4,004
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SI: ACIEK 2020 ESIC

Can higher education admission be more equitable? Evidence supporting the inclusion of relative ranking in the process

&
Pages 2539-2554 | Received 23 Jun 2020, Accepted 04 Oct 2020, Published online: 26 Oct 2020

References

  • Aitken, N. D. (1982). College student performance, satisfaction, and retention: Specification and estimation of a structural model. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1982.11780423
  • Alnahdi, G. (2015). Aptitude tests and successful college students: The predictive validity of the General Aptitude Test (GAT) in Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies, 8(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n4p1
  • Barber, M., Chijioke, C., & Mourshed, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey & Company.
  • Bellei, C. (2013). El estudio de la segregación socioeconómica y académica de la educación chilena [The study of the socioeconomic and academic segregation of Chilean education]. Estudios Pedagógicos, 39(1), 325–345.
  • Beyer, H. (2009). Igualdad de oportunidades y selección a las universidades [Equal opportunities and selection for universities]. Puntos de Referencia, 303, 1–10.
  • Brunner, J. J., & Miranda, D. A. (Ed.). (2016). Educación superior en Iberoamérica: Informe 2016. [Higher education in Ibero-America: 2016 Report]. Centro Interuniversitario de Desarrollo.
  • Brunsma, D. L., Brown, E. S., & Placier, P. (2012). Teaching race at historically White colleges and universities: Identifying and dismantling the walls of whiteness. Critical Sociology, 39(5), 717–738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920512446759
  • Campos, J., & Guerrero, P. (2016). Efectos indeseados de la medición de la calidad educativa en Chile: La respuesta de la sociedad civil [Undesired effects of measuring educational quality in Chile: The response of civil society. Cadernos CEDES, 36(100), 355–374. ].
  • Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets and America's schools. Brookings Institute.
  • Chumacero, R., Paredes, R., & Gallegos, J. (2016). Competition pressures and academic performance in a generalized vouchers context. Estudios de Economía, 43(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862016000200003
  • Contreras, D. (2001). Evaluating a voucher system in Chile: Individual, family and school characteristics. (Working paper N°175). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.
  • Contreras, D., Gallegos, S., & Meneses, F. (2009). Determinantes de desempeño universitario: ¿Importa la habilidad relativa? Análisis ex-ante y ex-post de una política pública. [Determinants of university performance: Does relative ability matter? Ex-ante and ex-post analysis of a public policy. Consejo Nacional de Educación.
  • Dias, J., & Brito, M. R. (2008). La educación superior en Brasil: principales tendencias y desafíos [Higher education in Brazil: Main trends and challenges. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, 13(2), 487–507.
  • Dubet, F. (2004). Repensar la justicia social: Contra el mito de la igualdad de oportunidades. [Rethinking social justice: Against the myth of equal opportunities]. Siglo XXI.
  • Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
  • Espinoza, O. (2017). Acceso al sistema de educación superior en Chile. El tránsito desde un régimen de élite a uno altamente masificado y desregulado [Access to the higher education system in Chile. The transition from an elite regime to a highly massed and deregulated one. Universidades, 74, 7–30. ].
  • Fajnzylber, E., Lara, B., & León, T. (2018, April). Increased learning or GPA inflation? Evidence from GPA-based university admission in Chile. (CEPA Working Paper No. 18-07). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis.
  • Flórez, M. T. (2013). Análisis crítico de la validez del sistema de medición de la calidad de la educación (SIMCE): Informe final. [Critical analysis of the validity of the system for measuring the quality of education (SIMCE): Final report]. Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
  • Garbanzo, G. (2007). Factores asociados al rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios, una reflexión desde la calidad de la educación superior pública [Factors associated with academic performance in university students, a reflection from the quality of public higher education. Revista Educación, 31(1), 43–63. ].
  • Geiger, M., & Cooper, E. (1995). Predicting academic performance: The impact of expectancy and needs theory. The Journal of Experimental Education, 63(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943812
  • González, P., Arancibia, V., & Boyanova, D. (2017). Talento académico, vulnerabilidad escolar y resultados en la prueba de selección universitaria [Academic talent, school vulnerability and results in the university selection test. Estudios pedagógicos, 43(1), 171–191.
  • Herman, J. L., & Golan, S. (1993). The effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 20–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00550.x
  • Jia, Q., & Ericson, D. P. (2017). Equity and access to higher education in China: Lessons from Hunan province for university admissions policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 97–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.011
  • Juarros, M. (2006). ¿Educación superior como derecho o como privilegio? Las políticas de admisión a la universidad en el contexto de los países de la región [Higher education as a right or as a privilege? University admission policies in the context of the countries of the region]. Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social, 3(5), 69–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v3i5.342
  • Kenno, S., Lau, M., Sainty, B., & Boles, B. (2020). Budgeting, strategic planning and institutional diversity in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1711045
  • Koljatic, M., & Silva, M. (2013). Opening a side-gate: Engaging the excluded in Chilean higher education through test-blind admission. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1427–1441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.623299
  • Larroucau, T., Ríos, I., & Mizala, A. (2015). Efecto de la incorporación del ranking de notas en el proceso de admisión a las universidades chilenas. Pensamiento Educativo: Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 52(1), 95–118.
  • Mahlangu, V. P. (2020). Rethinking student admission and access in higher education through the lens of capabilities approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(1), 175–185.
  • Mainieri, A. M. (2017). Innovaciones en modelos de admisión: Estudio de casos y estrategias de inclusión en educación superior [Innovations in admission models: Case studies and inclusion strategies in higher education. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 17(3), 1–41. ].
  • Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
  • Marshall, D., & Case, J. (2010). Rethinking ‘disadvantage’ in higher education: A paradigmatic case study using narrative analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 491–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903518386
  • McCowan, T. (2016). Three dimensions of equity of access to higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(4), 645–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1043237
  • Meckes, L., & Bascopé, M. (2009). Distribución inequitativa de los nuevos profesores mejor preparados: Características de origen y destino laboral de los egresados de pedagogía básica. [Inequitable distribution of the new, better prepared teachers: Characteristics of origin and employment destination of graduates of basic pedagogy]. Centro de Estudios de Políticas y Prácticas en Educación.
  • MINEDUC. (2012). Inclusión del ranking de notas en el proceso de admisión 2013: Posibles efectos en la equidad de acceso a la educación superior [Inclusion of the ranking of grades in the 2013 admission process: Possible effects on equity of access to higher education]. Serie Evidencias 1(7), 1–10.
  • MINEDUC. (2013). Inclusión del ranking en el proceso de admisión 2013: Un análisis a la luz de los resultados de la PSU [Inclusion of the ranking in the 2013 admission process: An analysis in light of the results of the PSU]. Serie Evidencias en Educación, 13(1), 1–7.
  • Muñoz, P., & Redondo, A. (2013). Desigualdad y logro académico en Chile [Inequality and academic achievement in Chile]. Revista CEPAL, 109, 107–123.
  • Muñoz-Comonfort, A., Leenen, I., & Fortoul-van der Goes, T. (2014). Correlación entre la evaluación diagnóstica y el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de medicina [Correlation between diagnostic evaluation and academic performance of medical students. Investigación en Educación Médica, 3(10), 85–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(14)72731-0
  • Murnane, R., Waldman, M., Willett, J., Bos, M., & Vegas, E. (2017). The consequences of educational voucher reform in Chile. (NBER Working Paper Series No. 23550). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Newton, P., & Baird, J. (2016). The great validity debate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 173–177.
  • Niessen, A. S. M., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. (2018). Admission testing for higher education: A multi-cohort study on the validity of high-fidelity curriculum-sampling tests. PLoS One, 13(6), e0198746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198746
  • Ortúzar, M., Flores, S., Milesi, C., & Cox, C. (2009). Aspectos de la formación inicial docente y su influencia en el rendimiento académico de los alumnos [Aspects of initial teacher training and its influence on students’ academic performance]. In I. Irarrázaval, E. Puga, & M. Letelier (Eds.), Camino al Bicentenario. Propuestas para Chile. [On the way to the Bicentennial. Proposals for Chile] (pp. 155–186). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
  • Padilla, J., Gómez, J., Hidalgo, M., & Muñiz, J. (2006). La evaluación de las consecuencias del uso de los test en la teoría de la validez [The evaluation of the consequences of the use of tests in the theory of validity]. Psicothema, 18(2), 307–312.
  • Paredes, R., & Paredes, V. (2009). Chile: Rendimiento académico y gestión de la educación en un contexto de rigidez laboral [Chile: Academic performance and management of education in a context of labor rigidity]. Revista de la CEPAL, 99, 119–131.
  • Pearson. (2013, January 22). Evaluation of the Chile PSU: Final Report. http://www.educacion2020.cl/sites/default/files/201301311057540.chile_psu-finalreport.pdf
  • Pesántez, F., Martín, E., & Bojorque, R. (2015). Una mirada crítica al sistema de acceso a la Educación Superior ecuatoriana [A critical look at the access system to Ecuadorian higher education]. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 34(2), 63–76.
  • Ramírez, M. J. (2011). El SIMCE en el contexto de la ley de aseguramiento de la calidad de la educación: Opciones para mejorar nuestro sistema de evaluación [SIMCE in the context of the education quality assurance law: Options to improve our evaluation system]. Estudios Públicos, 123, 1–23.
  • Rawls, J. (1979). Teoría de la justicia. [A theory of justice]. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Rodríguez, C., & Padilla, G. (2016). Trayectoria escolar y selección universitaria: comportamiento del ranking como factor de inclusión a la educación superior [School trajectory and university selection: Behaviour of the ranking as a factor of inclusion in higher education]. Sophia, 12(2), 195–206.
  • Rodríguez, C., & Jarpa, C. G. (2015). Capacidad predictiva de las notas en enseñanza media sobre el rendimiento en pruebas de selección universitaria: el caso chileno [Predictive ability of grades in secondary education on performance in university selection tests: The Chilean case. Aula Abierta, 43(2), 61–68. ].
  • Rossi, F. (2010). Massification, competition and organizational diversity in higher education: Evidence from Italy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903050539
  • Santelices, M. V., Horn, C., & Catalán, X. (2019). Institution-level admissions initiatives in Chile: Enhancing equity in higher education?. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 733–761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1398722
  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Allen Lane/Penguin.
  • Sulphey, M. M., Al-Kahtani, N. S., & Syed, A. M. (2018). Relationship between admission grades and academic achievement. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 648–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(17)
  • Tristán, A., & Pedraza, N. (2017). La objetividad en las pruebas estandarizadas [Objectivity in standardised tests]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 10(1), 11–31.
  • Vergara, D. G., Peredo, G., & López, H. (2020). Relación inconsistente entre puntajes del Sistema de Medición de Calidad de la Educación y el promedio de notas en estudiantes de octavo básico en Chile [Inconsistent relationship netween scores from the education quality measurement system and grade points average in eighth grade students in Chile]. Revista Educación, 44(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.37569
  • Villalobos, C., Treviño, E., Wyman, I., & Scheele, J. (2017). Social justice debate and college access in Latin America: Merit or need? The role of educational institutions and states in broadening access to higher education in the region. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25(73), 1–26.
  • Walker, M. (2020). Student decision-making about accessing university in South Africa. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1785845
  • Zwick, R. (2012). The role of admissions test scores, socioeconomic status, and high school grades in predicting college achievement. Pensamiento Educativo: Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 49(2), 23–30.
  • Zwick, R. (2019). Assessment in American higher education: The role of admission tests. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843469