Environmental themes and ecosystem services in picture books about forests for sustainability education

References

• Ahi B, Balcı S. 2018. Ecology and the child: determination of the knowledge level of children aged four to five about concepts of forest and deforestation. Int Res Geog Environ Educ. 27(3):234–249. DOI:10.1080/10382046.2017.1349372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaya-Romero M, Muñoz-Rojas M, Ibáñez B, Marañón T. 2016. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Mediterranean areas. A regional case study in South Spain. Ecosyst Serv. 20:82–90. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton KM, Barrie E, Samuel TJ. 2019. Modelling positive consequences: increased vegetable intakes following modelled enjoyment versus modelled intake. Appetite. 140:76–81. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avraamidou L, Osborne J. 2009. The role of narrative in communicating science. Int J Sci Educ. 31(12):1683–1707. DOI:10.1080/09500690802380695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babb YM, McBurnie J, Miller KK. 2018. Tracking the environment in Australian children’s literature: the children’s book council of Australia picture book of the year awards 1955-2014. Environ Educ Res. 24(5):716–730. DOI:10.1080/13504622.2017.1326020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 1986. Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Ann Rev Psychol. 52(1):1–26. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt R, Barratt-Hacking E, Black P. 2014. Innovative approaches to early childhood education for sustainability in England. In: Davis, J., Elliott, S. Research in early childhood education for sustainability: international perspectives and provocations. London: Routledge; p. 225–247.
   Google Scholar
• Baur JW, Tynon JF, Ries P, Rosenberger RS. 2016. Public attitudes about urban forest ecosystem services management: a case study in Oregon cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 17:42–53. DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet-Cohen N, Reilly RC. 2013. Teachers’ perspectives on environmental education in multicultural contexts: towards culturally-responsive environmental education. Teach and Teach Educ. 36:12–22. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerema A, Rebelo AJ, Bodi MB, Esler KJ, Meire P. 2017. Are ecosystem services adequately quantified? J Appl Ecol. 54(2):358–370. DOI:10.1111/1365-2664.12696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg F, Winberg TM, Vinterek M. 2019. Preschool children’s knowledge about the environmental impact of various modes of transport. Early Child Dev Care. 189(3):376–391. DOI:10.1080/03004430.2017.1324433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbery D. 2013. Bridges to global citizenship: ecologically sustainable futures utilising children’s literature in teacher education. Aust J Environ Educ. 29(2):221–237. DOI:10.1017/aee.2014.7.
   Google Scholar
• Briner S, Huber R, Bebi P, Elkin C, Schmatz DR, Grêt-Regamey A. 2013. Trade-offs between ecosystem services in a mountain region. Ecol Soc. 18(3):35. DOI:10.5751/ES-05576-180335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla L, Rivkin M . 2014 Early childhood education for sustainability in the United States of America Davis, J., Elliott, S. Research in early childhood education for sustainability: international perspectives and provocations. Research in early childhood education for sustainability. London: Routledge; p. 264–281.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton S, Myers G. 2010. Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. Environ Conserv C Found Environ Conserv. 37(2):222–225. DOI:10.1017/S0376892910000457.
   Google Scholar
• Davis JM. 2015. Young children and the environment: early education for sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ. 41(3):393–408. DOI:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KM, Baste IA, Brauman KA. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science. 359(6373):270–272. DOI:10.1126/science.aap8826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djuwita R, Benyamin A. 2019. Teaching pro-environmental behavior: a challenge in Indonesian schools. Psychol Res Urban Soc. 2(1):26–35. DOI:10.7454/proust.v2i1.48.
   Google Scholar
• Duerden MD, Witt PA. 2010. The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J Environ Psychol. 30(4):379–392. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE, Jones RE. 2002. Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. Handb Environ Sociol. 3(6):482–524.
   Google Scholar
• Ebersbach M, Brandenburger I. 2020. Reading a short story changes children’s sustainable behavior in a resource dilemma. J Exp Child Psychol. 191:104743. DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert A, Place G, Sibthorp J. 2005. Early-life outdoor experiences and an individual’s environmental attitudes. Leisure Sci. 27(3):225–239. DOI:10.1080/01490400590930853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2018. Terms and definitions FRA 2020. In: Pekkarinen DPBA, editor. Forest resources assessment working papers. Rome (Italy): FAO. p. 4
   Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68(3):643–653. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountas IC, Pinnell GS. 2012. Guided reading: the romance and the reality. Read Teach. 66(4):268–284. DOI:10.1002/TRTR.01123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn ER, Garrett MK. 2017. Preschoolers’ moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking. J Environ Psychol. 53:11–19. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassinger-Das B, Jordan NC, Dyson N. 2015. Reading stories to learn math: mathematics vocabulary instruction for children with early numeracy difficulties. Elem Sch J. 116(2):242–264. DOI:10.1086/683986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao C-Y, Shih P-Y. 2015. The impact of using picture books with preschool students in Taiwan on the teaching of environmental concepts. Int Educ Stud. 8(3):14–23. DOI:10.5539/ies.v8n3p14.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue M, O’Gorman L, Davis J. 2016. Investigating early childhood teachers’ understandings of and practices in education for sustainability in Queensland: a Japan-Australia research collaboration. Aust J Environ Educ. 32(2):174–191. DOI:10.1017/aee.2016.4.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson H, Mathis J, Short KG. 2016. Critical content analysis of children’s and young adult literature: reframing perspective. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Justice LM, Meier J, Walpole S. 2005. Learning new words from storybooks: an efficacy study with at-risk kindergarteners. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 36:17–32. Retrieved from. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/learning-new-words-storybooks-efficacy-study-with/docview/232592032/se-2?accountid=6802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Lee SH. 2016. The effects on young children`s environmental: friendly attitudes by the philosophy-play program using ecological picture books. J Children’s Lit Educ. 17(1):91–116. In Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Knight S. 2013. Int Perspect on Forest Sch: Nat Spaces to Play and Learn Sage. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Knight S, Luff P. 2017. The contribution of forest school to early childhood education for sustainability. Early childhood education and care for sustainability. London: Routledge; p. 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Koo T, Li M. 2016. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 15(2):155–163. DOI:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korteweg L, Gonzalez I, Guillet J. 2010. The stories are the people and the land: three educators respond to environmental teachings in Indigenous children’s literature. Environ Educ Res. 16(3–4):331–350. DOI:10.1080/13504620903549755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen NE, Lee K, Ganea PA. 2018. Do storybooks with anthropomorphized animal characters promote prosocial behaviors in young children? Dev Sci. 21(3):e12590. DOI:10.1111/desc.12590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch-Brown C, Tomlinson C, Short K. 2014. Essentials for children’s literature. Essex. England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mann C, Loft L, Hernández-Morcillo M. 2021. Assessing forest governance innovations in Europe: needs, challenges and ways forward for sustainable forest ecosystem service provision. Ecosyst Serv. 52:101384. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín NM, Hageman JL, Montgomery SE, Rule AC. 2019. A content analysis of thirty children’s picture books about ecology. J STEM Arts, Crafts, and Constructions. 4(1):83–120.
   Google Scholar
• MEA (Millennium ecosystem assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington (DC): Island press.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhold JL, Malkus AJ. 2005. Adolescent environmental behaviors: can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environ Behav. 37(4):511–532. DOI:10.1177/0013916504269665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengist W, Soromessa T. 2019. Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis. Environ Syst Res. 8(1):1–18. DOI:10.1186/s40068-019-0150-4.
   Google Scholar
• Müller A, Olscheweski R, Unterberger C, Knoke T. 2020. The valuation of forest ecosystem services as a tool for management planning–A choice experiment. J Environ Manage. 271:111008. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrosky MM, Mouzourou C, Dorsey EA, Favazza PC, Leboeuf LM. 2015. Pick a book, any book: using children’s books to support positive attitudes toward peers with disabilities. Young Exceptional Children. 18(1):30–43. DOI:10.1177/1096250613512666.
   Google Scholar
• Otto S, Evans GW, Moon MJ, Kaiser FG. 2019. The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environ Change. 58:101947. DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan Ö, Tekkaya C, Geban Ö. 2004. Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of ecological concepts. J Sci Educ Technol. 13(1):95–105. DOI:10.1023/B:JOST.0000019642.15673.a3.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer JA. 1994. Acquisition of environmental subject knowledge in pre-school children: an international study. Children’s Environ 11(3): 204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Park SY, Choi N. 2014. The effects of environmental picture book activities on improvement of young children’s vocabulary, knowledge and attitude about environmental preservation. Korean J Child Educ and Care. 14(1):165–191. In Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Parrotta J, Youn Y-C, Camacho LD. 2016. Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecos Serv Manage. 12(1–2):1–4. DOI:10.1080/21513732.2016.1169580.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Dessane EB, Islar M, Kelemen E. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opinion in Environ Sustainability. 26:7–16. DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule A, Atkinson J. 1994. Choosing picture books about ecology. Read Teach. 47(7):586–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson IP, Kaga Y. 2008. The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaiger F, Poschenrieder W, Biber P, Pretzsch H. 2019. Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management. Ecosyst Serv. 39:100993. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi P, Li Z, Li P, Zhang Y, Li B. 2021. Trade-offs among ecosystem services after vegetation restoration in China’s Loess Plateau. Nat Resour Res. 30(3):2703–2713. DOI:10.1007/s11053-021-09841-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulevitz U. 1997. Writing with pictures: how to write and illustrate children’s books. 1515 broadway. New York (NY 10036): Watson-Guptill Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Sekercioglu CH, Webb EL, Prawiradilaga DM, Lohman DJ, Pierce NE, Diesmos AC, Rao M, Ehrlich PR. 2010. Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodivers Conserv. 19(4):1175–1188. DOI:10.1007/s10531-009-9745-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman M, Eckhoff A. 2012. Teaching young learners about sustainability. Childhood Educ. 88(6):354–359. DOI:10.1080/00094056.2012.741476.
   Google Scholar
• Squire SJ. 1996. Landscapes, places and geographic spaces: texts of Betrix Potter as cultural communication. GeoJournal. 38(1):75–86. DOI:10.1007/BF00209121.
   Google Scholar
• Summers M, Childs A. 2007. Student science teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: an empirical study of three postgraduate training cohorts. Res Sci & Technol Educ. 25(3):307–327. DOI:10.1080/02635140701535067.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2011. TEEB manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. www.teebweb.org
   Google Scholar
• Torkar G. 2016. Secondary school students’ environmental concerns and attitudes toward forest ecosystem services: implications for biodiversity education. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 11(18):11019–11031.
   Google Scholar
• Torkar G, Krašovec U. 2019. Students’ attitudes toward forest ecosystem services, knowledge about ecology, and direct experience with forests. Ecosyst Serv. 37:100916. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. 2013. Annual report 213. UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017. Education for sustainable development goals: learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
   Google Scholar
• Wagner L. 2013. By the numbers: a quantitative content analysis of children’s picturebooks. Front Psychol. 4:850. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason‐Ellam L. 2010. Children’s literature as a springboard to place‐based embodied learning. Environ Educ Res. 16(3–4):279–294. DOI:10.1080/13504620903549771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff S, Schulp C, Verburg P. 2015. Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol Indic. 55:159–171. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWF. 2014. Living planet report 2013. Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen AA, Whitehurst GJ. 2003. Dialogic reading: a shared picture book reading intervention for preschoolers. On reading books to children: parents and teachers. New Jersey: Erlbaum; p. 177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Zoderer BM, Tasser E, Carver S, Tappeiner U. 2019. Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles. Ecosyst Serv. 37:100938. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar