Green financing of eco-innovations: is the gender inclusivity taken care of?

References

• Abbasi, K. R., Hussain, K., Haddad, A. M., Salman, A., & Ozturk, I. (2022). The role of financial development and technological innovation towards sustainable development in Pakistan: Fresh insights from consumption and territory-based emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu, A. (2020). Gender and innovation: Implications for sustainable development: A GenderInSITE policy brief. Academy of Science of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Agirman, E., & Osman, A. B. (2019). Green finance for sustainable development: A theoretical study. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 243–253.
   Google Scholar
• Alola, A. A., Ozturk, I., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Is clean energy prosperity and technological innovation rapidly mitigating sustainable energy-development deficit in selected sub-Saharan Africa? A myth or reality. Energy Policy, 158, 112520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjertnaes, G. H. (2021). Taxation of fuel and vehicles when emissions are constrained. Discussion Paper No. 949, Statistisk sentralbyrå.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Evans, K. P. (2018). Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 48, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbatiss, J. (2021). Analysis: Why climate-finance ‘flows’ are falling short of $100bn pledge. Carbon Brief. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-climate-finance-flows-are-falling-short-of-100bn-pledge
   Google Scholar
• Gabbi, G., Ticci, E., Vercelli, A., & Hall, C. (2016). Financialization, economy, society and sustainable development: A European Union sustainable banking network. European Policy Brief.
   Google Scholar
• Galia, F., Zenou, E., & Ingham, M. (2015). Board composition and environmental innovation: Does gender diversity matter? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(1), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2015.066152
   Google Scholar
• García‐Sánchez, I. M., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Zafra‐Gómez, J. L. (2021). Do independent, female and specialist directors promote eco‐innovation and eco‐design in agri‐food firms? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1136–1152. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., Schmidt, T. S., & Steffen, B. (2018). The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: An analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany. Energy Policy, 115, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godil, D. I., Sharif, A., Ali, M. I., Ozturk, I., & Usman, R. (2021). The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: New evidence from the QARDL approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 285, 112208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazzi, M. (2018). The importance of promoting gender equality in science and technology-based entrepreneurship and innovation activities. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, I., Byrne, E., Glatz-Schmallegger, M., Harris, C., Hynes, W., Keohane, K., & Gallachóir, B. Ó. (2020). Deep institutional innovation for sustainability and human development. University College Cork.
   Google Scholar
• International Development Innovation Alliance (IDIA). (2018). Toward bridging gender equality & innovation. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b156e3bf2e6b10bb0788609/t/5f030fed7a120233c35ba078/1594036220003/Toward+Bridging+Gender+Equality+%26+Innovation_FNL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2020). Making finance flows consistent with the Paris agreement. https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/policy-briefs/making-finance-flows-consistent-with-the-paris-agreement/
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. A., Yousuf, S., Hossain, K. F., & Islam, M. R. (2014). Green financing in Bangladesh: Challenges and opportunities–a descriptive approach. International Journal of Green Economics, 8(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2014.064469
   Google Scholar
• Lilien, D. M. (1982). Sectoral shifts and cyclical unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, 90(4), 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1086/261088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B., & Ma, R. (2022). Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P. (Ed.). (2016). Debate the issues: New approaches to economic challenges. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mininni, G. M. (2022). The Barefoot College ‘eco-village’approach to women's entrepreneurship in energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. C. (2017). The Digital Transformation Imperative. An IDB Science and Business innovation Agenda for the New Industrial Revolution. Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Nosheen, M., Iqbal, J., & Abbasi, M. A. (2021). Do technological innovations promote green growth in the European Union? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(17), 21717–21729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11926-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women (OSAGI). (2001). Gender mainstreaming: Strategy for promoting gender equality. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/factsheet1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Fostering innovation for green growth. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). New approaches to economic challenges. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). The pursuit of gender equality: An uphill battle. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide: Include, upskill, innovate.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Aligning development co-operation and climate action: The only way forward.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Forum on green finance and investment 2020. Centre on Green Finance and Investment.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021a). Environment at a glance indicators. https://www.oecd.org/environment/environment-at-a-glance/
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021b). Building a gender-equal recovery. https://www.oecd-forum.org/rooms/building-a-gender-equal-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). Simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A., & Rastogi, S. K. (2017). Collaboration between central and state government and environmental quality: Evidences from Indian cities. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 8(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A., Mishra, S., Sharif, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2021). Does green financing help to improve environmental & social responsibility? Designing SDG framework through advanced quantile modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2022). The role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing environmental degradation in Malaysia: A step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy., 182, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). (2021). Sustainable Development Report 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sweezy, P. M. (1943). Professor Schumpeter’s theory of innovation. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 25(1), 93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Yoshino, N. (2020). Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects. Energies, 13(4), 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. H., & Liao, Y. C. (2017). Sustainability strategy and eco‐innovation: A moderation model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2018). Trade in environmentally sound technologies: Implications for Developing Countries.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2018). Manufacturing development in catching up countries: Locating demand-driven policy interventions from a long-term perspective. Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series, WP. 18.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2020). Industrial Development Report 2020: Industrializing in the digital age. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2021a). World development indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2021b). Worldwide governance indicators. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., & Malcom, S. (2017). Research and knowledge (S&T) needed to get the right innovation, including grassroots knowledge. Academy of Science of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh–Hesary, F., & Nakahigashi, M. (2019). Modelling the social funding and spill-over tax for addressing the green energy financing gap. Economic Modelling, 77, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zastempowski, M., & Cyfert, S. (2021). Impact of entrepreneur's gender on innovation activities. The perspective of small businesses. Plos One, 16(10), e0258661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar