Dynamic reference point method with probabilistic linguistic information based on the regret theory for public health emergency decision-making

References

• Altay, N., & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision-making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961–981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, J. H., Xian, S. D., & Lu, S. C. (2021). Z-uncertain probabilistic linguistic variables and its application in emergency decision making for treatment of COVID-19 patients. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(1), 362–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G. (2012). Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria. Transportmetrica, 8(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2010.498391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X. F., & Liu, H. C. (2019a). A new approach for emergency decision‐making based on zero‐sum game with Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic variables. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(7), 1667–1684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X. F., & Liu, H. C. (2019b). An extended prospect theory-VIKOR approach for emergency decision making with 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information. Soft Computing, 23(22), 12139–12150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04092-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X. F., Liu, H. C., & Shi, H. (2019). A dynamic approach for emergency decision making based on prospect theory with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic variables. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 131, 57–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, X. Q., Liu, Q., & Wei, C. P. (2019). Probabilistic linguistic QUALIFLEX approach with possibility degree comparison. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(1), 719–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2017). A dynamic reference point method for emergency response under hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(5), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0311-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, L., Mourits, M., Kristensen, A. R., & Huirne, R. (2010). A modelling approach to support dynamic decision-making in the control of FMD epidemics. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 95(3–4), 167–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X. M., Yu, C. R., & Wu, Z. H. (2019). An extension of regret theory based on probabilistic linguistic cloud sets considering dual expectations: An application for the stock market. IEEE Access, 7, 171046–171060. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., Lei, F., Wei, G. W., Wang, R., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2019). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic uncertain linguistic information and its application to green supplier selection. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 12(2), 1361–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y. H., Guo, H. W., Jin, M. Z., & Ren, P. Y. (2016). A linguistic entropy weight method and its application in linguistic multi-attribute group decision making. Nonlinear Dynamics, 84(1), 399–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2595-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health.people.com.cn. (2020). National health commission (NHC): 1749 newly confirmed cases from 0:00 to 24:00 on February 18. http://health.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0219/c14739-31593756.html
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. P., Fan, Z. P., & Su, M. M. (2011). Study on the dynamic adjusting method for emergency decision. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 19(5), 104–108.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, F., Wei, G. W., Gao, H., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2020). TOPSIS method for developing supplier selection with probabilistic linguistic information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), 749–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00797-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P., & Wei, C. P. (2019). An emergency decision‐making method based on D‐S evidence theory for probabilistic linguistic term sets. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 37, 101178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Ren, R., Leung, K. S. M., Lau, E. H. Y., Wong, J. Y., Xing, X., Xiang, N., Wu, Y., Li, C., Chen, Q., Li, D., Liu, T., Zhao, J., Liu, M., … Feng, Z. (2020). Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(13), 1199–1207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H. C., Mi, X. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2020). A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 19(1), 81–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-019-09309-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A. J., Qiu, H. W., Lu, H., & Guo, X. R. (2019). A consensus model of probabilistic linguistic preference relations in group decision making based on feedback mechanism. IEEE Access, 7, 148231–148244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. D., & Teng, F. (2018). Some Muirhead mean operators for probabilistic linguistic term sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making. Applied Soft Computing, 68, 396–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 805–824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca, D., Beroggi, G., & Wallace, W. A. (2001). Decision support for improvisation during emergency response operations. International Journal of Emergency Management, 1(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2001.000507
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2020). Preliminary accounting results of GDP for the first quarter of 2020. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202004/t20200420_1739811.html
   Google Scholar
• Pan, L., Ren, P. J., & Xu, Z. S. (2018). Therapeutic schedule evaluation for brain-metastasized non-small cell lung cancer with a probabilistic linguistic ELECTRE II method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. S. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, X. D., & Li, W. Q. (2019). Algorithms for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets in emergency decision making based on multiparametric similarity measures and WDBA. IEEE Access, 7, 7419–7441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Liao, H. C., & Kou, G. (2020). Type alpha and type gamma consensus for multi-stage emergency group decision making based on mining consensus sequences. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1830724
   Google Scholar
• The 2019-nCoV Outbreak Joint Field Epidemiology Investigation Team & Li, Q. (2020). Notes from the field: An outbreak of NCIP (2019-nCoV) infection in China – Wuhan, Hubei Province, 2019-2020. China CDC Weekly, 2(5), 79–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2020.022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian, G., Zhang, H., Feng, Y., Jia, H., Zhang, C., Jiang, Z., Li, Z., & Li, P. (2017). Operation patterns analysis of automotive components remanufacturing industry development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1363–1375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, G., Zhang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, D., Peng, Y., & Jia, H. (2018). Green decoration materials selection under interior environment characteristics: A grey-correlation based hybrid MCDM method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(1), 682–692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Xu, Z. S., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). Modeling complex linguistic expressions in qualitative decision making: An overview. Knowledge-Based Systems, 144, 174–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. D., Pan, X. H., Yan, J., Yao, J. L., & He, S. F. (2020). A projection-based regret theory method for multi-attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy sets environment. Information Sciences, 512, 108–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhang, Z. X., & Wang, Y. M. (2015). A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9379–9388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. W., Lei, F., Lin, R., Wang, R., Wei, Y., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2020). Algorithms for probabilistic uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making based on the GRA and CRITIC method: Application to location planning of electric vehicle charging stations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 828–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. W., Lu, J. P., Wei, C., & Wu, J. (2020). Probabilistic linguistic GRA method for multiple attribute group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(4), 4721–4732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. W., Wei, C., Wu, J., & Wang, H. J. (2019). Supplier selection of medical consumption products with a probabilistic linguistic MABAC method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5082. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2020). WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2020). WHO timeline - COVID-19. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline–-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X. L., Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., Hafezalkotob, A., & Herrera, F. (2018). Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: A multicriteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved Borda rule. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3688–3702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2843330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X. H., Pan, B., & Yang, Y. S. (2018). Large-group risk dynamic emergency decision method based on the dual influence of preference transfer and risk preference. Soft Computing, 22(22), 7479–7490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3387-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X. B., Chen, H., & Ji, Z. H. (2019). Combination of probabilistic linguistic term sets and PROMETHEE to evaluate meteorological disaster risk: Case study of southeastern China. Sustainability, 11(5), 1405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. T., Zhu, J. J., Liu, X. D., & Chen, Y. (2016). Regret theory method-based group decision-making with multidimensional preference and incomplete weight information. Information Fusion, 31, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. L., & Xing, X. M. (2017). Probabilistic linguistic VIKOR method to evaluate green supply chain initiatives. Sustainability, 9(7), 1231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. X., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2017). A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 414, 260–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. X., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2019). Water security evaluation based on the TODIM method with probabilistic linguistic term sets. Soft Computing, 23(15), 6215–6230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3276-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Wang, Y. M., Zhang, K., & Liang, J. (2020). A dynamic emergency decision-making method based on group decision making with uncertainty information. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(5), 667–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00308-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Wu, X. H., Xu, Z. S., & Fujita, H. (2018). Emergency decision making for natural disasters: An overview. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 567–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar