What do project managers need to know to succeed in face-to-face communication?

References

• Aaltonen, K. (2011). Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aladpoosh, H., Shaharoun, A. M., & Saman, M. Z. b. M. (2012). Critical features for project stakeholder management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, 4(3), 150–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASS.2012.051130
   Google Scholar
• Anantatmula, V. S. (2015). Strategies for enhancing project performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6), 04015013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., Gannon, J., & Kalchik, J. (2010). 11 Proxemic and haptic interaction: The closeness continuum. In Nonverbal communication (6th ed.). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238150.295
   Google Scholar
• Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., Zwikael, O., Saberi, M., & Sharpe, K. (2020). Hidden fuzzy information: Requirement specification and measurement of project provider performance using the best worst method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 383, 127–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2019.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu, A., Göçken, T., & Kaplanoğlu, V. (2011). A practical approach to prioritize project activities through fuzzy ranking. Cybernetics and Systems, 42(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2011.567892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z. D. U., & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899–907. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggreen, L., & Kampf, C. E. (2015). Project management communication 2.0 — The socio-technical design of PM for professional communicators [Paper presentation]. 2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235842
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccio, S., O’Reilly, J., O’Sullivan, S. L., & Chiocchio, F. (2016). Nonverbal behavior and communication in the workplace. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1044–1074. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315621146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, H.-M., Lin, C.-K., Chen, D.-R., & Chen, Y.-S. (2013). Evolving MCDM applications using hybrid expert-based ISM and DEMATEL models: An example of sustainable ecotourism. TheScientificWorldJournal, 2013, 751728–751718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/751728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserhati, G., & Szabo, L. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organisational event projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 613–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, G. F., & Rabechini, R. Jr. (2019). Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, K., Xia, J., Zhang, X., & Shen, J. (2017). System structural analysis of communication networks based on DEMATEL-ISM and entropy. Journal of Central South University, 24(7), 1594–1601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3564-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbott, M., & Hogg, G. (2001). The role of non-verbal communication in service encounters: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(1–2), 5–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257012571401
   Google Scholar
• Gani, A. N., & Assarudeen, S. N. M. (2012). A new operation on triangular fuzzy number for solving fuzzy linear programming problem. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 6(11), 523–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3405.8881
   Google Scholar
• Goman, C. K. (2011). The silent language of leaders: How body language can help–or hurt–how you lead. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. S. (2008). The impact of project managers’ communication competencies: Validation and extension of a research model for virtuality, satisfaction, and productivity on project teams. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendon, M., Powell, L., & Wimmer, H. (2017). Emotional intelligence and communication levels in information technology professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 165–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F. J., Kacprzyk, J., & Pedrycz, W. (2014). A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Information Fusion, 17, 4–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvari, I. (2007). Project management effectiveness in different organizational conditions. Helsinki School of Economics. http://epub.lib.aalto.fi/pdf/diss/a290.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jaberi Rad, M., & Farajpahlou, H. (2012). Color position in non-verbal communication. Studies in Library and Information Science, 19(3), 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Jeng, D. J.-F. (2015). Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 283–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng, D. J. F. (2011). Structural analysis on team internal soft factors to project success [Paper presentation]. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2011.6007335
   Google Scholar
• Ju, P.-H., Wei, H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). Model of post-implementation user participation within ERP advice network. Asia Pacific Management Review, 21(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C. (Ed.). (2008). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: Theory and applications with recent developments. Vol. 16. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Bardauskiene, D., Cerkauskas, J., Ubarte, I., Seniut, M., Dzemyda, G., Kaklauskaitė, M., Vinogradova, I., & Velykorusova, A. (2019a). An affect-based built environment video analytics. Automation in Construction, 106, 102888.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A., Jokubauskas, D., Cerkauskas, J., Dzemyda, G., Ubarte, I., Skirmantas, D., Podviezko, A., & Simkute, I. (2019b). Affective analytics of demonstration sites. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 81, 346–372.
   Google Scholar
• Katyal, S., & Awasthi, E. (2005). Gender differences in emotional intelligence among adolescents of Chandigarh. Journal of Human Ecology, 17(2), 153–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2005.11905771
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, D. J. (1999). Never be lied to again: How to get the truth in 5 minutes or less in any conversation or situation. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-J., & Wu, W.-W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linneman, T. J. (2013). Gender in Jeopardy!. Gender & Society, 27(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212464905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W.-H., & Cross, J. A. (2016). A comprehensive model of project team technical performance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1150–1166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Huang, M. J., Pedrycz, W., & Zhao, H. (2020). Group decision making based on flexibility degree of fuzzy numbers under a confidence level. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Lohikoski, P., Kujala, J., Härkönen, J., Haapasalo, H., & Muhos, M. (2005). Enhancing communication practices in virtual new product development projects. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 6(4), 16–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIDE.2015100102
   Google Scholar
• Louw, M., & Plooy-Cilliers, F. (2014). Let’s talk about interpersonal communication. 4th ed. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mascia, S. d. (2016). Project psychology. In Gender & Society, 27, 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602448
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2000). Emotional intelligence as zeitgeist, as personality, and as a mental ability. In The handbook of emotional intelligence theory development assessment and application at home school and in the workplace. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Maylor, H., Brady, T., Cooke-Davies, T., & Hodgson, D. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.014
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1971). How HR professionals can interview Like an investigator to avoid bad hires. In Silent messages. Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Messinger, J. (2013). Slapti kūno pranešimai (Secret body reports). Alma litera.
   Google Scholar
• Montequin, V. R., Cousillas, S., Ortega, F., & Villanueva, J. (2014). Analysis of the success factors and failure causes in information & communication technology (ICT) projects in Spain. Procedia Technology, 16, 992–999. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.053
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavizade, F., & Shakibazad, M. (2019). Identifying and ranking CSFs for KM implementation in urban water and sewage companies using ISM-DEMATEL technique. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 200–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, R., & Jugdev, K. (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott – The elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211269040
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. (2013). Kūno kalba (Body language). Alma litera.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, J. (2015). Effective communication.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. M., & Jenkins, J. M. (1992). Human emotions: Function and dysfunction. Annual Review Psychology, 43, 55–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant, I., & Baroudi, B. (2008). Project management education: The human skills imperative. International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2012). Kūno kalbos vadovas (Body Language Guide). Alma litera.
   Google Scholar
• Peleckis, K., Peleckienė, V., & Peleckis, K. (2015). Nonverbal communication in business negotiations and business meetings. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 62, 62–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.62.62
   Google Scholar
• Pheng, L. S. (2018). Project communication management. Chapter 10. In Project management for the built environment (pp. 978–981). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PMI. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (PMBOK Guide). In A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani, A., Chang, A., Wiewiora, A., Ashkanasy, N. M., Jordan, P. J., & Zolin, R. (2016). Manager emotional intelligence and project success: The mediating role of job satisfaction and trust. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1112–1122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani, A., Khosravi, P., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2018). Examining the interdependencies among emotional intelligence, trust, and performance in infrastructure projects: A multilevel study. International Journal of Project Management, 36(8), 1034–1046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaratne, S., & Ruwanpura, M. (2016). Communication in construction: A management perspective through case studies in Sri Lanka. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2015.1056721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam, N., Liebowitz, S. J., & Lackman, C. L. (2012). Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 803–820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00940.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 510–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Cao, Q., & Zhou, L. (2018). Research on the influencing factors in coal mine production safety based on the combination of DEMATEL and ISM. Safety Science, 103, 51–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, M., & Jackson, P. R. (2007). Rethinking internal communication: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280710744847
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, R. J., Wang, Y., & Jin, X. H. (2014). Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviors, and decision-making strategies in construction projects: importance and correlations in practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 74–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, J. B. H., Abdul-Rahman, H., & Chen, W. (2017). Collaborative model: Managing design changes with reusable project experiences through project learning and effective communication. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1253–1271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, Y. C., & Mustaffa, N. E. (2013). Critical success factors for Malaysian construction projects: An empirical assessment. Construction Management and Economics, 31(9), 959–978. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.828843
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Bausys, R., Kaklauskas, A., Ubarte, I., Kuzminske, A., & Gudiene, N. (2017). Sustainable market valuation of buildings by the single-valued neutrosophic MAMVA method. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Bausys, R., Kaklauskas, A., & Raslanas, S. (2019). Hedonic shopping rent valuation by one-to-one neuromarketing and neutrosophic PROMETHEE method. Applied Soft Computing, 85, 105832.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2008). Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria/Projektų valdytojo parinkimo daugiatikslio vertinimo modelis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 462–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.462-477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Huang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety Science, 49(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwikael, O., & Globerson, S. (2006). From critical success factors to critical success processes. International Journal of Production Research, 44(17), 3433–3449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500536921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar