Needs assessment of forestry education in Laos: the case of Souphanouvong University

References

• Arevalo J, Pitkänen S, Kirongo B. 2014. Developing forestry curricula: experiences from a Kenyan-Finnish project. Int For Rev. 16(1):78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL. 2008. Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 33:187–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird IG. 2014. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and access and exclusion: obstacles and opportunities in Cambodia and Laos. Southeast Asian Stud. 3(3):643–668.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg DC, Tappe PA. 2015. The many values of field-based education in forestry. J For. 113(6):592–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TL, Lassoie JP. 1998. Entry-level competency and skill requirements of foresters: what do employers want? J For. 96(2):8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckman VJ, Haruthaithanasan M, Miller RO, Terada T, Brenner AK, Kraxner F, Flaspohler D. 2018. Sustainable forest bioenergy development strategies in Indochina: collaborative effort to establish regional policies. Forests. 9(4):223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley J, Plenderleith K, Howe R, Freer‐Smith P. 2005. Forest education and research in the United Kingdom. For Sci Technol. 1(2):67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Capoor K, Ambrosi P. 2008. State and trends of the carbon market 2008. Washington, D.C. (United States): World Bank. [accessed 2018 Oct 16]. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/NEWS/Resources/State&Trendsformatted06May10pm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. 2018. The world factbook. [accessed 2018 Oct 16]. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bg.html
   Google Scholar
• Chuvieco E, Salas J. 1996. Mapping the spatial distribution of forest fire danger using GIS. Int J Geog Inf Sci. 10(3):333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies K, Rajvanshi A, Youn Y. 2018. Nature’s contributions to people and quality of life. In: Karki M, Sellamuttu SS, Okayasu S, Suzuki W. The regional assessment report on biodiversiy and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.Bonn, p. 67-173. [cited 2019 May 28]. https://www.ipbes.net/system/tdf/2018_asia_pacific_full_report_book_v3_pages.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=29507
   Google Scholar
• Department of Forestry. 2011. Annual review of REDD+ activities in Lao PDR. Vientiane, (Laos):Department of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond RM. 1998. Designing and assessing courses and curricula: a practical guide. San Francisco (USA): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer C, Wingfield MJ. 2005. Challenges and strategies facing forest research and education for the 21st century: a case study from South Africa. For Sci Technol. 1(2):135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Foppes J, Ketphanh S. 1997. The use of non-timber forest products in Lao PDR. In Workshop on Sustainable Management of Non-Wood Forest Products; Malaysia. p. 3–8. [accessed 2018 Oct 16]. http://lad.nafri.org.la/fulltext/LAD010320040107.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fujita Y, Phanvilay K. 2008. Land and forest allocation in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: comparison of case studies from community-based natural resource management research. Soc Nat Resour. 21(2):120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA. 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett. 2(4):045023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilless JK. 2015. The Berkeley summit—looking to the future for forestry education. J For. 113(6):587–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon JC. 2006. Forestry education and research in the United States: a story of shifting paradigms. For Sci Technol. 2(2):111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Guldin RW, Brown P. 2005. Forest education and research in the United States of America. For Sci Technol. 1(2):120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsfield A, Ostermeier D. 2003. Certification: the view from FSC-certified land managers. J For. 101(8):32–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold M, Skutsch M.2009.Measurement, reporting and verification for REDD+: objectives, capacities and institutions. In: Angelsen A,editor.Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options.Bogor (Indonesia): CIFOR; p.85–100. ISBN 978-6-02-869303-5. [accessed 2018 Oct 18]. https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BAngelsen0902.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoeflich VA. 2005. Forest research and education system in Brazil: a preliminary overview. For Sci Technol. 1(2):168–175.
   Google Scholar
• Ian GB. 2014. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and access and exclusion: Obstacles and opportunities in Cambodia and Laos. Southeast Asian Studies. 3(3):643–668.
   Google Scholar
• Innes JL. 2005. Challenges facing forest educators in North America. For Sci Technol. 1(2):127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kanowski PJ. 2015. Internationalizing forestry education. J For. 113(6):574–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SB, Alounsavath O. 2015. Forest policy measures influence on the increase of forest cover in northern Laos. For Sci Technol. 11(3):166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Koch S. 2017. The struggle over Lao PDR’s forests: new opportunities for improved forest governance? Pac Geogr. 47(January/February):4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Köhl M, Magnussen SS, Marchetti M. 2006. Sampling methods, remote sensing and GIS multiresource forest inventory. Berlin and Heidelberg (Germany): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kostilainena A. 2005. A perspective of the students of higher forestry education. For Sci Technol. 1(2):224–227.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca LR, Stark JS. 2009. Shaping the college curriculum: academic plans in context. 2nd ed. San Francisco (USA): Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
   Google Scholar
• Lestrelin G, Trockenbrodt M, Phanvilay K, Thongmanivong S, Vongvisouk T, Thuy PT, Castella JC. 2013. The context of REDD+ in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: drivers, agents and institutions. Vol. 92. Bogor: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RW, Hauer RJ, Werner LP. 2015. Urban forestry: planning and managing urban greenspaces. Long Grove (USA): Waveland press.
   Google Scholar
• Nair CTS 2004. What does the future hold for forestry education? Unansylva 216, reinventing forestry. [accessed 2018 Oct 16]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5382e/y5382e02.htm
   Google Scholar
• Paule L, Scheer LU. 2005. Forestry education in Slovakia. For Sci Technol. 1(2):150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Pelkonen P. 2005. Challenges and strategies for forest education and research in Finland. For Sci Technol. 1(2):104–114.
   Google Scholar
• Phompila C, Lewis M, Ostendorf B, Clarke K. 2017. Forest cover changes in Lao tropical forests: physical and socio-economic factors are the most important drivers. Land. 6(2):23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prüller R. 2005. Challenges and strategies in forest education and research in Austria with special focus on the role of terminology worldwide. For Sci Technol. 1(2):91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Razak MAA, Norini H, Krishnapillay B. 2005. Forestry research and education in Malaysia. For Sci Technol. 1(2):176–184.
   Google Scholar
• Rebugio LL, Camacho LD. 2005. Reorienting forestry education to sustainable forest management: the case of the University of the Philippines Los Banos College of forestry and natural resources. For Sci Technol. 1(2):193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Reid WV, Mooney HA, Cropper A, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Dasgupta P, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Hassan R, et al. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC (USA): World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg JD. 2006. Forests, marketization, livelihoods and the poor in the Lao PDR. Land Degrad Dev. 17(2):123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample VA, Bixler RP, McDonough MH, Bullard SH, Snieckus MM. 2015. The promise and performance of forestry education in the United States: results of a survey of forestry employers, graduates, and educators. J For. 113(6):528–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample VA, Ringgold PC, Block NE, Giltmier JW. 1999. Forestry education: adapting to the changing demands on professionals. J For. 97(9):4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki S. 2006. Forestry education and research in Japan. For Sci Technol. 2(2):123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Savannakhet University. 2015. Official homepage of Savanakhet University. [accessed 2018 Oct 16]. http://skulao.org/pages/html/aboutus.html
   Google Scholar
• Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Monforti-Ferrario F, Nita V. 2015. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts. Environ Dev. 15:3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JH, Kim EG, Lee DK. 2005. Forest research and education in the republic of Korea. For Sci Technol. 1(2):211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Shougong Z. 2005. Challenges and strategies of forest research and education in China. For Sci Technol. 1(2):203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Souphanouvong University. 2015. Guideline of administration and academic management. Luang Prabang (Laos):Souphanouvong University.
   Google Scholar
• Teplyakov VK. 2005. Current state and challenges in forestry education in Russia. For Sci Technol. 1(2):142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Thongmanivong S, Fujita Y. 2006. Recent land use and livelihood transitions in northern Laos. Mt Res Dev. 26(3):237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong PS 2009. Lao People’s Democratic Republic forestry outlook study. Asia-Pacific forestry sector outlook study II. Working Paper No. APFSOS II/WP/2009/17. [accessed 2018 Oct 16]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/am612e/am612e00.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Kooten GC, Nelson HW, Vertinsky I. 2005. Certification of sustainable forest management practices: a global perspective on why countries certify. For Policy Econ. 7(6):857–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lierop P. 2003. The changing world of forest education: global trends. In XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec City, Canada, p. 21-28
   Google Scholar
• Vancura K. 2005. Challenging issues and future strategies of forest research and education in central and eastern European countries. For Sci Technol. 1(2):156–167.
   Google Scholar
• von Gadow K. 2005. Forest research and education in Germany. For Sci Technol. 1(2):77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wanneng P. 2013. Transitions to sustainable forest management and rehabilitation in Laos. Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia): APAFRI.
   Google Scholar