Licensing under Cournot vs Bertrand competition

References

• Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. (2003). The structure of licensing contracts. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 103–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00114
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., & Poddar, S. (2019). To sell or not to sell’: Licensing versus selling by an outside innovator. Economic Modelling, 76, 293–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, O., Ferreira, F., et al. (2014). Patent licensing: Stackelberg versus Cournot models. In J. A. Tenreiro Machado (Eds.), Discontinuity and complexity in nonlinear physical systems (pp. 409–420). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J., & Kabiraj, T. (2018). Technology transfer in a Stackelberg structure: Licensing contracts and welfare - corrigendum. The Manchester School, 86(5), 695–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R.-Y., Hwang, H., & Peng, C. H. (2013). Technology licensing, R&D and welfare. Economics Letters, 118, 396–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M. C., Lin, C. H., & Hu, J. L. (2013). The optimal licensing strategy of an outside patentee in vertically-related markets. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3), 102–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n3p102
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. P. (2001). Technology transfer with moral hazard. Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(1–2), 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, S., & Filippini, L. (2015). Patent licensing with Bertrand competitors. The Manchester School, 83(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkal, N. (2005). Optimal licensing policy in differentiated industries. The Economic Review, 81(252), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C., Jun, B. H., & Wolfstetter, E. G. (2018). Per unit vs. ad valorem royalty licensing. Economics Letters, 170, 71–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. A. (2011). Licensing in an international competition with differentiated goods. In J. A. Tenreiro Machado, D. Baleanu, & A. Luo (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics of complex systems: Application in physical, biological and financial systems (pp. 295–305). Springer Science + Business Media Llc.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Bode, O. R. (2013). Licensing endogenous cost-reduction in a differentiated Stackelberg model. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18(2), 308–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Tuns (Bode), O. R. (2012). Per-unit royalty and fixed-fee licensing in a differentiated Stackelberg model. IEEE 4th International Conference on Nonlinear Science and Complexity Proceedings (pp. 99–102).
   Google Scholar
• Filippini, L. (2005). Licensing contract in a Stackelberg model. The Manchester School, 73(5), 582–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosfuri, A., & Roca, E. (2004). Optimal licensing strategy: Royalty or fixed-fee? International Journal of Business and Economics, 3, 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J., Liu, L., Wang, X. H., & Zeng, C. (2019). Ad valorem versus per-unit royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. The Manchester School, 87(6), 890–901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, T. (2005). Technology transfer in a Stackelberg structure: Licensing contracts and welfare. The Manchester School, 73(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiraj, A., & Kabiraj, T. (2017). Tariff induced licensing contracts, consumers’ surplus and Welfare. Economic Modelling, 60, 439–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I. (1992). Patent licensing. In R. Aumann & S. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of game theory with economic applications (pp. 331–354). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., Oren, S. S., & Tauman, Y. (1992). Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 21(5), 483–508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(92)90036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., & Tauman, Y. (2002). Patent licensing: The inside story. The Manchester School, 70(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). How to license intangible property. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1885697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, T., Masuda, Y., & Umezawa, M. (2018). Impact of Technology development costs on licensing form in a differentiated Cournot duopoly. International Journal of Economic Theory, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Ji, X. (2010). Innovation, licensing, and price vs. quantity competition. Economic Modelling, 27(3), 746–754. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, P., & Saggi, K. (2002). Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition. European Economic Review, 46, 201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjit, S. (1990). On a non-cooperative theory of technology transfer. Economics Letters, 33(3), 293–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar, S., & Sinha, U. B. (2004). On patent licensing in spatial competition. Economic Record, 80(249), 208–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar, S., & Sinha, U. B. (2010). Patent licensing from high-cost firm to a low-cost firm. Economic Record, 86(274), 384–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2010.00633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L. D. (1997). On the dynamic efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory, 75(1), 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockett, K. (1990). The quality of licensed technology. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8(4), 559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H. (1998). Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. Economics Letters, 60(1), 55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H. (2002). Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly. Journal of Economics and Business, 54, 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. F. S., Mukherjee, A., & Zeng, C. (2020). Does technology licensing matter for privatization? Journal of Public Economic Theory, 22(5), 1462–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. H., & Yang, B. Z. (1999). On licensing under Bertrand competition. Australian Economic Papers, 38(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00045
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Q., & Yang, L. (2018). Optimal licensing in a differentiated Bertrand market under uncertain R&D outcomes and technology spillover. Economic Modelling, 68, 117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-C., & Nie, P.-Y. (2015). R&D subsidies under asymmetric Cournot competition. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28, 830–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., & Chen, T.-L. (2020). Quality differentiation and product innovation licensing. Economic Modelling, 87, 372–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar