A way forward in reducing carbon emissions in environmentally friendly countries: the role of green growth and environmental taxes

References

• Aldieri, L., Makkonen, T., & Vinci, C. P. (2020). Environmental knowledge spillovers and productivity: A patent analysis for large international firms in the energy, water and land resources fields. Resources Policy, 69, 101877–101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, A., & Oguz, O. (2016). The role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth: Evidence from asymmetric causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 953–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Ozturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir, F. M., Ma, B., Bashir, M. A., Radulescu, M., & Shahzad, U. (2021). Investigating the role of environmental taxes and regulations for renewable energy consumption: Evidence from developed economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1962383.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1971). The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. In P. Bohm & A. V. Kneese (Eds.), The economics of environment (pp. 53–65). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Borozan, D. (2018). Efficiency of energy taxes and the validity of the residential electricity environmental Kuznets curve in the European Union. Sustainability, 10(7), 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosquet, B. (2000). Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00173-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B.H. Baltagi (Ed.), Advances in econometrics: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Vol. 15, pp. 161–178). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breitung, J., & Das, S. (2005). Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 59(4), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z., & Yan, C. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission – Evidence from the BRIICS . The Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1328–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, F., Sadiq, M., Nawaz, M. A., Hussain, M. S., Tran, T. D., & Le Thanh, T. (2021). A step toward reducing air pollution in top Asian economies: The role of green energy, eco-innovation, and environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, S., Zhang, M., & Song, Y. (2019). Exploring China’s carbon emissions peak for different carbon tax scenarios. Energy Policy, 129, 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, E., & Seker, F. (2016). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy., 94, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Performance Index (EPI). (2020). Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from https://epi.yale.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Fit for 55': Delivering the EU's 2030 climate Target on the way to climate neutrality (COM/2021/550 Final). European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2020). Understanding environmental taxation. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/646124/EPRS_BRI(2020)646124_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fatur Šikić, T. (2020). The impact of energy consumption on economic growth in developed and post-transition countries of European Union. Zbornik Radova Ekonomski Fakultet u Rijeci, 38(2), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire-González, J. (2018). Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(1), 194–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Working paper No. 3914. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, J., & Newey, W. (2004). Jackknife and analytical bias reduction for nonlinear panel models. Econometrica, 72(4), 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00533.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, L. N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021). Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100–1109.
   Google Scholar
• He, P., Ning, J., Yu, Z., Xiong, H., Shen, H., & Jin, H. (2019). Can environmental tax policy really help to reduce pollutant emissions? An empirical study of a panel ARDL model based on OECD countries and China. Sustainability, 11(16), 4384.
   Google Scholar
• Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2016). The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: A panel data application. Energy Economics, 53, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). World energy outlook. www.iea.org/weo
   Google Scholar
• Ji, X., Umar, M., Ali, S., Ali, W., Tang, K., & Khan, Z. (2021). Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote sustainable environment? A case study of selected fiscally decentralized countries. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J. (1997). Econometrics methods (4th ed). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kahia, M., Ben Jebli, M., & Belloumi, M. (2019). Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(4), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01676-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. A. R., Ponce, P., & Yu, Z. (2021). Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: An empirical study in the context of COP-21. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardones, C., & Baeza, N. (2018). Economic and environmental effects of a CO2 tax in Latin American countries. Energy Policy, 114, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxim, M., & Zander, K. (2019). Can a green tax reform entail employment double dividend in European and non-European countries? A survey of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7578
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. J., & Vela, M. A. (2013). Are environmentally related taxes effective? (Inter-American Development Bank Working Series No. IDB-WP-467). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2367708
   Google Scholar
• Morley, B. (2012). Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes. Applied Economics Letters, 19(18), 1817–1820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.650324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, T., Yao, X., Shao, S., Li, D., & Wang, W. (2018). Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: An estimated DSGE model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Environment at a glance: Climate change, environment at a glance: Indicators. https://www.oecd.org/environment/environment-at-a-glance-indicators-ac4b8b89-en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(Suppl 1), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. (2016). Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458157.html
   Google Scholar
• Rapanos, V. T., & Polemis, M. L. (2005). Energy demand and environmental taxes: The case of Greece. Energy Policy, 33(14), 1781–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, U. (2020). Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: Theoretical survey with policy implications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(20), 24848–24862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, U., Radulescu, M., Rahim, S., Isik, C., Yousaf, Z., & Ionescu, S. A. (2021). Do environment-related policy instruments and technologies facilitate renewable energy generation? Energies, 14(3), 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, T. (2007). Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy, 35(6), 3194–3202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S., Mishra, A. K., & Naresh, R. (2016). Effect of environmental tax on carbon dioxide emission: A mathematical model. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 4(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-4-1-3
   Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Yoshino, N. (2020). Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects. Energies, 13(4), 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucak, R., & Khan, S. U.-D. (2020). Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1992). Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development (A/CONF.151/26), Vol. I. United Nations
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1997). Report of the conference of the parties on its third session, held at Kyoto from 1 To 11 December 1997, FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1. United Nations
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Adoption of the Paris agreement (Decision 1/CP.21. Article 2.1(a)). United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Uzuner, G., Akadiri, S. S., & Lasisi, T. T. (2020). The asymmetric relationship between globalization, tourism, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Turkey: implications for environmental policy making. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(26), 32742–32753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09190-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Wang, K., Shi, X., & Wei, Y. M. (2019). Spatial heterogeneity and driving forces of environmental productivity growth in China: Would it help to switch pollutant discharge fees to environmental taxes? Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J. (2005). New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econometric Reviews, 24(3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolde-Rufael, Y., & Mulat-Weldemeskel, E. (2021). The moderating role of environmental tax and renewable energy in CO2 emissions in Latin America and Caribbean countries: evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100412
   Google Scholar
• Yao, S., Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2019). Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338–1352 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., & Managi, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 29, 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar