Effects of R&D, networking and leadership roles on environmental innovation adoption in Vietnam’s SMEs

References

• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, K., & Dittmar, A. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (1), 137–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., Ghisetti, C., Gilli, M., Marin, G., & Nicolli, F. (2016). A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 596–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovation. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin, J., Horbach, J., & Oltra, V. (2011). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations: An econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the community innovation survey. Cahiers du GREThA, 2011-17.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Engels, S., Kammerer, D., Seijas, J. ( (2006). ). Explaining green innovation: Ten years after porter’s win-win proposition: How to study the effects of regulation on corporate environmental innovation?. Working Paper 17 ETH, Zurich and University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, V., Iraldo, F., & Meredith, S. (2002). Achieving sustainability through environmental innovation: The role of SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(5/6), 612. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2002.003074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2016). The Pavitt taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services. Economia Politica, 33(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0035-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bönte, W., & Dienes, C. (2013). Environmental innovations and strategies for the development of new production technologies: Empirical evidence from Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(8), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghesi, S., Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M. (2012). Brown sunsets and green dawns in the industrial sector: eco innovations, firm behavior and the European emission trading. Working Paper 3. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., Montresor, S. (2011). Environmental innovations, local networks and internationalization. Working Paper. University of Trento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, S. (1990). Is gender germane? Health Progress, 71(1), 21–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 978–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaganti, R., & Sambharya, R. (1987). Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Lo, W., & Chen, K. (2019). Influence of network embeddedness and network diversity on green innovation: The mediation effect of green social capital. Sustainability, 11(20), 5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clancy, M. S., & Moschini, G. (2018, January). Mandates and the incentive for environmental innovation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(1), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2001). Geographical perspectives: An introduction to the JEG special issue ‘Mapping globalisation: Geographical perspectives on international trade and investment. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.4.367
   Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., & Nash, J. (2002). Policy options for improving environmental management in the private sector. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 44(9), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2002.10543559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corral, C. (2003). Sustainable production and consumption systems-cooperation for change: Assessing and simulating the willingness of the firm to adopt/develop cleaner technologies. The case of the In-Bond industry in northern Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuerva, M. C., Triguero-Cano, A., & Corcoles, D. (2014). Drivers of green and non-green innovation: Empirical evidence in low-tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2013). Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: The case of Italian manufacturing firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas, M. (2000). Barriers and Incentives to the adoption of ISO 14001 in the United States. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum. Retrieved September 23, 2020, from https://www.ioes.ucla.edu/publication/barriers-incentives-adoption-iso-14001-united-states/
   Google Scholar
• Dermody, J., & Hammer-Lloyd, S. (1996). Greening new product development: The pathway to corporate environmental excellence. In P. McDonagh, A. Prothero (Eds.), Green management (pp. 367–387). Dryden
   Google Scholar
• Derry, R. (1987). Moral reasoning inwork-related conflicts. Research in corporate social performance and policy. (Vol. 9). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, R. (1989). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management, 31, 659–669.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [Database] https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management, 23, 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elm, D. R., Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (2001). Determinants of moral reasoning: Sex role orientation, gender, and academic factors. Business & Society, 40(3), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000302
   Google Scholar
• Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (3), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forte, A. (2004). Antecedents of managers’ moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(4), 313–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000032501.59580.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath, J. (2017). Drivers of green innovations: The impact of export intensity, women leaders, and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3715-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2008). Productivity effects of environmental performance: Evidence from TFP analysis on marketing cooperatives. Applied Economics, 40(14), 1873–1888. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600905266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K., McMeekin, A., & Irwin, A. (1994). Technological trajectories and R&D for environmental innovation in UK firms. Futures, 26(10), 1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90072-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, L. T., Nam, P. X., & Thanh, T. T. (2021). Effects of bribery on firms’ environmental innovation adoption in Vietnam: Mediating roles of firms’ bargaining power and credit and institutional constraints. Ecological Economics, 185, 107042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halila, F. (2007). Networks as a means of supporting the adoption of organizational innovation in SMEs: The case of environmental management systems (EMSs) based on ISO 14001. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.127
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruna, S., & Goel, R. K. (2019). Optimal pollution control in a mixed oligopoly with research spillovers. Australian Economic Papers, 58 (1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P., W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmelskamp, J. ( (1999). ). The influence of environmental policy on innovative behaviour: An econometric study. Working Paper 18. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
   Google Scholar
• Hillary, R. (2000). Small and medium sized enterprises and the environment business imperatives. Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation: New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impactdthe role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. (2004). The necessary nature of future firms: Attributes of survivors in a changing world. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Inigo, E., Ritala, P., & Albareda, L. (2020). Networking for sustainability: Alliance capabilities and sustainability-oriented innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 550–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. W., & Schøtt, T. (2015). Start-up firms’ networks for innovation and export: Facilitated and constrained by entrepreneurs’ networking in private and public spheres. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-015-0287-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G., Panayiotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and environmental sustainability: A longitudinal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Arundel, A. ( (1998). ). Survey indicators for environmental innovation. IDEA (Indicators and Data for European Analysis), Report 8/1998.
   Google Scholar
• Leistner, M. (1999). The growth and environment scheme. Greener Management International, 1999(27), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3062.1999.au.00009
   Google Scholar
• Leonidou, L., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Internal drivers and performance consequences of small firm green business strategy: The moderating role of external forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2670-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden, D. P., Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2014). A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 43(7), 1157–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38 (1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipparini, A., & Sobrero, M. (1994). The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokshin, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Letterie, W. (2011). The bumpy road of technology partnerships: Understanding causes and consequences of partnershipmal-functioning. Research Policy, 40(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Bryson, J. R. (2011). Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in U.K. business services. Research Policy, 40(10), 1438–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1968). Industrial research and technological innovation. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2011). Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review, 101 (3), 635–639. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, S., & Biondi, V. (1997). Motivating mechanisms and policy options in the diffusion of environmental technologies within small and medium sized companies in the electroplating industry [Paper presentation].Preliminary Findings of a European Project: Conference Paper, Proceedings of the 7th International Forum on Technology Management, Kyoto, Japan, November.
   Google Scholar
• Midavaine, J., Dolfsma, W., & Aalbers, R. (2016). Board diversity and R&D investment. Management Decision, 54(3), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2014-0574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, M., & Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Laoire, D. (1994). Environmental management and industrial competitiveness: Issues for a new ISO standard. Eco-Management and Auditing, 3(3), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the Tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2015). Material resources, productivity and the environment, OECD green growth studies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190504-en
   Google Scholar
• Pal, R., & Saha, B. (2015). Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1108–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partanen, J., Chetty, S. K., & Rajala, A. (2011). Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (3), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation, 13(6), 343–373.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harperand Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkse, J., & Gasbarro, F. (2019). Managing physical impacts of climate change: An attentional perspective on corporate adaptation. Business & Society, 58(2), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316648688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 56, 137–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, K. M., Rennings, K., & Ziegler, A. (2007). Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., Hoffmann, E., Nill, J. (2003). The Influence of the EU Environmental Management and Auditing Scheme on Environmental Innovations and Competitiveness in Germany: an Analysis on the Basis of Case Studies and a Large-Scale Survey, ZEW Discussion Paper 03–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltenbrand, B., Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., & Lindeman, K. (2018). See what you want to see? The effects of managerial experience on corporate green investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schøtt, T., & Jensen, K. W. (2016). Firm’s innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of nation and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schøtt, T., & Sedaghat, M. (2014). Innovation embedded in entrepreneurs networks and national educational systems: A global study. Small Business Economics, 43 (2), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9546-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Pablo, A. L., & Vredenburg, H. (1999). Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886399351008
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2009). Power relations, industrial clusters, and regional transformations: Pan-European integration and outward processing in the Slovak clothing industry. Economic Geography, 79(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00200.x
   Google Scholar
• Soucek, R., & Moser, K. (2010). Coping with information overload in email communication: Evaluation of a training intervention. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1458–1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, M., & Tiwari, P. (2004). ISO 14001 and the reduction of toxic emissions. The Journal of Policy Reform, 7(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1384128042000219717
   Google Scholar
• Terjesen, S., Bosma, N., & Stam, E. (2016). Advancing public policy for high-growth, female, and social entrepreneurs. Public Administration Review, 76 (2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. S., Litschert, R. J., & Ramaswamy, K. (1991). The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. H., Wang, C. C., & Chiou, J. R. (2016). Can privatization be a catalyst for environmental R&D and result in a cleaner environment? Resource and Energy Economics, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Brust, D., & Liston-Heyes, C. (2010). Environmental management intentions: An empirical investigation of Argentina’s polluting firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(5), 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K., Ni, N., & Huo, W. (2014). In the Red Dragon green? An examination of the antecedents and consequences of environmental proactivity in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1903-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T. K., & Wan, P. (2011). Perceptions and determinants of environmental concern: The case of Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 19(4), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., Tan, T. T., & Wang, X. (2019). Environmental R&D subsidy, spillovers and privatization in a mixed duopoly. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32 (1), 2995–3015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1658530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., Tan, T. T., Wang, X., & Liu, L. L. (2020). Environmental R&D and privatization in a mixed duopoly market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41 (1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2016). Women, Naturally Better Leaders for the 21st Century, Transpersonal Leadership Series: White Paper Two, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar