A multidimensional decision with nested probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in corporate investment

References

• Abdel-Basset, M., Saleh, M., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2019). An approach of TOPSIS technique for developing supplier selection with group decision making under type-2 neutrosophic number. Applied Soft Computing, 77, 438–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (1), 85–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Gu, J., & Xu, Z. S. (2018). Venture capital group decision-making with interaction under probabilistic linguistic environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 140, 82–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, F. (2009). Financial liberalization, private investment and portfolio choice: Financialization of real sectors in emerging markets. Journal of Development Economics, 88(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer, H., Yuksel, S., & Martinez, L. (2020). A comparative analysis of incremental and disruptive innovation policies in the European banking sector with hybrid interval Type-2 fuzzy decision-making models. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22 (4), 1158–1176. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00851-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchin, R., Thomas, G., Jarrad, H., & Christopher,. (2017). Precautionary savings with risky assets: When cash is not cash. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 793–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, X. J., Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Herrera, F. (2017). Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: A case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures. Information Fusion, 38, 22–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, X. J., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2017). Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Soft Computing, 21(21), 6515–6529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2211-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8 (6), 746–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M. M., Liu, M. K., & Lan, J. B. (2020). Decision making with both diversity supporting and opposing membership information. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 3427–3452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1774790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikram, M., Zhang, Q. Y., & Sroufe, R. (2020). Developing integrated management systems using an AHP-Fuzzy VIKOR approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29 (6), 2265–2283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. (2020). A novel decision-making method using R-Norm concept and VIKOR approach under picture fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 147, 113228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, F., Wei, G. W., Gao, H., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2020). TOPSIS method for developing supplier selection with probabilistic linguistic information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22 (3), 749–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00797-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. D., Wang, Z. W., Zhang, S. T., & Liu, J. S. (2020). Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making based on regret theory for the evaluation of venture capital projects. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 672–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1697327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiraji, H. A., Zavadskas, E. K., Skare, M., Kafshgar, F. Z. R., & Arab, A. (2020). Evaluating strategies for implementing industry 4.0: a hybrid expert oriented approach of BWM and interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 1600–1620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1753090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega, 96, 102075. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opler, T., Lee, Pi, René, S., & Rohan, W. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering Belgrade, 2, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156 (2), 445–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. S. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital disadvantage: America’s falling capital investment system. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 65–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, T., Ali, S. M., Moktadir, M. A., & Kusi-Sarpong, S. (2020). Evaluating barriers to implementing green supply chain management: An example from an emerging economy. Production Planning & Control, 31(8), 673–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1674939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, R. M., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20 (1), 109–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, J. X., Zhang, C. S., & Zheng, N. (2020). Financialization and sluggish fixed investment in Chinese real sector firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 1106–1116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M. L. (2017). Using social media and qualitative and quantitative information scales to benchmark corporate sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 727–738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türkşen, I. B. (2002). Type 2 representation and reasoning for CWW. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 127 (1), 17–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Xu, Z. S., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). Linguistic terms with weakened hedges: A model for qualitative decision making under uncertainty. Information Sciences, 433-434, 37–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. X., Xu, Z. S., & Gou, X. J. (2019). Nested probabilistic-numerical linguistic term sets in two-stage multi-attribute group decision making. Applied Intelligence, 49 (7), 2582–2602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1392-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. X., Xu, Z. S., & Gou, X. J. (2020). Allocation of fresh water recourses in China with nested probabilistic-numerical linguistic information in multi-objective optimization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 188, 105014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. X., Xu, Z. S., Gou, X. J., & Trajkovic, L. (2020). Tracking a maneuvering target by multiple sensors using extended kalman filter with nested probabilistic-numerical linguistic information. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 28 (2), 346–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2906577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. X., Xu, Z. S., Gou, X. J., & Xu, M. (2019). Distance and similarity measures for nested probabilistic-numerical linguistic term sets applied to evaluation of medical treatment. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21 (5), 1306–1329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00625-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. W., He, Y., Lei, F., Wu, J., Wei, C., & Guo, Y. F. (2020a). Green supplier selection with an uncertain probabilistic linguistic MABAC method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39 (3), 3125–3136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G. W., Lu, J. P., Wei, C., & Wu, J. (2020c). Probabilistic linguistic GRA method for multiple attribute group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38 (4), 4721–4732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G., Lei, F., Lin, R., Wang, R., Wei, Y., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2020b). Algorithms for probabilistic uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making based on the GRA and CRITIC method: application to location planning of electric vehicle charging stations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 828–846. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2019). A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. European Journal of Operational Research, 272 (3), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. (2004). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166(1-4), 19–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975). Concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-Part I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (2012). Computing with Words: What is computing with words (CWW)?. Springer. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, G. Z., & Wang, X. (2020). The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method. Energy, 193, 116676–116153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar