3,116
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of tourism industry, globalization, and technology innovation on ecological footprints in G-10 countries

, , , &
Pages 6688-6704 | Received 15 Jan 2022, Accepted 07 Mar 2022, Published online: 04 Apr 2022

References

  • Adedoyin, F. F., Nwulu, N., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Environmental degradation, energy consumption and sustainable development: accounting for the role of economic complexities with evidence from World Bank income clusters. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2727–2740.
  • Adebayo, T. S., & Acheampong, A. O. (2021). Modelling the globalization-CO2 emission nexus in Australia: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(7), 9867–9882.
  • Adebayo, T. S., & Odugbesan, J. A. (2021). Modeling CO2 emissions in South Africa: empirical evidence from ARDL based bounds and wavelet coherence techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9377–9389.
  • Ahmed, Z., Ali, S., Saud, S., & Shahzad, S. J. H. (2020). Transport CO2 emissions, drivers, and mitigation: an empirical investigation in India. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(11), 1367–1374.
  • Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020). The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation. Resources Policy, 69, 101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817
  • Ahmed, Z., Cary, M., & Le, H. P. (2021a). Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: An aggregated and disaggregated investigation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511
  • Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021b). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
  • Alola, A. A., Eluwole, K. K., Lasisi, T. T., & Alola, U. V. (2021). Perspectives of globalization and tourism as drivers of ecological footprint in top 10 destination economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(24), 31607–31617.
  • An, H., Razzaq, A., Haseeb, M., & Mihardjo, L. W. (2021). The role of technology innovation and people’s connectivity in testing environmental Kuznets curve and pollution heaven hypotheses across the Belt and Road host countries: New evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(5), 5254–5270.
  • Ansari, M. A., Haider, S., & Masood, T. (2021). Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: An analysis of top renewable energy countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(6), 6719–6732.
  • Ansari, M. A., & Villanthenkodath, M. A. (2021). Does tourism development promote ecological footprint? A Nonlinear ARDL Approach. Anatolia, 1–13.
  • Anser, M. K., Apergis, N., Syed, Q. R., & Alola, A. A. (2021). Exploring a new perspective of sustainable development drive through environmental Phillips curve in the case of the BRICST countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 48112–48122.
  • Apaydin, Ş., Ursavaş, U., & Koç, Ü. (2021). The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: Do convergence clubs matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53379–53393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14300-y
  • Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. The Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
  • Caglar, A. E., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Akin, C. S. (2021). Analysing the ecological footprint in EU-5 countries under a scenario of carbon neutrality: Evidence from newly developed sharp and smooth structural breaks in unit root testing. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113155
  • Chen, J., Hu, X., Razi, U., & Rexhepi, G. (2021). The sustainable potential of efficient air-transportation industry and green innovation in realising environmental sustainability in G7 countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 54(5), 1–22.
  • Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818.
  • Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
  • Chunling, L., Memon, J. A., Thanh, T. L., Ali, M., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). The impact of public-private partnership investment in energy and technological innovation on ecological footprint: The case of Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(18), 10085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810085
  • Destek, M. A., & Manga, M. (2021). Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: Evidence from BEM economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(17), 21991–22001.
  • Global Footprint Network. (2017). Country trend (2021). Ecological footprint- carbon footprint. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/
  • Global Footprint Network. (2019). Climate change carbon footprint. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/climate-change/
  • Global Footprint Network. (2020). National footprint accounts, 2019 edition. https://www.data.footprintnetwork.org
  • Godil, D. I., Sharif, A., Rafique, S., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(32), 40109–40120.
  • Godil, D. I., Yu, Z., Sharif, A., Usman, R., & Khan, S. A. R. (2021). Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector CO2 emission in China: A path toward sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 694–707.
  • IMF. (2021). Group of 10, a guide to committees, groups, and clubs. https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/A-Guide-to-Committees-Groups-and-Clubs
  • Katircioglu, S. (2021). Estimating the role of urban development in environment quality: Evidence from G7 countries. Energy & Environment, 0958305X21997980.
  • Katircioglu, S., Gokmenoglu, K. K., & Eren, B. M. (2018). Testing the role of tourism development in ecological footprint quality: Evidence from top 10 tourist destinations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(33), 33611–33619.
  • Ke, H., Dai, S., & Fan, F. (2021). Does innovation efficiency inhibit the ecological footprint? An empirical study of China’s provincial regions. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1959910
  • Keser, A., Çütcü, İ., & Eren, V. M. (2021). Does country-level governance matter for national development? An analysis on the founding states of Turkic council. Applied Economics, 1–14.
  • Khan, I., & Hou, F. (2021). The dynamic links among energy consumption, tourism growth, and the ecological footprint: The role of environmental quality in 38 IEA countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(5), 5049–5062.
  • Khan, Z., Ali, M., Kirikkaleli, D., Wahab, S., & Jiao, Z. (2020). The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1317–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2086
  • Kihombo, S., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., Adebayo, T. S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021a). Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: What is the role of technological innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(43), 61235–61245.
  • Kihombo, S., Vaseer, A. I., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021b). Is there a tradeoff between financial globalization, economic growth, and environmental sustainability? An advanced panel analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 3983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15878-z
  • Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S., Khan, Z., & Ali, S. (2021). Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(11), 14009–14017.
  • Kongbuamai, N., Bui, Q., Yousaf, H. M. A. U., & Liu, Y. (2020). The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: A case study of ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(16), 19251–19264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x
  • Lee, C. C., & Chen, M. P. (2021). Ecological footprint, tourism development, and country risk: International evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123671
  • Liu, D., Xie, Y., Hafeez, M., & Usman, A. (2022). The tradeoff between economic performance and environmental quality: Does financial inclusion matter for emerging Asian economies? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–10.
  • Luo, F., Moyle, B. D., Moyle, C. L. J., Zhong, Y., & Shi, S. (2020). Drivers of carbon emissions in China’s tourism industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(5), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1705315
  • Mushta, A., Chen, Z., Ud Din, N., Ahmad, B., & Zhang, X. (2020). Income inequality, innovation and carbon emission: Perspectives on sustainable growth. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734855
  • Nathaniel, S., Anyanwu, O., & Shah, M. (2020). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 14601–14613.
  • Nathaniel, S. P., Barua, S., & Ahmed, Z. (2021a). What drives ecological footprint in top ten tourist destinations? Evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(28), 38322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13389-5
  • Nathaniel, S. P., Murshed, M., & Bassim, M. (2021b). The nexus between economic growth, energy use, international trade and ecological footprints: The role of environmental regulations in N11 countries. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6(6), 496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00205-y
  • Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2009). On the causality between tourism growth and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 5(25), 73–81.
  • Ozturk, I., Al-Mulali, U., & Saboori, B. (2016). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(2), 1916–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x
  • Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6–10), 1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
  • Razzaq, A., Fatima, T., & Murshed, M. (2021a). Asymmetric effects of tourism development and green innovation on economic growth and carbon emissions in Top 10 GDP Countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1990029
  • Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., Ahmad, P., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2021b). Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy: Fresh insights from QARDL approach. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2139
  • Rehman, A., Radulescu, M., Ma, H., Dagar, V., Hussain, I., & Khan, M. K. (2021). The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: Does environmental sustainability exist? Energies, 14(17), 5234. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175234
  • Sabir, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(32), 33387–33398.
  • Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Environmental performance, biocapacity, carbon & ecological footprint of nations: Drivers, trends and mitigation options. The Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141912.
  • Saud, S., Chen, S., & Haseeb, A. (2020). The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119518.
  • Sharif, A., Afshan, S., Chrea, S., Amel, A., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). The role of tourism, transportation and globalization in testing environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia: New insights from quantile ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(20), 25494–25509.
  • Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(11), 11191–11211.
  • Sharma, J., & Mitra, S. K. (2021). Asymmetric relationship between tourist arrivals and employment. Tourism Economics, 27(5), 952–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816620910000
  • Shen, Y., Su, Z. W., Malik, M. Y., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Khan, M. (2021). Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China. Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538
  • Shokoohi, Z., Dehbidi, N. K., & Tarazkar, M. H. (2022). Energy intensity, economic growth and environmental quality in populous Middle East Countries. Energy, 239, 122164.
  • Shuai, C., Shen, L., Jiao, L., Wu, Y., & Tan, Y. (2017). Identifying key impact factors on carbon emission: Evidences from panel and time-series data of 125 countries from 1990 to 2011. Applied Energy, 187, 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.029
  • Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Alvarado, R. (2020). Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549
  • Song, Y., Zhao, P., Chang, H. L., Razi, U., & Dinca, M. S. (2021). Does the COVID-19 pandemic affect the tourism industry in China? Evidence from extreme quantiles approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18.
  • Sun, Y., Kamran, H. W., Razzaq, A., Qadri, F. S., Economist, R., & Suksatan, W. (2022). Dynamic and causality linkages from transportation services and tourism development to economic growth and carbon emissions: New insights from Quantile ARDL approach. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4570
  • Tahir, Z. I., & Rafiq, G. A. (2021). Sustainable development of the tourism industry in Azerbaijan. Universidad y Sociedad, 13(1), 43–50.
  • Tang, R. (2021). Trade facilitation promoted the inbound tourism efficiency in Japan. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100805
  • Tao, R., Umar, M., Naseer, A., & Razi, U. (2021). The dynamic effect of eco-innovation and environmental taxes on carbon neutrality target in emerging seven (E7) economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113525.
  • Udemba, E. N., & Keleş, N. İ. (2021). Interactions among urbanization, industrialization and foreign direct investment (FDI) in determining the environment and sustainable development: New insight from Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 6(1), 191–212.
  • Ulucak, R. (2020). How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136504.
  • Usman, M., & Makhdum, M. S. A. (2021). What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renewable Energy, 179, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.014
  • Wang, Y. L., Zhao, C., Guan, X. Y., & Yaqoob, T. (2021). Strengthening climate prevention through economic globalization, clean energy, and financial development in N11 countries: Evidence from advance panel estimations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–23.
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
  • Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecological Economics Research Trends, 1, 1–11.
  • Worldometer. (2017). GDP by country 2017. https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/gdp-by-country/
  • Xuefeng, Z., Razzaq, A., Gokmenoglu, K. K., & Rehman, F. U. (2021). Time varying interdependency between COVID-19, tourism market, oil prices, and sustainable climate in United States: Evidence from advance wavelet coherence approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1992642
  • Yang, B., Jahanger, A., & Ali, M. (2021a). Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: Do technological innovation and financial development matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(18), 23482–23500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3
  • Yang, B., Usman, M., & Jahanger, A. (2021b). Do industrialization, economic growth and globalization processes influence the ecological footprint and healthcare expenditures? Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for countries with the highest healthcare expenditures. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.020
  • Yang, X., Li, N., Mu, H., Zhang, M., Pang, J., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Study on the long-term and short-term effects of globalization and population aging on ecological footprint in OECD countries. Ecological Complexity, 47, 100946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100946
  • Zaidi, S. A. H., Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., & Hou, F. (2019). Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: Evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210
  • Zhang, S., & Liu, X. (2019). The roles of international tourism and renewable energy in environment: New evidence from Asian countries. Renewable Energy, 139, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.046
  • Zhuang, Y., Yang, S., Razzaq, A., & Khan, Z. (2021). Environmental impact of infrastructure-led Chinese outward FDI, tourism development and technology innovation: A regional country analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1989672