Privatisation policy with different oligopolistic competition in the public utilities market

References

• Anderson, S. P., de Palma, A., & Thisse, J. F. (1997). Privatization and efficiency in a differentiated industry. European Economic Review, 41(9), 1635–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00086-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajra, U. Q., Krasniqi, A., & Podvorica, A. (2021). Privatisation of socially owned enterprises, the methods used and the impact on economic growth: Empirical evidence from Kosovo. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1893201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C. (2012). Privatization when the public firm is as efficient as private enterprises. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C., & Garzón, M. B. (2020). Partial privatization in an international mixed oligopoly under product differentiation. Journal of Economics, 131(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-020-00701-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Warner, M. E. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., & Vining, A. R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. The Journal of Law and Economics, 32(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/467167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Voucher privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90006-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulow, J. I., Geanakoplos, J., & Klemperer, P. D. (1983). Multimarket oligopoly [Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers, 674].
   Google Scholar
• Casadevall, S. R. (2016). Improving the management of water multi-functionality through stakeholder involvement in decision-making processes. Utilities Policy, 43, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Shi, J., & Liu, J. (2022). Capacity sharing strategy with sustainable revenue-sharing contracts. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.16030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Tang, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Duopoly, optimal proportion of state-owned shares and international cross-ownership. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 64, 352–365. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.64.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Wang, M., Gao, Y., & Long, Y. (2019). Duopoly, mixed ownership, and the optimal proportion of employee stocks in state-owned enterprises in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(5), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Xie, X., Liu, J., & Liu, R. (2020). Externality, product differentiation and social welfare in education market. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(3C), 522–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (1994). Oligopole mixte dans un marché commun. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 33, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/20075937
   Google Scholar
• Correia-da-Silva, J., & Pinho, J. (2018). Collusion in mixed oligopolies and the coordinated effects of privatization. Journal of Economics, 124(1), 19–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0560-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2012). Mixed companies and local governance: No man can serve two masters. Public Administration, 90(3), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(1), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90009-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1990). Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economic Surveys, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1990.tb00077.x
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1987). Cointegration and error correction-representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanti, L. (2016). Social welfare and cross-ownership in a vertical industry: When the mode of competition matters for antitrust policy. Japan and the World Economy, 37-38, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K. (2007). Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 92(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0267-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, A., Romano, G., & Leardini, C. (2018). Economies of scale and density in the Italian water industry: A stochastic frontier approach. Utilities Policy, 52, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackner, J. A. (2000). Note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. Journal of Economic Theory, 93(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, R., & Pal, R. (2012). Mixed duopoly, cross-ownership and partial privatization. Journal of Economics, 107(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0260-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2004). Research on infrastructure capital and economic growth. Management Review, 16(9), 57–62 + 64.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-S. (2005). A study of reforming the state-owned enterprise of China-focusing on the reformation of the structure ownership change. The Journal of Northeast Asian Economic Studies, 17(2), 83–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-Y., & Wang, L. F. S. (2018). Foreign competition and optimal privatization with excess burden of taxation. Journal of Economics, 125(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0592-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00051-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N., & Ishibashi, I. (2009). Privatization and entries of foreign enterprises in a differentiated industry. Journal of Economics, 98(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-009-0091-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne, Q., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2018). Symposium on the politics of local public-sector reform: A global perspective on local government reinvigoration. International Public Management Journal, 21 (3), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1433938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2698243 https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.2.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteduro, F. (2014). Public-private versus public ownership and economic performance: Evidence from Italian local utilities. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9235-4
   Google Scholar
• Nie, P. Y. (2014). Effects of capacity constraints on mixed duopoly. Journal of Economics, 112(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-013-0362-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, D., & White, M. D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal, 65(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Røiseland, A. (2014). Financial gains and value loss? The impacts of local mixed companies. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12031
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., & Tavares, A. F. (2017). The same deep water as you? The impact of alternative governance arrangements of water service delivery on efficiency. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(2), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055563617728744
   Google Scholar
• Sato, S., & Matsumura, T. (2019). Dynamic privatization policy. The Manchester School, 87(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and enterprises. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00232 https://doi.org/10.2307/2118354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A. M. (1976). Product differentiation and welfare. American Economic Review, 66, 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(76)90008-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., Tian, X., Zhang, X., & Zhao, H. (2020). The real effect of partial privatization on corporate innovation: Evidence from China’s split share structure reform. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, A., Wang, X. H., & Yang, B. Z. (2018). Duopoly models with a joint capacity constraint. Journal of Economics, 125(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-018-0597-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R., & Boardman, A. E. (1992). Ownership versus competition-efficiency in public enterprise. Public Choice, 73(2), 205–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., Van Genugten, M. L., & Van Thiel, S. (2017). The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: A systematic review. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1319360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Nie, P. Y., & Cui, T. (2019). Endogenous product substitutability strategy under duopoly. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(6), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Zhou, X., Wang, J., & Li, W. (2013). Research on performance evaluation and regulation policy of privatization of urban public utilities in China (pp. 86–88). China Social Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Aldag, A. M. (2021). Re-municipalization in the US: A pragmatic response to contracting. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(3), 319–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1646133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2008). Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public-private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/25145585 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, S., Li, Y., Mao, Q., & Dong, S. (2012). The urban municipal infrastructure construction status, problem and countermeasure of China. Urban Studies, 19(5), 28–33.
   Google Scholar