Conifer plantations in grassland and subtropical forest: Does spider diversity respond different to edge effect?

References

• Allen AP, O’Connor RJ. 2000. Interactive effects of land use and other factors on regional bird distributions. J Biogeogr. 27:889–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón G, Abuja L, Belinchón R, Martínez I. 2015. Edge type determines the intensity of forest edge effect on epiphytic communities. European J of for Res. 134:443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin I, Messier C, Bouchard A. 2008. Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests? Biol Conserv. 141:2461–2476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow J, Gardner TA, Ferreira LV, Peres CA. 2007. Litter fall and decomposition in primary, secondary and plantation forests in the Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manage. 247:91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes AD, Emberson RM, Chapman HM, Krell FT, Didham RK. 2014. Matrix habitat restoration alters dung beetle species responses across tropical forest edges. Biol Conserv. 170:28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford SE, Usher MB. 1994. Distribution of arthropod species across the margins of farm woodlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 48:295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JR, Wheater CP, Cullen WR. 2001. The implications of grassland and heathland management for the conservation of spider communities: a review. J of Zool. 255:377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltramo J, Bertolaccini I, González A. 2006. Spiders of soybean crops in Santa Fe province, Argentina: influence of surrounding spontaneous vegetation on lot colonization. Brazilian J Biol. 66:891–898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bieringer G, Zulka KP. 2003. Shading out species richness: edge effect of a pine plantation on the Orthoptera (Tettigoniidae and Acrididae) assemblage of an adjacent dry grassland. Biodivers Conserv. 12:1481–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop L, Riechert SE. 1990. Spider colonization of agroecosystems: mode and source. Environ Entomol. 19:1738–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundztige Der Vegetationskunde. 3, 865 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J. 2008. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiv Conserv. 17:925–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbelli JM, Zurita GA, Filloy J, Galvis JP, Vespa NI, Bellocq I. 2015. Integrating taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic beta diversities: interactive effects with the biome and land use across taxa. PloS One. 10:e0126854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mas E, Chust G, Pretus JL, Ribera C. 2009. Spatial modelling of spider biodiversity: matters of scale. Biodivers Conserv. 18:1945–1962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean DA, Sterling WL. 1985. Size and phenology of ballooning spiders at two locations in eastern Texas. J Arachnol. 13: 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie I, Coulson J, Butterfield J. 1996. Distribution and dynamics of surface dwelling spiders across a pasture-plantation ecotone. Ecography. 19:29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duelli P, Obrist MK, Schmatz DR. 1999. Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: above-ground insects. Agric Ecosys Environ. 74:33–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran SM, Kattan GH. 2005. A test of the utility of exotic tree plantations for understory birds and food resources in the Colombian Andes. Biotropica. 37:129–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filloy J, Zurita GA, Corbelli JM, Bellocq MI. 2010. On the similarity among bird communities: testing the influence of distance and land use. Acta Oecologica. 36:333–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 16:265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallé R, Fehér B. 2006. Edge effect on spider assemblages. Tiscia. 35:37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Esseen PA. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol. 19:768–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowal VA, Cartar RV. 2012. Edge effects of three anthropogenic disturbances on spider communities in Alberta’s boreal forest. J Insect Conserv. 16:613–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrivée M, Drapeau P, Fahrig L. 2008. Edge effects created by wildfire and clear-cutting on boreal forest ground-dwelling spiders. For Ecol Manage. 255:1434–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAGyP (Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca) and SAyDS (Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable). 2015. Segundo Reporte de Argentina al Proceso de Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Malmivaara-Lämsä M, Hamberg L, Haapamäki E, Liski J, Kotze DJ, Lehvävirta S, Fritze H. 2008. Edge effects and trampling in boreal urban forest fragments – impacts on the soil microbial community. Soil Biol Biochem. 40:1612–1621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos JA, Marcos E, Taboada A, Tarrega R. 2007. Comparison of community structure and soil characteristics in different aged Pinus sylvestris plantations and a natural pine forest. For Ecol Manage. 247:35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TJ, Major RE. 2001. Changes in wolf spider (Araneae) assemblages across woodland–pasture boundaries in the central wheat-belt of New South Wales, Australia. Austral Ecol. 26:264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matteucci S, Rodriguez A, Silva M 2012. Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos. Buenos Aires, Orientación Gráfica Editora 309–348.
   Google Scholar
• Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 10:58–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyffeler M, Birkhofer K. 2017. An estimated 400–800 million tons of prey are annually killed by the global spider community. The Science of Nature. 104(3–4):30.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL. 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in south-eastern Brazil, and the influence of climate. Biotropica. 32:793–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxbrough AG, Gittings T, O’Halloran J, Giller PS, Smith GF. 2005. Structural indicators of spider communities across the forest plantation cycle. For Ecol Manage. 212:171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JL, Venier LA. 2006. The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae)as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: a review. Ecolindic, 6: 780–793.
   Google Scholar
• Petcharad B, Miyashita T, Gale GA, Sotthibandhu S, Bumrungsri S. 2016. Spatial patterns and environmental determinants of community composition of web-building spiders in understory across edges between rubber plantations and forests. J Arachnol. 44:182–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyras M, Vespa NI, Bellocq MI, Zurita GA. 2013. Quantifying edge effects: the role of habitat contrast and species specialization. J Insect Conserv. 17:807–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto-Benítez S, Méndez M. 2011. Effects of land management on the abundance and richness of spiders (Araneae): A meta-analysis. Biol Conserv. 144:683–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ries L, Fletcher RJ Jr, Battin J, Sisk TD. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:491–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MR. 2002. Effects of forest plantation management on herbaceous-layer composition and diversity. Can J of Bot. 80:378–389.
   Google Scholar
• Servicio meteorológico nacional, Argentina. 2006. http://www.smn.gov.ar.
   Google Scholar
• Soga M, Kanno N, Yamaura Y, Koike S. 2013. Patch size determines the strength of edge effects on carabid beetle assemblages in urban remnant forests. J Insect Conserv. 17:421–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland K, Samu F. 2000. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Entomol Exp Appl. 95:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespa NI, Zurita G, Bellocq MI. 2014. Functional responses to edge effects: seed dispersal in the southern Atlantic forest, Argentina. For Ecol Manage. 328:310–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimp GM, Murphy SM, Lewis D, Ries L. 2011. Do edge responses cascade up or down a multi‐trophic food web? Ecol Lett. 14:863–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise DH. 1993. Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamazaki L, Vindica VF, Brescovit AD, Marques MI, Battirola LD. 2017. Temporal variation in the spider assemblage (Arachnida, Araneae) in canopies of Callisthene fasciculata (Vochysiaceae) in the Brazilian Pantanal biome. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 107: e2017019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita GA, Bellocq MI. 2010. Spatial patterns of bird community similarity: bird responses to landscape composition and configuration in the Atlantic forest. Landsc Ecol. 25:147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York (NY): Spring Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar