx?ID=298&ContentTypeId=0x0100538800840CA7C64297DD192C5B41C270
   Google Scholar
• BAMC. (2019b). Transfer of non-performing assets. http://www.dutb.eu/en/history.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bank of Slovenia. (2013). Full report on the comprehensive review of the banking system. Bank of Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Bank of Slovenia. (2015). Report of the Bank of Slovenia on the causes of the capital shortfalls of banks. Bank of Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Bank of Slovenia. (2017). Information on non-performing exposures [Press Release]. https://www.bsi.si/en/media/1162/pregled-dogajanja-na-podrocju-nedonosnih-izpostavljenosti
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2017). Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions – interim approach and transitional arrangements. Bank for International Settlements.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, T., Erlinger, D., & Unterrainer, L. (2014). IFRS 9: the new rules for hedge accounting from the risk management perspective. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 3(3), 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2019). After the first year of IFRS 9: Analysis of the initial impact on the large UK banks. https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/financial-services/articles/after-the-first-year-of-ifrs-9.html
   Google Scholar
• Duh, R. R., Hsu, A. W., & Alves, P. A. P. (2012). The impact of IAS 39 on the risk-relevance of earnings volatility: Evidence from foreign banks cross-listed in the USA. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 8(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2012.03.002
   Google Scholar
• EBA. (2016). Report on results from the EBA impact assessment of IFRS 9. EBA.
   Google Scholar
• EBA. (2018). First Observations on the Impact and Implementation of IFRS 9 by EU Institutions. https://eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/2087449/Report+on+IFRS+9+impact+and+implementation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Banking Federation. (2017). EBF position on IFRS 9 transition period (Proposed Article 473a of CRR2). https://www.ebf.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/EBF_026190-EBF-Position-on-IFRS-9-Transition-Period-Proposed-Article-….pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank. (2004). The impact of fair value accounting on the European banking sector – a financial stability perspective. European Central Bank.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Proposal for a Regulation of the European parliament and of the council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2016%3A0850%3AFIN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Economic performances and forecasts. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-performance-and-forecasts_en
   Google Scholar
• Parliament, E. (2016). Resolution of 6 October 2016 on International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 9 (2016/2898(RSP)). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0381_EN.html?redirect
   Google Scholar
• European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). (2017). Financial stability implications of IFRS 9. https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/20170717_fin_stab_imp_IFRS_9.en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EY. (2018). IFRS 9 Expected Credit Loss: Making sense of the transition impact. Ernst & Young.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Forum. (2009). Report of the Financial Stability Forum on addressing procyclicality in the financial system. Financial Stability Forum.
   Google Scholar
• G20. (2009). Declaration on strengthening the financial system. G20.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston, E., & Song, I. W. (2014). Supervisory roles in loan loss provisioning in countries implementing IFRS. IMF Working Papers, 14(170), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484381120.001
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, G., & Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2011). Mandatory IFRS adoption and accounting quality of European banks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(3-4), 289–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Mora, A. (2019). Bank loan loss accounting and its contracting effects: the new expected loss models. Accounting and Business Research, 49(6), 726–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1609898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomaa, M., Kanagaretnam, K., Mestelman, S., & Shehata, M. (2019). Testing the efficacy of replacing the incurred credit loss model with the expected credit loss model. European Accounting Review, 28(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1449660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamadi, M., Heinen, A., Linder, S., & Porumb, V. A. (2016). Does Basel II affect the market valuation of discretionary loan loss provisions?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70, 177–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesterberg, T., Moore, D. S., Monaghan, S., Clipson, A., & Epstein, R. (2005). Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. In D. S. Moore & G. McCabe (Eds.), Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H. (2014). Closing the accounting chapter of the financial crisis [Speech]. https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/news/speeches/2014/hans-hoogervorst-march-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H. (2018). Are we ready for the next crisis? [Speech]. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/2018/12/speech-are-we-ready-for-the-next-crisis/
   Google Scholar
• IFRS. (2014). IASB completes reform of financial instruments accounting. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/2014/07/iasb-completes-reform-of-financial-instruments-accounting/
   Google Scholar
• Khan, E., & Damyanova, V. (2018). European banks’ capital survives new IFRS 9 accounting impact, but concerns remain. S&P Global Market Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Kjosevski, J., Petkovski, M., & Naumovska, E. (2019). Bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants of non-performing loans in the Republic of Macedonia: Comparative analysis of enterprise and household NPLs. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1185–1203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1627894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2018). IFRS 9: Transition impact on banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ae/pdf/IFRS9-transitionimpact-on-banks-in-the-GCC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, S., Rösch, D., & Scheule, H. (2018). The impact of loan loss provisioning on bank capital requirements. Journal of Financial Stability, 36(C), 114–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2010). Did fair-value accounting contribute to the financial crisis? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.1.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loew, E., Schmidt, L. E., Thiel, L. F. ( (2019). ). Accounting for financial instruments under IFRS 9 –First-time application effects on European banks’ balance sheets. EBI Working Paper Series, no. 48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3462299
   Google Scholar
• Ludbrook, J., & Dudley, H. (1998). Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. The American Statistician, 52(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1998.10480551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoa, A., Scarlata, J., Solé, J. (2009). Procyclicality and fair value accounting. Working Paper. WP 09/39. Washington: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451871876.001
   Google Scholar
• Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2016). The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Accounting in Europe, 13(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panetta, F., Angelini, P., Albertazzi, U., Columba, F., Cornacchia, W., Di Cesare, A., … Santini, G. (2009). Financial sector pro-cyclicality: Lessons from the crisis. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper, 44. Bank of Italy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1479499
   Google Scholar
• Seitz, B., Dinh, T., & Rathgeber, A. (2018). Understanding loan loss reserves under IFRS 9: A simulation-based approach. Advances in Quantitative Analysis of Finance and Accounting, 16, 311–357. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6293/AQAFA.201812_16.0010
   Google Scholar
• Sultanoğlu, B. (2018). Expected credit loss model by IFRS 9 and its possible early impacts on European and Turkish banking sector. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(3), 476–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.422581
   Google Scholar
• Xie, B. (2016). Does fair value accounting exacerbate the procyclicality of bank lending? Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 235–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar