Environmental taxes and the effects of partial privatization on environmental R&D, environment and welfare

References

• Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hemous, D., Martin, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/684581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. Y., & Nie, P. Y. (2016). Effects of carbon tax on social welfare: A case study of China. Applied Energy, 183, 1607–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. A., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Privatization in a mixed duopoly with environmental taxes. In AIP Conference Proceedings (pp. 1558–1561).
   Google Scholar
• Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2007). End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(8), 571–584. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.496
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., Leal, M., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Optimal policy mix in an endogenous timing with a consumer-friendly public firm. Economics Bulletin, 38(3), 1438–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., Leal, M., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Time-inconsistent environmental policies with a consumer-friendly firm: Tradable permits versus emission tax. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., Leal, M., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Endogenous timing with a socially responsible firm. Korean Economic Review, 35(2), 345–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Moltó, M. J., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Zikos, V. (2011). R&D subsidies, spillovers and privatization in mixed markets. Southern Economic Journal, 78(1), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.1.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Moltó, M. J., & Varvarigos, D. (2014). Environmental investments in mixed vs private oligopoly: What are the implications of privatization? Working Papers 2014018. The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Haruna, S., & Goel, R. K. (2019). Optimal pollution control in a mixed oligopoly with research spillovers. Australian Economic Papers, 58(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. S., & Ye, G. L. (2009). Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly with an R&D rivalry. Bulletin of Economic Research, 61(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2008.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, K. (2013). Optimal degree of privatization and the environmental problem. Journal of Economics, 110(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0316-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, K. (2010). Partial privatization and environmental policies. MPRA Paper 27630. University Library of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, M., Garcia, A., & Lee, S. H. (2018). The timing of environmental tax policy with a consumer-friendly firm. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 59(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H. (1999). Optimal taxation for polluting oligopolists with endogenous market structure. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 15(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008034415251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Muminov, T. K., & Tomaru, Y. (2017). Partial privatization and subsidization in a mixed duopoly: R&D versus output subsidies. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 58(2), 163–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., & Park, C. H. (2021). Environmental regulations in private and mixed duopolies: Taxes on emissions versus green R&D subsidies. Economic Systems, 45(1), 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., & Xu, L. L. (2018). Endogenous timing in private and mixed duopolies with emission taxes. Journal of Economics, 124(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0565-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00051-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maw, J. (2002). Partial privatization in transition economies. Economic Systems, 26(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-3625(02)00047-X
   Google Scholar
• Ohori, S. (2006). Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 29(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-6037-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohori, S. (2014). Price and quantity competition in a mixed duopoly with emission tax. Theoretical Economics Letters, 04(02), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2014.42020
   Google Scholar
• Ouattara, K. S. (2019). Pollution abatement and partial privatization. Economics Bulletin, 39(3), 1887–1897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R., & Saha, B. (2015). Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R., & Saha, B. (2010). Does partial privatization improve the environment. Mumbai Working Papers, 2010–2018. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The Economic Journal, 101(407), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, J. C., & Guan, Y. W. (2018). Privatization, pollution, and welfare in a mixed differentiated duopoly. Panoeconomicus, 65(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN130909001P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyago-Thotoky, J. (2003). Optimal environmental taxation, R&D subsidization and the role of market conduct. Finnish Economic Papers, 16(1), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Poyago-Thotoky, J. (2007). The organization of R&D and environmental policy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(1), 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requate, T. (2005). Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments-a survey. Ecological Economics, 54(2–3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skea, J. (1995). Environmental technology. In H. Folmer, H. L. Gabel, & H. Opschoor (Eds.), Principles of environmental and resource economics. A guide for students and decision-makers (pp. 389–412). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. H., Wang, C. C., & Chiou, J. R. (2016). Can privatization be a catalyst for environmental R&D and result in a cleaner environment? Resource and Energy Economics, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. F. S., & Wang, J. (2009). Environmental taxes in a differentiated mixed duopoly. Economic Systems, 33(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. F. S., Wang, Y. C., & Zhao, L. H. (2009). Privatization and the environment in a mixed duopoly with pollution abatement. Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 3112–3119.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., & Tan, T. T. (2021). Environmental attitudes and impacts of privatization on R&D, environment and welfare in a mixed duopoly. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1804968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., Tan, T. T., & Xia, W. (2019). Environmental R&D subsidy, spillovers and privatization in a mixed duopoly. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2995–3015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1658530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., Tan, T. T., Xia, W., & Liu, L. L. (2020). Environmental R&D and privatization in a mixed duopoly market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. L., Cho, S., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot-Bertrand comparison. Economic Modelling, 55, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. L., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Environmental policies with excess burden of taxation in free entry mixed markets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. N. (2018). Privatization of state-owned enterprises, environmental protection tax and social welfare. Business & Economy, 35(4), 124–128.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef, S. B., & Dinar, Z. (2011). Regulation of a duopoly and environmental R&D. Environmental Economics, 2(3), 47–51.
   Google Scholar