Challenges of the Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) program in forest conservation: a case study in Central Vietnam

References

• Calvet-Mir L, Corbera E, Martin A, Fisher J, Gross-Camp N. 2015. Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: a closer look at effectiveness and equity. Curr Opinion Environ Sustain. 14:150–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera E, Brown K, Adger NW. 2007. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Dev Change. 38(4):587–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera E, Soberanis CG, Brown K. 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecol Econ. 68(3):743–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong W, Dinh D, Trieu S, Hung V. 2006. Forest rehabilitation in Vietnam lessons from the past. Bogor (Indonesia): CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Duong NTB, de Groot WT. 2018. Distributional risk in PES: exploring the concept in the payment for environmental forest services program, Vietnam. For Policy Econ. 92:22–32. [Internet]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong NTB, De Groot WT. 2020. The impact of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) on community-level forest management in Vietnam. For Policy Econ. 113(5):102135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102135.
   Google Scholar
• Haas JC, Loft L, Pham TT. 2019. How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam’s payments for forest environmental services program. Ecol Econ. 160(2):205–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.021.
   Google Scholar
• Hoan T. 2014. Forest resources and forestry in Vietnam. J Vietnamese Environ. 6(2):171–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.13141/jve.vol6.no2.pp171-177.
   Google Scholar
• Le N, Loft L, Tjajadi J, Pham T, Wong G. 2016. Being equitable is not always fair: an assessment of PFES implementation in Dien Bien, Vietnam. Bogor (Indonesia).
   Google Scholar
• Loft L, Gehrig S, Le DN, Rommel J. 2019. Effectiveness and equity of payments for ecosystem services: real-effort experiments with Vietnamese land users. Land Use Policy. 86(5):218–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Loft L, Le DN, Pham TT, Yang AL, Tjajadi JS, Wong GY. 2017. Whose equity matters? National to local equity perceptions in Vietnam’s payments for forest ecosystem services scheme. Ecol Econ. 135:164–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A, Gross-Camp N, Kebede B, McGuire S, Munyarukaza J. 2014. Whose environmental justice? Exploring local and global perspectives in a payments for ecosystem services scheme in Rwanda. Geoforum. 54:167–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee P, Nghiem T, Le H, Vu H, Tran N. 2014. Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. J Rural Stud. 36:423–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee PD. 2012. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: panacea or problem? Geoforum. 43(3):412–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian R, Corbera E, Pascual U, Kosoy N, May PH. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1202–1208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Phelps J, Garmendia E, Brown K, Corbera E, Martin A, Gomez-Baggethun E, Muradian R. 2014. Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. Bioscience. 64(11):1027–1036. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham T, Bennett K, Vu T, Brunner J, Le N, Nguyen D. 2013. Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam : from policy to practice. Bogor (Indonesia): Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
   Google Scholar
• Pham T, Dao TL, Hoang T, Bui TM, Pham H, Nguyen V. 2018. Opportunities and challenges in mobilizing finance to implement Vietnam’s forestry development strategy for 2006-2020. Bogor (Indonesia):  Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
   Google Scholar
• Pham T, Loft L, Bennett K, Phuong VT, Dung LN, Brunner J. 2015. Monitoring and evaluation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam: from myth to reality. Ecosyst Serv. 16:220–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham TT, Moeliono M, Brockhaus M, Le DN, Wong GY, Le TM. 2014. Local preferences and strategies for effective, efficient, and equitable distribution of PES revenues in Vietnam: lessons for REDD+. Hum Ecol. 42(6):885–899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9703-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham V. 2015. Lessons and experiences from implementation of PFES in Viet Nam. In: Inle Lake: the ASFN 6th Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Phan TH, Brouwer R, Hoang L, Davidson MD. 2018. Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam’s PES program. PLoS One. 13(8):1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomers S, Matzdorf B. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosyst Serv. 6:16–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhardiman D, Wichelns D, Lestrelin G, Thai Hoanh C. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services in Vietnam: market-based incentives or state control of resources? Ecosyst Serv. 5:94–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacconi L, Mahanty S, Suich H. 2009. Assessing the livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services: implications for avoided deforestation. XIII World Congr Buenos: ANU Research Publications;1–7.
   Google Scholar
• To P, Dressler W. 2019. Rethinking ‘success’: the politics of payment for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam. Land Use Policy. 81(11):582–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.010.
   Google Scholar
• To PX, Dressler WH, Mahanty S, Pham TT, Zingerli C. 2012. The Prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: a Look at three payment schemes. Hum Ecol. 40(2):237–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9480-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trædal LT, Vedeld PO, Pétursson JG. 2016. Analyzing the transformations of forest PES in Vietnam: implications for REDD+. For Policy Econ. 62:109–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran TT, Zeller M, Suhardiman D. 2016. Payments for ecosystem services in Hoa Binh province, Vietnam: an institutional analysis. Ecosyst Serv. 22(1):83–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Thua Thien Hue Forest Protection Department 2019. Thua Thien Hue Province
   Google Scholar
• Ubukata F, Truong QH. 2019. Local struggles for the coproduction of natural capital. In: Devlin JF (Ed.), Soc Movements Contesting Nat Resour Dev. London: Taylor & Francis; p. 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder S. 2008. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environ Dev Econ. 13(3):279–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar