Importance of large-diameter conifer snags for saproxylic beetle (Cerambycidae) assemblages in old-growth remnants in Japan

References

• Borcard D, Legendre P. 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model. 153(1–2):51–68. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanger Y, Sirois L. 2007. Postfire succession of saproxylic arthropods, with emphasis on Coleoptera, in the north boreal forest of quebec. Environ Entomol. 36(1):128–141. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-36.1.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet J, Isacsson G. 2009. Influence of snag characteristics on saproxylic beetle assemblages in a south Swedish beech forest. J Insect Conserv. 13(5):515–528. doi: 10.1007/s10841-008-9200-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell FL, Kremsater LL, Wind E. 1999. Managing to sustain vertebrate richness in forests of the Pacific Northwest: relationships within stands. Environ Rev. 7(3):97–146. doi: 10.1139/a99-010.
   Google Scholar
• Chao A, Chiu CH. 2016. Species richness: estimation and comparison. In: Balakrishnan N, Colton T, Everitt B, Piegorsch W, Ruggeri F Teugels JL, editors. Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online; pp. 1–26. doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat03432.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Cherepanov AI. 1988. Cerambycidae of Northern Asia / A.I. Cherepanov. New Delhi: Translated and published under an agreement for the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., by Amerind Pub. Co. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.46344.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography. 30(5):609–628. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR. 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model. 196(3–4):483–493. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dray S, Pelissier R, Couteron P, Fortin MJ, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR, Bellier E, Bivand R, Blanchet FG, De Caceres M, et al. 2012. Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecol Monogr. 82(3):257–275. doi:10.1890/11-1183.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnstrom B, Holmer M. 2007. Nationalynckeln till sveriges flora och fauna. Skalbaggar: langhorningar. Coleoptera: cerambycidae. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, SLU.
   Google Scholar
• Farris KL, Garton EO, Heglund PJ, Zack S, Shea PJ. 2002. Woodpecker foraging and the successional decay of ponderosa pine. USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep. SW-GTR. 181:237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Fossestol KO, Sverdrup-Thygeson A. 2009. Saproxylic beetles in high stumps and residual downed wood on clear-cuts and in forest edges. Scand J Forest Res. 24(5):403–416. doi: 10.1080/02827580903143871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franc N. 2007. Standing or downed dead trees — does it matter for saproxylic beetles in temperate oak-rich forest? Can J For Res. 37(12):2494–2507. doi: 10.1139/X07-096.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin JF, Berg DR, Thornburgh DA, Tappeiner JC. 1997. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In: Kohm K Franklin J, editors Creating a forest for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management. Washington: Island Press; pp. 111–139.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin JF, Cromack K, Denison JW, McKee A, Maser C, Sedell J, Swanson FJ, Juday G. 1981. Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep. NW. 118:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin JF, Spies TA, Van Pelt R, Carey AB, Thornburgh DA, Berg DR, Lindenmayer DB, Harmon ME, Keeton WS, Shaw DC, et al. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For Ecol Manage. 155(1–3):399–423. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00575-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita H, Hirayama H, Akita K. 2018. The longhorn beetles of Japan (1). Vol. 10, Tokyo: Mushi-sha. Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb H, Ball JP, Johansson T, Atlegrim O, Hjalten J, Danell K. 2005. Effects of management on coarse woody debris volume and composition in boreal forests in northern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 20(3):213–222. doi: 10.1080/02827580510008392.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb H, Pettersson RB, Hjalten J, Hilszczanski J, Ball JP, Johansson T, Atlegrim O, Danell K. 2006. Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates. Biol Conserv. 129(4):437–450. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossner MM, Lachat T, Brunet J, Isacsson G, Bouget C, Brustel H, Brandl R, Weisser WW, Muller J. 2013. Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests. Conserv Biol. 27(3):605–614. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove SJ. 2002. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33(1):1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150507.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond HEJ, Langor DW, Spence JR. 2001. Early colonization of populus wood by saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera). Can J For Res. 31(7):1175–1183. doi: 10.1139/x01-057.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond HEJ, Langor DW, Spence JR. 2004. Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) using populus in boreal aspen stands of western Canada: spatiotemporal variation and conservation of assemblages. Can J For Res. 34(1):1–19. doi: 10.1139/x03-192.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkala O, Martikainen P, Kouki J. 2016. Decadal effects of emulating natural disturbances in forest management on saproxylic beetle assemblages. Biol Conserv. 194:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irmler U, Arp H, Notzold R. 2010. Species richness of saproxylic beetles in woodlands is affected by dispersion ability of species, age and stand size. J Insect Conserv. 14(3):227–235. doi: 10.1007/s10841-009-9249-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibashi S, Takao G, Takahashi M, Abe S, Sasaki S. 2011. Long-term dynamics of stand structure and growth of mixed coniferous/broad-leaved forests in northern Japan. J Jpn For Soc. 93(2):64–72. Japanese with English summary. doi: 10.4005/jjfs.93.64.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihama F, Takeda T, Oguma H, Takenaka A. 2010. Comparison of effects of spatial autocorrelation on distribution predictions of four rare plant species in the watarase wetland. Ecol Res. 25(6):1057–1069. doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0732-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen P, Hebert C, Fortin D. 2011. Biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forest: black spruce and balsam fir snags harbour distinct assemblages of saproxylic beetles. Biodivers Conserv. 20(13):2917–2932. doi: 10.1007/s10531-011-0127-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Nitterus K, Stighall K. 2004. Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made deciduous high stumps retained for conservation. Biol Conserv. 118(2):163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Weslien J. 2003. Felled or standing retained wood - it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. For Ecol Manage. 175(1–3):425–435. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00143-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnstrom B. 1998. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers Conserv. 7(6):749–764. doi: 10.1023/A:1008888319031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson BG, Kruys N, Ranius T. 2005. Ecology of species living on dead wood - lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fenn. 39(2):289–309. doi: 10.14214/sf.390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Na S, Doh J, Yi H. 2020. Community structure of Korean fir (Abies koreana) snag-dwelling arthropods on mt. Halla National Park, Jeju Island, Korea. Entomol Res. 50(2):113–123. doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Nam JW, Yi H. 2013. The community structures of the coniferous and deciduous dead wood-dwelling arthropods in Korea. Entomol Res. 43(5):288–298. doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kira T. 1991. Forest ecosystems of east and southeast-Asia in a global perspective. Ecol Res. 6(2):185–200. doi: 10.1007/BF02347161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyosawa H, Hayakawa H, O T, Hori K, Kobayashi Y. 1981. Atlas of longicorn beetles of Nagano prefecture. Japan. Matsumoto: Folklore Museum. Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Horiuchi S, Suzuki KF, Mori AS. 2021. Tree height–diameter allometry of 75 major tree species in Japan. J Jpn For Soc. 103:168–171. Japanese with English summary.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstrom M, Lumatjarvi J. 2000. Saproxylic beetles on aspen in commercial forests: a simulation approach to species richness. For Ecol Manage. 126(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00095-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komonen A, Muller J. 2018. Dispersal ecology of deadwood organisms and connectivity conservation. Conserv Biol. 32(3):535–545. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Lindberg H, Vanha-Majamaa I, Keto-Tokoi P, Punttila P. 2019. Low-level retention forestry, certification, and biodiversity: case Finland. Ecol Process. 8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13717-019-0198-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langor DW, Hammond HEJ, Spence JR, Jacobs J, Cobb TP. 2008. Saproxylic insect assemblages in Canadian forests: diversity, ecology, and conservation. Can Entomol. 140(4):453–474. doi: 10.4039/n07-LS02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm. Ecology. 74(6):1659–1673. doi: 10.2307/1939924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhe A, Lindelow A. 2004. Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. For Ecol Manage. 203(1–3):1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhe A, Lindelow A, Asenblad N. 2005. Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodivers Conserv. 14(12):3033–3053. doi: 10.1007/s10531-004-0314-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeto K, Sato S, Miyata H. 2002. Species diversity of longicorn beetles in humid warm-temperate forests: the impact of forest management practices on old-growth forest species in southwestern Japan. Biodivers Conserv. 11(11):1919–1937. doi: 10.1023/A:1020849012649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Punttila P, Kaila L, Rauh J. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature management and old-growth boreal forests in southern FInland. Biol Conserv. 94(2):199–209. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00175-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori K. 2004. Breedings and observations of rhagiini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from Japan (1). Gekkan-Mushi. 404:36–41. Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa M, Kurahashi A, Kaji M, Hogetsu T. 2001. The effects of selection cutting on regeneration of Picea jezoensis and Abies sachalinensis in the sub-boreal forests of Hokkaido, northern Japan. For Ecol Manage. 146(1–3):15–23. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00445-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narukawa Y, Iida S, Tanouchi H, Abe S, Yamamoto S. 2003. State of fallen logs and the occurrence of conifer seedlings and saplings in boreal and subalpine old-growth forests in Japan. Ecol Res. 18(3):267–277. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2003.00553.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson SG, Hedin J, Niklasson M. 2001. Biodiversity and its assessment in boreal and nemoral forests. Scand J For Res. 16(sup003):10–26. doi: 10.1080/028275801300090546.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson SG, Niklasson M, Hedin J, Aronsson G, Gutowski JM, Linder P, Ljungberg H, Mikusinski G, Ranius T. 2002. Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manage. 161(1–3):189–204. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00480-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa O. 1995. Atlas: environmental change in modern Japan. Tokyo, Japanese: Asakura-shoten.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura N, Kato K, Sumida A, Ono K, Tanouchi H, Iida S, Hoshino D, Yamamoto SI, Hara T. 2010. Effects of life history strategies and tree competition on species coexistence in a sub-boreal coniferous forest of Japan. Plant Ecol. 206(1):29–40. doi: 10.1007/s11258-009-9622-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohbayashi N, Niisato T. 2007. Longicorn beetles of Japan. Ohbayashi N, Niisato T, eds. Hadano, Japanese: Tokai University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohbayashi N, Niisato T, Hasegawa M. 2010. New taxa and nomenclatural changes after the “longicorn beetles of Japan” (collecptera, Cerambycidae). Gekkan-Mushi. 476:2–13. Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Ohsawa M. 2007. The role of isolated old oak trees in maintaining beetle diversity within larch plantations in the central mountainous region of Japan. For Ecol Manage. 250(3):215–226. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohsawa M. 2010. Beetle families as indicators of coleopteran diversity in forests: a study using malaise traps in the central mountainous region of Japan. J Insect Conserv. 14(5):479–484. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9276-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onodera K, Tokuda S. 2015. Do larger snags stand longer?-snag longevity in mixed conifer-hardwood forests in Hokkaido, Japan. Ann For Sci. 72(5):621–629. doi: 10.1007/s13595-015-0478-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onodera K, Tokuda S, Hirano Y, Yamamoto S. 2017. Vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles within snag trunks retained in plantation forests. J Insect Conserv. 21(1):7–14. doi: 10.1007/s10841-016-9947-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paillet Y, Berges L, Hjalten J, Odor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Romermann M, Bijlsma RJ, De Bruyn L, Fuhr M, Grandin U, et al. 2009. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv Biol. 24(1):101–112. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 87(10):2614–2625. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranius T, Jansson N. 2000. The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biol Conserv. 95(1):85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00007-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranius T, Johansson V, Schroeder M, Caruso A. 2015. Relative importance of habitat characteristics at multiple spatial scales for wood-dependent beetles in boreal forest. Landscape Ecol. 30(10):1931–1942. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0221-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Buddle CM. 2007. Host-use patterns of saproxylic phloeophagous and xylophagous Coleoptera adults and larvae along the decay gradient in standing dead black spruce and aspen. Ecography. 30(6):737–748. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Nagao Y, Suzuki T. 1993. On the distribution of Cerambycidae of hokkaido. Jezoensis. 20:49–162. Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Schiegg K. 2001. Saproxylic insect diversity of beech: limbs are richer than trunks. For Ecol Manage. 149(1–3):295–304. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00563-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecolog Bullet. 49:11–41.
   Google Scholar
• Siitonen J, Martikainen P, Punttila P, Rauh J. 2000. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. For Ecol Manage. 128(3):211–225. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00148-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D. 2004. WinBugs user manual, version 1.4. Cambridge: Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Stenbacka F, Hjalten J, Hilszczanski J, Dynesius M. 2010. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity. Ecol Appl. 20(8):2310–2321. doi: 10.1890/09-0815.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Ims R. 2002. The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biol Conserv. 106(3):347–357. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00261-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D, Arnold R, Spiegelhalter D. 2004. GeoBugs user manual, version 1.2. Cambridge: Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL. 2009. Habitat associations of saproxylic beetles in the southeastern United States: a comparison of forest types, tree species and wood postures. For Ecol Manage. 257(2):653–664. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulyshen MD, Šobotník J. 2018. An introduction to the diversity, ecology, and conservation of saproxylic insects. In: Ulyshen M, editor. Saproxylic insects: diversity, ecology and conservation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; pp. 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vaisanen R, Bistrom O, Heliovaara K. 1993. Subcortical Coleoptera in dead pines and spruces - is primeval species composition maintained in managed forests. Biodivers Conserv. 2(2):95–113. doi: 10.1007/BF00056127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe S. 2003. Evaluation and problems of natural forest management: technical issues occurring in Japan in which natural forest management failed to become established, resulting in forest degradation. J Jpn For Soc. 85:273–281. Japanese with English summary.
   Google Scholar
• Wikars LO, Sahlin E, Ranius T. 2005. A comparison of three methods to estimate species richness of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in logs and high stumps of Norway spruce. Can Entomol. 137(3):304–324. doi: 10.4039/n04-104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaura Y, Akashi N, Unno A, Tsushima T, Nagasaka A, Nagasaka Y, Ozaki K. 2018. Retention experiment for plantation forestry in Sorachi, Hokkaido (REFRESH): a large-scale experiment for retaining broad-leaved trees in conifer plantation. Bull Of FFPRI. 17(1):91–109.
   Google Scholar