Research on the impact of merger on capacity and social welfare in different market environments

References

• Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00079-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, C. C., Ee, M., & Wang, L. (2018). Public firms' merger, employment, and welfare in developing countries: A general equilibrium analysis. Review of Development Economics, 22(2), 727–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (1990). Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review, 80(1), 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K. (2015). Mixed oligopoly and privatization in general equilibrium. Discussion Paper Series 137, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, K. (2020). Mixed duopoly in quantity competition under the optimal privatization rate. Economics Bulletin, 40(1), 689–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, J., Chen, H., & Zhao, F. (2019). The Chinese welfare philosophy in light of the traditional concept of family. International Social Work, 62(1), 224–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817721736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraguchi, J., & Matsumura, T. (2016). Cournot–Bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 117(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-015-0452-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O., & Zingales, L. (2017). Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 2(2), 247–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, K., & Matsumura, T. (2019). Comparing welfare and profit in quantity and price competition within Stackelberg mixed duopolies. Journal of Economics, 126(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-018-0603-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J., & Wang, X. H. (2005). On welfare under Cournot and Bertrand competition in differentiated oligopolies. Review of Industrial Organization, 27(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-005-1753-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S., Konrad, K. A., & Müller, W. (2004). Profitable horizontal mergers without cost advantages: The role of internal organization, information and market structure. Economica, 71(284), 575–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0427.2004.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, T., & Nakamura, Y. (2007). Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: The managerial delegation case. Economics Bulletin, 12(27), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Wang, X. H., & Yang, B. Z. (2012). Strategic choice of channel structure in an oligopoly. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(7–8), 565–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2568
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Luo, T., & Tian, G. G. (2019). How do political connections cause SOEs and non-SOEs to make different M&A decisions/performance? Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance, 59(4), 2579–2619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00051-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcafee, R. P., & Williams, M. A. (1992). Horizontal mergers and antitrust policy. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2950509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, W. C., & Schneider, N. (1966). Government firms in oligopoly industries: A short-run analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(3), 400–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1880727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouattara, K. S. (2015). Incentives to merge in asymmetric mixed oligopoly. Economics Bulletin, 35(2), 885–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouattara, K. S. (2016). How privatization affects the strategic choice of managerial incentives: The case of international mixed duopoly. Economics Bulletin, 36(2), 1038–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouattara, K. S. (2017). Strategic privatization in a mixed duopoly with a socially responsible firm. Economics Bulletin, 37(3), 2067–2075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. K., & Porter, R. H. (1985). Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger. American Economic Review, 75(1), 219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salant, S., Switzer, S., & Reynolds, R. (1983). Losses due to Merger: The effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on Coumot-Nash equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1885620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, A., Zhu, Y., & Zou, X. (2013). Welfare comparison of leader-follower models in a mixed duopoly. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/320712
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1988). Regulation of privatised firms in Britain. European Economic Review, 32(2–3), 465–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90192-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Tarba, S. Y., & Giuice, M. D. (2020). The micro-foundations of strategic ambidexterity: Chinese cross-border M&As, mid-view thinking and integration. International Business Review, 29(6), 101710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B., Guo, J., Hua, J., & Doukas, A. J. (2015). Does state ownership drive M&A performance? Evidence from China. European Financial Management, 21(1), 79–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar