Effects of dental arch size variation on orthodontic forces delivered by preformed Ni-Ti archwires

References

• Andrews LF. Straight wire: the concept and appliance. San Diego: LA Wells Company; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Proffit WR and, Larson BE. Section III Biomechanics, mechanics, and contemporary orthodontic appliances. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, et al., editors. Contemporary orthodontics. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2014. p. 255–256.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Oda S, Arai K, Nakahara R. Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saze N, Arai K. Variation in form of mandibular, light, round, preformed NiTi archwires. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:796–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachi A, Tochigi K, Saze N, et al. Impact of the prefabricated forms of NiTi archwires on orthodontic forces delivered to the mandibular dental arch. Prog Orthod. [under revision].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little RM. Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment. Br J Orthod. 1990;17:235–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmik SG, Hazare PV, Bhowmik H. Correlation of the arch forms of male and female subjects with those of preformed rectangular nickel-titanium archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:364–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, et al. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal T, Memili B, Usumez S, Sari Z. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:941–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal T, Usumez S, Memili B, et al. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:809–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaj M, Spalj S, Pavlin D, et al. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:919–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball RL, Miner RM, Will LA, et al. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki A, Arai K, Oda I. Mandibular dental-basal arch forms in skeletal Class III patients with mandibular prognathism. Orthod Waves. 2017;76: 174–183.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara C, Drage KJ, Sandy JR, et al. An evaluation of clinicians’ choices when selecting archwires. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton JM, Sinclair PM, Jones DL, et al. A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:478–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun S, Hnat WP, Leschinsky R, et al. An evaluation of the shape of some popular nickel titanium alloy preformed arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda T, Saze N, Tochigi K, et al. Transverse adjustment of preformed stainless steel archwires to the dental arch form. Orthod Waves. 2018;77: 142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Badawi HM, Toogood RW, Carey JPR, et al. Three-dimensional orthodontic force measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:518–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tochigi K, Oda S, Arai K. Influences of archwire size and ligation method on the force magnitude delivered by nickel-titanium alloy archwires in a simulation of mandibular right lateral incisor linguoversion. Dent Mater J. 2015;34:388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tochigi K, Saze N, Arai K. Impact of passive self-ligation and conventional elastic ligation on orthodontic force in the simulation of a mandibular lateral incisor linguoversion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157:320–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Ekizer A, et al. Evaluation of mandibular transverse widths in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(4):611–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Årtun J, Krogstad O. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination. A study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar