Determinants of tax avoidance – evidence on profit tax-paying companies in Romania

References

• Allen, A., Francis, B. B., Wu, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Analyst coverage and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 73, 84–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J., Bahl, R., & Murray, M. N. (1993). Audit selection and income tax under-reporting in the tax compliance game. Journal of Development Economics, 42(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(93)90070-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonetti, P., & Anesa, M. (2017). Consumer reactions to corporate tax strategies. The role of political ideology. Journal of Business Research, 74, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C., Blouin, J., & Larcker, D. (2012). The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 391–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C., Blouin, J., Jagolinzer, A., & Larcker, D. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badertscher, B. A., Katz, S. P., & Rego, S. O. (2013). The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2/3), 228–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, T., von Hagen, D., & Steffens, C. (2019). Taxes and firm size: Political cost or political power? Journal of Accounting Literature, 42(C), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanch, J. M. (2016). Observaciones en torno a la formacion historica de la regla ’in dubio contra fiscum (pro fisco)’ y a la recta interpretación de mod. l. sing. de praescript. d. 49.14.10. General de Derecho Roma, 26(7), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Blaufus, K., Möhlmann, A., & Schwäbe, A. (2019). Stock price reactions to news about corporate tax avoidance and evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 278–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijink, W., Janssen, B., & Schols, Y. (1999). Corporate effective tax rates in the European Union – Final report. Commissioned by the Ministry of Finance in the Netherlands. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Bușu, M. (2014). How concentrated is the Romanian mobile market? SEA – Practical Application of Science, 2(4), 473–482.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. P., & Chu, C. (2005). Internal control vs. external manipulation: A model of corporate income tax evasion. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(4), 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chennells, L., & Griffith, R. (1997). Taxing profits in a changing world. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chyz, J. (2013). Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 311–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyz, J., Leung, W. S. C., Li, O. Z., & Rui, O. M. (2013). Labor unions and tax aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 675–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J., & Shackelford, D. (1995). Corporate domicile and average effective tax rates: The cases of Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873107
   Google Scholar
• Comândaru, A. M., Stănescu, S. G., & Păduraru A. (2018). The phenomenon of tax evasion and the need to combat tax evasion. Contemporary Economy Journal, 3(3), 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Constantin, S. B. (2014). A study on tax evasion in Romania. ECOTREND Conference Proceedings, Academica Brâncuşi House Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Constantin, S. B. (2016). Tax havens in the offshore world. ‘Ovidius University Annals. Economic Sciences Series, 16(1), 487–492.
   Google Scholar
• Constantin, S. B. (2018). Ghost companies, fiction or reality? Ovidius’ University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 18(2), 583–587.
   Google Scholar
• David, D., & Pojar, D. (2011). Approaches regarding the tax evasion in Romania. Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, 1(1), 376–381.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M. A., Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2007). Theft and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 591–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009a). Earnings management, corporate tax shelters, and book-tax alignment. National Tax Journal, 62(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.1.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009b). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.3.537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. (2010). Google 2.4% rate shows how $60 billion is lost to tax loopholes. Retrieved 05 January, 2019 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-21/google-2-4-rate-shows-how-60-billion-u-s-revenue-lost-to-tax-loopholes.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichfelder, S., & Hechtner, F. (2018). Tax compliance costs: Cost burden and cost reliability. Public Finance Review, 46(5), 764–792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117691603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallan, E., & Fallan, L. (2019). Corporate tax behaviour and environmental disclosure: Strategic trade-offs across elements of CSR? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101042–101015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Rodríguez, E., & Martínez-Arias, A. (2012). Do business characteristics determine an effective tax rate? The Chinese Economy, 45(6), 60–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475450604
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Rodríguez, E., & Martínez-Arias, A. (2014). Determinants of the effective tax rate in the BRIC countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(sup3), 214–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X5003S313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallemore, J., & Labro, E. (2015). The importance of the internal information environment for tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhart, M. S. (2017). Measuring corporate tax avoidance – An analysis of different measures. Junior Management Science, 3, 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. (2010). Categories of financial crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 17(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791011082797.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates. evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(96)00055-5
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, T., & Overesch, M. (2014). How does aggressive tax planning of multinational firms affect accounting-based ETRs? Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Halioui, K., Neifar, S., & Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2016). Corporate governance, CEO compensation and tax aggressiveness – Evidence from American firms listed on the NASDAQ 100. Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-01-2015-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 126–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, D., Omer, T., & Phillips, J. (2015). The influence of a firm's business strategy on its tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 674–702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., & Feeny, S. (2003). Habit persistence in effective tax rates. Applied Economics, 35, 951–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafar, A., & Thornton, J. (2015). Tax havens and effective tax rates: An analysis of private versus public European firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 435–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, R., Weaver, C., & Mayew, W. (2012). The extent of implicit taxes at the corporate level and the effect of TRA86. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 1021–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindřichovská, I., Kubíčková, D., & Mocanu, M. (2020). Case Study analysis of sustainability reporting of an agri-food giant. Sustainability, 12(11), 4491–4451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubick, T., & Lockhart, B. (2017). Corporate tax aggressiveness and the maturity structure of debt. Advances in Accounting, 36, 50–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguir, I., Stagliano, R., & Elbaz, J. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness? Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 662–675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness, An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazăr, S. (2011). Effective corporate income tax rate in Romania, A micro-backward looking approach. Annals of the Faculty of Eonomics, 1(2), 361–366.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Tong, N., & Tucker, A. (2014). Corporate tax aggression and debt. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 227–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipatov, V. (2012). Corporate tax evasion. The case for specialists. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 185–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafrolla, E., & D’Amico, E. (2016). Tax aggressiveness in family firms and the non-linear entrenchment effect. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manea, A. C. (2011). Means and methods of preventing and combating tax evasion adopted by Romania and Moldova. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series VII, pp. Social Sciences, Law, 4(53), 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Manea, C. A. (2015). Tax evasion in Romania – a national security issue. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences, 8(57), 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, A. L. (2017). Tax aggressiveness: a literature survey. Journal of Education and Research in Accounting, 11(special edition,6), 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, R., Lanis, R., Wells, P., & Govendir, B. (2018). The impact of dividend imputation on corporate tax avoidance: The case of shareholder value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 492–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, L., & Newberry, K. (2001). The influence of tax and non-tax costs on book-tax reporting differences: Public and private firms. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jata.2001.23.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Mills, L., & Newberry, K. (2005). Firms' off-balance sheet and hybrid debt financing: Evidence from their book-tax reporting differences. Journal of Accounting Research, 43 (2), 251–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeed, M. A., & Yan, C. (2019). Financial statement comparability and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1813–1843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1640627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onofrei, M., Vintilă, G., Gherghina, ŞC., & Păunescu, R. A. (2016). Empirical study towards the drivers of effective corporate tax rate. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15 (39C), 413–430.
   Google Scholar
• Onofrei, M., Vintila, G., Gherghina, S. C., Păunescu, R. A., & Oprea, F. (2018). Do firm characteristics influence effective corporate tax rate? Empirical evidence from a panel of former communist Eastern European markets. Transformations in Business & Economics, 17(44B), 42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Pana, I. (2019). Control and prevention of fiscal crime. Bulletin of “Carol I” National Defense University, 1, 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Păunescu, R. A. (2019). Analiza cotei efective de impozitare a profitului companiilor [Analysis of the effective corporate income tax rate]. Editura Economică.
   Google Scholar
• Păunescu, R., A., & Vintilă, G. (2018). Study of influence factors of effective corporate tax rate from the Baltic Countries. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, 2018, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Perpelea, S. G., & Beldiman, D. (2016). Tax Evasion in Romania, pp. New Approaches. Journal of Finance Challenges for the Future Universitaria Publishing House, 16(18), 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, A. M., & Cochinţu, I. (2014). Legal regulation of the fight against and prevention of tax evasion by ways of legislative delegation. Constitutional limits. AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, 1, 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax-avoidance activities of U.S. multinational firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20 (4), 805–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1506/VANN-B7UB-GMFA-9E6W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., & Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform, evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., Lanis, R., & Leung, S. C. M. (2014). Corporate tax aggressiveness, outside directors, and debt policy. An empirical analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 107–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., Lanis, R., & Taylor, G. (2015a). Financial distress, outside directors and corporate tax aggressiveness spanning the global financial crisis. An empirical analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 112–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness. An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2015b). The impact of financial distress on corporate tax avoidance spanning the global financial crisis. Economic Modelling, 44, 44–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J. (1972). The relationship between economic structure and the effect of political influence: Empirical evidence from the corporation income tax program [Ph.D. dissertation]. cited in Stickney and McGee. (University of Wisconsin) (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Socoliuc, M., Mihalciuc, C., & Cosmulese, G. (2018). Tax Evasion in Romania – Between Past and Present. In The 14th Economic International Conference: Strategies and Development Policies of Territories: International, Country, Region, City, Location Challenges, May 10-11, 2018, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, LUMEN Proceedings, 406-412.
   Google Scholar
• Stickney, C., & McGee, V. (1982). Effective corporate tax rates – The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(82)80004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steijvers, T., & Niskanen, M. (2014). Tax aggressiveness in private family firms, An agency perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Șuvelea, M. (2014). Causes of tax evasion and how to reduce it. Hyperion Economic Journal, 4(2), 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Țâțu, L., Dragotă, V., & Vintilă N. (2011). An observation on the effective tax rate for corporate income in Romania. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 45(1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2012). International corporate tax avoidance practices: evidence from Australian firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 47, 469–496.
   Google Scholar
• Teodorescu, M., & Istudor, I. I. (2017). Effective tax rate of corporate income tax in the post-crisis period, the case of non-financial companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Ovidius’ University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 17(2), 655–661.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, M., & Watrin, C. (2018). Tax avoidance over time: A comparison of European and U.S. firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 33, 40–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Ungureanu, M. A., Calugareanu, M., Caraus, M., & Bartalis, A. M. (2016). Conceptual approaches to tax evasion in Romania. Romanian Economic Business Review, 11(3), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vintilă, G., Armeanu, D., Filipescu, O., Moscalu, M., & Lazăr, P. (2011). Fiscal policy impact upon European and National Entrepreneurial Environment. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 5(58), 352–359.
   Google Scholar
• Vintilă, G., Armeanu, D., Filipescu, O., Moscalu, M., & Lazăr, P. (2012). Study regarding fiscal policy – Corporative social responsibility correlation. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 4(569), 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Vintilă, G., Gherghina, ŞC., & Păunescu, R. A. (2018). Study of effective corporate tax rate and its influential factors: empirical evidence from emerging European Markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1418317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintilă, G., & Păunescu, R. A. (2016). Empirical approach for the US companies in dual perspectives: Effective tax rates and the remuneration of CEO. Journal of Financial Studies & Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5171/2016.493082
   Google Scholar
• Vintilă, G., Păunescu, R. A., & Ghergina, ŞC. (2016). Exploring the link between corporate governance characteristics and effective corporate tax rate: A panel data approach on U.S. listed companies. Journal of Financial Studies & Research, 1(2016), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vintilă, G., Păunescu, R., A., & Gherghina, Ş.C. (2017). Determinants of effective corporate tax rate. Empirical evidence from listed companies in Eastern European Stock Exchanges. [Special. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XXIV(Special issue), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Whait, R., Christ, K., Ortas, E., & Burritt, R. (2018). What do we know about tax aggressiveness and corporate social responsibility? An integrative review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 542–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, B., Cahan, S., & Jones, G. (2001). Strategies and dividend imputation: the effect of foreign and domestic ownership on average effective tax rates. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10, 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, T. (2011). Institutional environment, inside ownership and effective tax rate. Nankai Business Review International, 2(4), 348–357.
   Google Scholar