487
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The local-neighborhood environmental effects of the government size expansion: evidence from China’s sulfur dioxide emission

&
Pages 6208-6232 | Received 04 Mar 2021, Accepted 24 Feb 2022, Published online: 13 Mar 2022

References

  • Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.090
  • Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877
  • Bai, J., Lu, J., & Li, S. (2019). Fiscal pressure, tax competition and environmental pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 73(2), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0269-1
  • Beck, N., & Katz, O. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
  • Bergh, A., & Karlsson, M. (2010). Government size and growth: Accounting for economic freedom and globalization. Public Choice, 142(1-2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9484-1
  • Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2013). Are bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution. Public Choice, 156(3-4), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-9916-1
  • Caldeira, E. (2012). Yardstick competition in a federation: Theory and evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 878–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2012.04.011
  • Chen, L., Xu, L., Velasco-Fernández, R., Giampietro, M., & Yang, Z. (2021). Residential energy metabolic patterns in China: A study of the urbanization process. Energy, 215, 119021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119021
  • Chen, S., & Lee, C. (2005). Government size and economic growth in Taiwan: A threshold regression approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(9), 1051–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2005.06.006
  • Chen, Y., Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Relative performance evaluation and the turnover of provincial leaders in China. Economics Letters, 88(3), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.003
  • Chien, S. S. (2010). Economic freedom and political control in Post-Mao China: A perspective of upward accountability and asymmetric decentralization. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185371003669379
  • Colombier, C. (2009). Growth effects of fiscal policies: An application of robust modified M-estimator. Applied Economics, 41(7), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701736099
  • Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87 (1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053327577
  • Galinato, G., & Islam, A. (2014). The challenge of addressing consumption pollutants with fiscal policy [Working Paper Series WP 2014–1]. School of Economic Sciences.
  • Greenstone, M., & Hanna, R. (2014). Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, and infant mortality in India. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3038–3072. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3038
  • Guo, S., Wen, L., Wu, Y., Yue, X., & Fan, G. (2020). Fiscal decentralization and local environmental pollution in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228661
  • Halkos, G. E., & Paizanos, E. Α. (2013). The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecological Economics, 91, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.002
  • Halkos, G. E., & Paizanos, E. A. (2017). The channels of the effect of government expenditure on the environment: Evidence using dynamic panel data. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1145107
  • Han, H., & Lin, S. (2019). Government size and regional capital flows in China. Sustainability, 11(23), 6653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236653
  • Huang, J. T. (2018). Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China: Evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.001
  • Jia, K., & Chen, S. (2019). Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China's central environmental protection inspection. Journal of Environmental Management, 245, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.114
  • Karras, G. (1996). The optimal government size: Further international evidence on the productivity of government services. Economic Inquiry, 34(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1996.tb01372.x
  • Kotera, G., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2012). Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling, 29(6), 2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.022
  • Kou, P., & Han, Y. (2021). Vertical environmental protection pressure, fiscal pressure, and local environmental regulations: evidence from China's industrial sulfur dioxide treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(42), 60095–60110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14947-7
  • Kou, P., Han, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). An evolutionary analysis of corruption in the process of collecting environmental tax in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(39), 54852–54862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13104-4
  • Lago-Peñas, S., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Sacchi, A. (2020). Fiscal stability during the Great Recession: putting decentralization design to the test. Regional Studies, 54(7), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1637836
  • Lee, C.-C., Chiu, Y.-B., & Sun, C.-H. (2009). Does one size fit all? A reexamination of the environmental Kuznets curve using the dynamic panel data approach. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(4), 751–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01465.x
  • Li, H., & Li, B. (2019). The threshold effect of environmental regulation on the green transition of the industrial economy in China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 3134–3149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1661001
  • Liang, J., & Langbein, L. (2015). Performance management, high-powered incentives, and environmental policies in China. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 346–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1043167
  • Lin, S. A. Y. (1994). Government spending and economic growth. Applied Economics, 26(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849400000064
  • López, R., Galinato, G. I., & Islam, A. (2011). Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.001
  • López, R., & Palacios, A. (2014). Why has Europe become environmentally cleaner? Decomposing the roles of fiscal, trade and environmental policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9692-5
  • Mantovani, A., Tarola, O., & Vergari, C. (2017). End-of-pipe or cleaner production? How to go green in presence of income inequality and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.110
  • Qian, Y., & Roland, G. (1998). Federalism and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review, 88(5), 1143–1162. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.149988
  • Ran, R. (2013). Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China's local environmental politics. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.752186
  • Sun, J. (1998). Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model. Energy Economics, 20(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00012-1
  • Swanson, K. E., Kuhn, R. G., & Xu, W. (2001). Environmental policy implementation in rural China: A case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang. Environmental Management, 27(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010164
  • Vega, S. H., & Elhorst, J. P. (2015). The SLX model. Journal of Regional Science, 55(3), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12188
  • Wang, M. (1998). Research on the government's reasonable scale and its standard. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 11, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.1998.11.004 (in Chinese)
  • Wang, Q. S., Su, C. W., Hua, Y. F., & Umar, M. (2021). Can fiscal decentralisation regulate the impact of industrial structure on energy efficiency? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1727–1751. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1845969
  • Wang, S., Wang, H., & Sun, Q. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental pollution in China: Corruption matters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186477
  • Wang, S., Yuan, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). Corruption, hidden economy and environmental pollution: A spatial econometric analysis based on China's provincial panel data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162871
  • Wang, X. (2013). Local official governance and regional development. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 19(5), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2013.05.003 (in Chinese)
  • Wu, G., Baležentis, T., Sun, C., & Xu, S. (2019). Source control or end-of-pipe control: Mitigating air pollution at the regional level from the perspective of the total factor productivity change decomposition. Energy Policy, 129, 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.032
  • Zhang, H. (2016). Strategic interaction of regional environmental regulation: An explanation on the universality of incomplete enforcement of environmental regulation. China Industrial Economics, 7, 74–90. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2016.07.006 (in Chinese)
  • Zhang, P. (2013). End-of-pipe or process-integrated: Evidence from LMDI decomposition of China's SO2 emission density reduction. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(6), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0541-0
  • Zhang, Q., Zhang, S., Ding, Z., & Hao, Y. (2017). Does government expenditure affect environmental quality? Empirical evidence using Chinese city-level data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.096
  • Zhang, Z., Jin, T., & Meng, X. (2020). From race-to-the-bottom to strategic imitation: how does political competition impact the environmental enforcement of local governments in China? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(20), 25675–25688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09003-9
  • Zhao, H., Cao, X., & Ma, T. (2020). A spatial econometric empirical research on the impact of industrial agglomeration on haze pollution in China. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(11), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00884-w
  • Zhou, B., Li, Y., Lu, X., Huang, S., & Xue, B. (2019). Effects of officials' cross-regional redeployment on regional environmental quality in China. Environmental Management, 64(6), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01216-0
  • Zhou, K., Zhou, B., & Yu, M. (2020). The impacts of fiscal decentralization on environmental innovation in China. Growth and Change, 51(4), 1690–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12432
  • Zhou, L. (2007). Governing China's local officials: An analysis of promotion tournament model. Economic Research Journal, 7, 36–50. (in Chinese)
  • Zhou, Q. (2009). Government intervention, common agency and the enterprise's pollution emission reduction incentive: Evidence from the provincial panel data of industrial emissions of SO2. Nankai Economic Studies, 4, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.14116/j.nkes.2009.04.001 (in Chinese)