1,103
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The moderating role of technological innovation and renewable energy on CO2 emission in O.E.C.D. countries: evidence from panel quantile regression approach

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2168720 | Received 29 Sep 2022, Accepted 10 Jan 2023, Published online: 22 May 2023

References

  • Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Bai, Y., Qiao, G., Popp, J., & Oláh, J. (2022). Financial inclusion, technological innovations, and environmental quality: Analyzing the role of green openness. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENVS.2022.851263/BIBTEX
  • Alam, M. S., Atif, M., Chien-Chi, C., & Soytaş, U. (2019). Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries. Energy Economics, 78, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.031
  • Ali, H. S., Law, S. H., Lin, W. L., Yusop, Z., Chin, L., & Bare, U. A. A. (2019). Financial development and carbon dioxide emissions in Nigeria: Evidence from the ARDL bounds approach. GeoJournal, 84(3), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9880-5
  • Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2016). The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: The role of energy prices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1622–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.131
  • Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
  • Álvarez-Herránz, A., Balsalobre, D., Cantos, J. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: Fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy, 101, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
  • Atici, C. (2009). Carbon emissions in Central and Eastern Europe: Environmental Kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 17(3), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.372
  • Banerjee, A. (1999). Panel data unit roots and cointegration: An overview. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1607
  • Chen, J., Cheng, S., & Song, M. (2018). Changes in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions of the agricultural sector in China from 2005 to 2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.050
  • Cheng, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z., & Shi, Y. (2018). The impacts of non-fossil energy, economic growth, energy consumption, and oil price on carbon intensity: Evidence from a panel quantile regression analysis of EU 28. Sustainability, 10(11), 4067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114067
  • Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
  • Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K., & Smyth, R. (2018). The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 75, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.09.004
  • Dong, K., Hochman, G., & Timilsina, G. R. (2020). Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development? Energy Policy, 140, 111420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111420
  • Du, K., Li, P., & Yan, Z. (2019). Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.010
  • Erdoğan, S., Çakar, N. D., Ulucak, R., Kassouri, Y., & Danish. (2021). The role of natural resources abundance and dependence in achieving environmental sustainability: Evidence from resource‐based economies. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2137
  • Fernández Fernández, Y., Fernández López, M. A., & Olmedillas Blanco, B. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459–3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
  • Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd.
  • Galvao, A. F., Montes-Rojas, G., Sosa-Escudero, W., & Wang, L. (2013). Tests for skewness and kurtosis in the one-way error component model. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 122, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2013.07.002
  • Ganda, F. (2019). The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235
  • Goulder, L. H., & Mathai, K. (2000). Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1089
  • Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K. M., & Lu, Z. (2018). Energy consumption and economic growth: New evidence from the OECD countries. Energy, 153, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.158
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement [Working paper No. 3914]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.325
  • Hille, E., & Lambernd, B. (2020). The role of innovation in reducing South Korea’s energy intensity: Regional-data evidence on various energy carriers. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110293
  • Hodson, E. L., Brown, M., Cohen, S., Showalter, S., Wise, M., Wood, F., Caron, J., Feijoo, F., Iyer, G., & Cleary, K. (2018). U.S. energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO2 policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study. Energy Economics, 73, 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.027
  • Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., & Yang, X. (2022). Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882
  • Jin, C., Razzaq, A., Saleem, F., & Sinha, A. (2022). Asymmetric effects of eco-innovation and human capital development in realizing environmental sustainability in China: Evidence from quantile ARDL framework. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 4947–4970. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2019598
  • Kaygusuz, K., Yüksek, Ö., & Sari, A. (2007). Renewable energy sources in the European Union: Markets and capacity. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 2(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240500400887
  • Koçak, E., Ulucak, R., Dedeoğlu, M., & Ulucak, Z. Ş. (2019). Is there a trade-off between sustainable society targets in Sub-Saharan Africa? Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101705
  • Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
  • Lantz, V., & Feng, Q. (2006). Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: Where’s the EKC? Ecological Economics, 57(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.006
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
  • Li, H., Jiang, H.-D., Dong, K.-Y., Wei, Y.-M., & Liao, H. (2020). A comparative analysis of the life cycle environmental emissions from wind and coal power: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119192
  • Li, Q., Sharif, A., Razzaq, A., & Yu, Y. (2022). Do climate technology, financialization, and sustainable finance impede environmental challenges? Evidence from G10 economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122095
  • Lindman, Å., & Söderholm, P. (2016). Wind energy and green economy in Europe: Measuring policy-induced innovation using patent data. Applied Energy, 179, 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.128
  • Liu, Y., Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 108, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.055
  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
  • Markewitz, P., Kuckshinrichs, W., Leitner, W., Linssen, J., Zapp, P., Bongartz, R., Schreiber, A., & Müller, T. E. (2012). Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy & Environmental Science, 5(6), 7281–7305. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee03403d
  • Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental science and Pollution Research International, 25(29), 29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
  • Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Dauda, L., Boamah, K. B., Salman, M., Appiah-Twum, F., & Tachie, A. K. (2019). Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118204
  • Munir, Q., Lean, H. H., & Smyth, R. (2020). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: A cross-sectional dependence approach. Energy Economics, 85, 104571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104571
  • OECD. (2020). Patents on environment technologies (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/cc8a7b7a-en
  • Ozcan, B. (2013). The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 62, 1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.016
  • Özokcu, S., & Özdemir, Ö. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059
  • Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
  • Peng, G., Meng, F., Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., & Kurbonov, K. (2022). Economic growth, technology, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: Investigating the non-linear impacts of economic complexity. Environmental science and Pollution Research International, 29(45), 68051–68062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20647-7
  • Petrović, P., & Lobanov, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sixteen OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119187
  • Powell, D. (2022). Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Empirical Economics, 63(5), 2675–2691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02216-6
  • Rauf, A., Liu, X., Amin, W., Ozturk, I., Rehman, O. U., & Hafeez, M. (2018). Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: A fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies. Environmental science and Pollution Research International, 25(32), 32066–32080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5
  • Requate, T., & Unold, W. (2003). Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology: Will the true ranking please stand up? European Economic Review, 47(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00188-5
  • Saqib, N. (2018). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Empirical evidence from gulf cooperation council countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.32479/IJEEP.7269
  • Saqib, N. (2022a). Green energy, non-renewable energy, financial development and economic growth with carbon footprint: Heterogeneous panel evidence from cross-country. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 6945–6964. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2054454
  • Saqib, N. (2022b). Nexus between the renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption and carbon footprints: Evidence from Asian emerging economies. Environmental science and Pollution Research International, 29(38), 58326–58340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19948-8
  • Saqib, N. (2022c). Asymmetric linkages between renewable energy, technological innovation, and carbon-dioxide emission in developed economies: Non-linear ARDL analysis. Environmental science and Pollution Research International, 29(40), 60744–60758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20206-0
  • Saqib, N., Duran, I. A., & Sharif, I. (2022). Influence of energy structure, environmental regulations and human capital on ecological sustainability in EKC framework; evidence from MINT countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.968405
  • Saqib, N., Sharif, A., Razzaq, A., & Usman, M. (2022). Integration of renewable energy and technological innovation in realizing environmental sustainability: The role of human capital in EKC framework. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23345-6
  • Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. The Science of the Total Environment, 646, 862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
  • Shahbaz, M., Raghutla, C., Song, M., Zameer, H., & Jiao, Z. (2020). Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: The role of technological innovations in China. Energy Economics, 86, 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104664
  • Sharif, A., Saqib, N., Dong, K., & Khan, S. A. R. (2022). Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1934–1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2360
  • Socolow, R., Hotinski, R., Greenblatt, J. B., & Pacala, S. (2004). Solving the climate problem: Technologies available to curb CO2 emissions. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 46(10), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139150409605818
  • Song, M., Fisher, R., & Kwoh, Y. (2019). Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.055
  • Su, H.-N., & Moaniba, I. M. (2017). Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.017
  • Tang, T., Shahzad, F., Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., & Abbas, S. (2022). Energy transition for meeting ecological goals: Do economic stability, technology, and government stability matter? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955494
  • Ulucak, R., Koçak, E., Erdoğan, S., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). Investigating the non-linear effects of globalization on material consumption in the EU countries: Evidence from PSTR estimation. Resources Policy, 67, 101667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101667
  • Ulucak, R., Yücel, A. G., & Koçak, E. (2019). The process of sustainability: from past to present. In Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) (pp. 37–53). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816797-7.00005-9
  • UNFCCC. (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. INDC submission. http://unfccc.int/focus/indc_portal/items/8766.php
  • Usman, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? Energy Policy, 162, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112780
  • Wang, J., Dong, X., Qiao, H., & Dong, K. (2020). Impact assessment of agriculture, energy and water on CO2 emissions in China: Untangling the differences between major and non-major grain-producing areas. Applied Economics, 52(60), 6482–6497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1796920
  • Wang, S., Zeng, J., & Liu, X. (2019). Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: A panel quantile regression approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.046
  • Wang, X., & Lin, B. (2016). How to reduce CO2 emissions in China's iron and steel industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1496–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.131
  • Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Yin, J. (2012). Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 42, 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.082
  • Wurlod, J. D., & Noailly, J. (2018). The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries. Energy Economics, 71, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.012
  • Yang, Q., Huo, J., Saqib, N., & Mahmood, H. (2022). Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 192, 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.123
  • Yin, J., Zheng, M., & Chen, J. (2015). The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China. Energy Policy, 77, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.008
  • Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Saqib, N., & Waqas Kamran, H. (2022). An empirical study on the impact of energy poverty on carbon intensity of the construction industry: Moderating role of technological innovation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.929939
  • Zhang, N., Wang, B., & Liu, Z. (2016). Carbon emissions dynamics, efficiency gains, and technological innovation in China’s industrial sectors. Energy, 99, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.012
  • Zhao, X., Zhang, X., & Shao, S. (2016). Decoupling CO2 emissions and industrial growth in China over 1993–2013: The role of investment. Energy Economics, 60, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.10.008