International economic policy: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis on think tanks in the press

References

• Abelson, D. E. (2009). Do think tanks matter? Assessing the impact of public policy institutes. McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abelson, D. E. (2013). Think-tanks, social democracy and social policy. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(4), 894–902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshed, N. (2017). The origins of policy ideas: The importance of think tanks in the enterprise policy process in the UK. Journal of Business Research, 71, 74–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athari, S. A., Shaeri, K., Kirikkaleli, D., Ertugrul, H. M., & Ozun, A. (2020). Global competitiveness and capital flows: Does stage of economic development and risk rating matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 27(4), 426–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier, G., & Bakvis, H. (2001). Think tanks and political parties: Competitors or collaborators? ISUMA: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (2001). Medaited politics: Communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. J., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review, 103(3), 117–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity. The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelló-Sirvent, F., Roger-Monzó, V., & García-García, J. M. (2020). Deep impact: A longitudinal analysis of the presence of think tanks in the press during the crisis and the recovery period. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 2956–2975. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1694561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Esparcia, A. (2009). Relaciones públicas y “Think Tanks” en América Latina. Estudio sobre su implantación y acción. Razón y Palabra, 14, 70.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Esparcia, A., Guerra-Heredia, S., & Almansa-Martínez, A. (2017). Political communication and think tanks in Spain. Strategies with the Media. El Profesional de la Información, 26(4), 1699–2407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cezar, R. F. (2020). Compliance in “exceptional” trade disputes: A set-theoretical approach. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 63(1), e003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuliá, E. (2018). Una aproximación a los think tanks como organizaciones proveedoras de información y análisis a la sociedad. Revista Española de Sociología, 27(2), 333–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2018.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, R. (2019). Why and how do think tanks expand their networks in times of crisis? The case of Bruegel and the Centre for European Policy Studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 286–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1415953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2012). Mediation, financialization and the global financial crises: An inverted politi- cal economy perspective. In D. Winseck & D. Y. Yin (Eds.), The political economies of media: The transformation of the global media industries (pp. 241–254). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., Hak, T., Goertz, G., & Voss, C. (2010). Necessary condition hypotheses in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(11), 1170–1190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011087378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Factiva. (2019). Dow Jones & Company. https://www.dowjones.com/products/factiva/
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez González-Jover, A. (2002). La equivalencia como cuestión central de la traducción en las instituciones de la Unión Europea. En: Actas del I Congreso Internacional sobre el español, lengua de traducción. Almagro.
   Google Scholar
• González-Bustamante, B. (2013). Factores de acceso y permanencia de la élite política gubernamental en Chile (1990–2010). Política. Revista de Ciencia Política, 51(1), 119–153.
   Google Scholar
• González-Enríquez, C. (2018). Universidades y think tanks, una comparación prosaica. Revista Española de Sociología, 27(2), 325–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (1993). Mass media and American politics. Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kelstrup, J. D. (2016). The politics of think tanks in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelstrup, J. D. (2017). Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R., (2009). Case centered methods and quantitative analysis. In D. Byrne, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of case-based methods (pp. 184–207). Sage Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2013). How the case for austerity has crumbled. The New York Review of Books. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/06/06/how-case-austerity-has-crumbled/
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, R., & Fiss, P. C. (2009). Comparative organizational analysis across multiple levels: A set-theoretic approach. In B. King, T. Felin, & D. Whetten (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Studying differences between organizations: Comparative approaches to organizational research) (pp. 91–116). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lalueza, F., & Girona, R. (2016). The impact of think tanks on mass media discourse regarding the economic crisis in Spain. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Ma, L. (2019). What drives the governance of ridesharing? A fuzzy-set QCA of local regulations in China. Policy Sciences, 52(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09359-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M. (2014). The eurozone crisis: Growing pains or doomed from the start? In Handbook of global economic governance (pp. 201–217). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J. G. (2019). 2018 global go to think tank index report. University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J. G., & Weaver, R. K. (Eds.). (2000). Think tanks & civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McLevey, J. (2014). Think tanks, funding, and the politics of policy knowledge in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 51(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medvetz, T. (2008). Think tanks as an emergent field. The Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Medvetz, T. (2012). Murky power: “Think tanks” as boundary organizations. In D. Courpasson, D. Golsorkhi, & J. Sallaz (Eds.), Rethinking power in organizations, institutions, and markets (pp. 113–133). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (2012). Public intellectuals and think tanks: A free market in ideas? International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 25(4), 127–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3
   Google Scholar
• Montobbio, M. (2013). La geopolítica del pensamiento: Think tanks y política exterior. Real Instituto Elcano.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto‐Alemán, P. A., García‐Alvarez‐Coque, J. M., Roig‐Tierno, N., & Mas‐Verdú, F. (2019). Factors of regional poverty reduction in Colombia: Do institutional conditions matter? Social Policy & Administration, 53(7), 1045–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares, A., González-Bustamante, B., Meneses, J., & Rodríguez, M. (2014). Los think tanks en el gabinete: Una exploración del caso chileno (2006–2014). Revista de Sociología, 2014(29), 36177.
   Google Scholar
• Otero-Iglesias, M., & Steinberg, F. (2019). Lecciones de la crisis financiera global para fortalecer la Unión Económica y Monetaria. ICE, Revista de Economía, 2019(906), 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Parrilla, R., Almiron, N., & Xifra, J. (2016). Crisis and interest: The political economy of think tanks during the great recession. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Yruela, P. (2018). La producción de conocimiento social: Universidades y think tanks. Revista Española de Sociología, 27(2), 313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plehwe, D., Neujeffski, M., & Krämer, W. (2018). Saving the dangerous idea: Austerity think tank networks in the European Union. Policy and Society, 37(2), 188–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radulescu, M., Serbanescu, L., & Sinisi, C. I. (2019). Consumption vs. Investments for stimulating economic growth and employment in the CEE Countries: A panel analysis. Economic research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2329–2353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2009a). Reflections on casing and case-oriented research. In D. Byrne & C. Ragin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of case-based methods (pp. 522–534). Sage Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2009b). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (vol. 51, pp. 87–121). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., Kriss, A., Drass., & Davey, S. (2006). Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., & Pennings, P. (2005). Fuzzy sets and social research. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), 423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, K., & Viterna, J. S. (1999). Political demands, political opportunities: Explaining the differential success of left-libertarian parties. Social Forces, 78(2), 491–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3005565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573–578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requejo-Coll, F., Jordana-Casajuana, J., Ramió-Matas, C., & Gil, E. (2000). Els Think Tanks a Catalunya. Idees: Revista de Temes Contemporanis, 2000(7), 42–61.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A., & Weaver, R. K. (2000). Think tanks in the U.S. media. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(4), 81–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X00005004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. (2013). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), anno 2013: Reframing the comparative method's seminal statements. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Lobe, B. (2009). The case for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison. In D. Byrne & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of case-based methods (pp. 222–242). Sage Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. (2017). Diseños de investigación en QCA. In I. Medina, P. J. Castillo-Ortiz, P. Alamos-Concha, & B. Rihoux (Eds.), Análisis Cualitativo Comparado (QCA). Cuadernos metodológicos (Vol. 56, pp. 53–66). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS).
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis and related techniques. Sage Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Roig-Tierno, N., González-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martínez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusu, V. D., & Roman, A. (2018). An empirical analysis of factors affecting competitiveness of CEE countries. Economic research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 2044–2059. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1480969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. (2008). Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill, Irvin.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. (2010). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 246–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schui, F. (2014). Austerity. The great failure. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2010). The global competitiveness report 2010–2011. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrington, P. (2000). British think tanks: advancing the intellectual debate? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 2(2), 256–263.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2007). Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes. Public Administration, 85(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Denham, A. (2004). Think tank traditions. Policy research and the politics of ideas. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2005). Think tanks and policy advice in countries in transition. Paper prepared for the Asian Development Bank Institute Symposium: How to Strengthen Policy-Oriented Research and Training in Vietnam, ADB Institute Discussion Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, E. (2015). Is output performance all about the resources? A fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis of street‐level bureaucrats in Switzerland. Public Administration, 93(1), 177–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuilen, J. (2005). Assigning membership in a fuzzy set analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), 462–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiarda, H. (2008). The new powerhouses: Think tanks and foreign policy. American Foreign Policy Interests, 30(2), 96–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10803920802022704
   Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar