Co-patents’ commercialization: evidence from China

References

• Agostini, L., & Caviggioli, F. (2015). R & D collaboration in the automotive innovation environment: An analysis of co-patenting activities. Management Decision, 53(6), 1224–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A. (2003). Licensing the market for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization and Environment, 52(2), 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., & Poddar, S. (2019). To sell or not to sell’: Licensing versus selling by an outside innovator. Economic Modelling, 76, 293–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Looy, B. V. (2014). Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 841–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Looy, B. V. (2010). Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 869–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00757.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA, 277(15), 1224–1228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540390054035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, K. (2015). Co-owner relationships conducive to high quality joint patents. Research Policy, 44(8), 1566–1573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, K., & Wade, M. (2014). More is better: Evidence that joint patenting leads to quality innovation. Applied Economics, 46(35), 4370–4379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.957446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. B. (2011). Using patent analysis to establish technological position: Two different strategic approaches. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-F., & Lee, A.-H. (2011). The influences of relationship marketing strategy and transaction cost on customer satisfaction, perceived risk, and customer loyalty. African Journal of Business Management, 5(13), 5199–5209.
   Google Scholar
• Chiles, T. H., & McMackin, J. F. (1996). Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintagunta, P. K., Qin, M. S., & Vitorino, M. A. (2018). Licensing and price competition in tied-goods markets: An application to the single-serve coffee system industry. Marketing Science, 37(6), 883–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interim collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535–556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<535::AID-SMJ885>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, M. (2013). Patent sharing by US universities: An examination of university joint patenting. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 22(4), 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., & Luzzi, A. (2007). The market for patents in Europe. Research Policy, 36(8), 1163–1183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Chen, Y., Song, W., Peng, X., & Song, X. (2015). Regional university-industry knowledge flow: A study of Chinese academic patent licensing data. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 03(02), 59–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.32009
   Google Scholar
• Gregorio, D. D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. (2003). Sharing intellectual property rights—An exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(5), 1035–1050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.5.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., Kranenburg, H. V., & Osborn, R. N. (2003). Joint patenting amongst companies: Exploring the effects of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience. Managerial & Decision Economics, 24(2/3), 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, T., Tanaka, Y., & Adrian, A. (2012). Managing joint R&D: An investigation into joint patent applications in Japan, USA and Europe. International Journal of Technology Transfer & Commercialisation, 11(3/4), 137–155.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T. R. (2016). Boundaries, extraterritoriality, and patent infringement damages. Notre Dame L. Rev, 92(4), 1745–1794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Feng, B., Wu, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China’s high-tech industries? Technovation, 57, 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2013). Licensing versus selling in transactions for exploiting patented technological knowledge assets in the markets for technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9252-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H., & Mallig, N. (2009, November). Regional patterns of co-patenting by technological fields, a Europe - US comparison. Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lemley, M. A. (2005). Inducing patent infringement. UC Davis Law Review, 39, 225.
   Google Scholar
• Lemley, M. A., & Feldman, R. (2016). Patent licensing, technology transfer, and innovation. American Economic Review, 106(5), 188–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. Veterinary Record, 25(2), 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Tao, Y., Yang, Z., & Bi, K. (2019). Exploring and visualizing the patent collaboration network: A case study of smart grid field in China. Sustainability, 11(2), 465–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungberg, D., Bourelos, E., & McKelvey, M. (2013). Academic inventors, technological profiles and patent value: An analysis of academic patents owned by Swedish-based firms. Industry & Innovation, 20(5), 473–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.824193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, B. J., Richardson, K., Oliver, E., & Costa, M. (2018). An empirical look at the brokered market for patents. Market for Patents, 83(2), 359–410.
   Google Scholar
• Lv, D. D., Zeng, P., & Lan, H. (2018). Co-patent, financing constraints, and innovation in SMEs: an empirical analysis using market value panel data of listed firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motohashi, K. (2008). Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms. Research Policy, 37(9), 1548–1555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomeras, N. (2007). An analysis of pure-revenue technology licensing. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(4), 971–994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paniccia, P., & Baiocco, S. (2018). Co-evolution of the university technology transfer: Towards a sustainability-oriented industry. Sustainability, 10(12), 4675–4704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradiso, R. J., & Pietrowski, E. (2009). Dilemmas of joint patent ownership. New Jersey Law Journal, 197, 912–913.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. M. A., Kovaleski, J. L., Yoshino, R. T., & Pagani, R. N. (2019). Knowledge and technology transfer influencing the process of innovation in green supply chain management: A multicriteria model based on the DEMATEL method. Sustainability, 11(12), 3485–3518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., & Strauss, R. P. (1975). The prediction of occupation using multiple logit models. International Economic Review, 16(2), 471–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2525826
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, C. J. (2010). The dynamics of the transfer and renewal of patents. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(4), 686–708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M. K., & Wang, T. (2015). When does selling make you wiser? Impact of licensing on Chinese firms’ patenting propensity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 602–628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9354-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, S. (2004). Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Science, 50(6), 835–853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternitzke, C. (2009). The international preliminary examination of patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty—A proxy for patent value? Scientometrics, 78(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1837-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M. J., & Cao, X. M. (2011). Patent co-ownership——Economic analysis of transaction and license. Journal of University of Science & Technology Beijing, 22(4), 116–119.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, R. (2007). Commercialization of patents and external financing during the R&D phase. Research Policy, 36(7), 1052–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X. L., Kou, G., & Zhang, W. K. (2020). Geographic distance, venture capital and technological performance: Evidence from Chinese enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. (1994). Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90050-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torremans, P. (2016). Jurisdiction for cross-border intellectual property infringement cases in Europe. Common Market Law Review, 53(6), 1625–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvaronavičienė, M., & Černevičiūtė, J. (2015). Technology transfer phenomenon and its impact on sustainable development. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 5(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.5.1(7)
   Google Scholar
• Wade, M. (2014). More is better: evidence that joint patenting leads to quality innovation. Applied Economics, 46(35), 4370–4379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelbach, A., & Walter, A. (2015). Complex technological knowledge and value creation in science-to-industry technology transfer projects: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 98–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Welch, E. W., & Huang, W.-L. (2015). Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents. Technovation, 36-37, 12–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar