Energy-efficient retrofitting with exterior shading device in hot and humid climate – case studies from fully glazed multi-storied office buildings in Chennai, India

References

• 2017. ONE PAGE STATEMENT ON TARIFF RATES AS IN THE TNERC ORDER NO: T.P.No.1 of 2017. https://www.tangedco.gov.in/linkpdf/ONEPAGESTATEMENT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aboulnaga, M., M. Moustafa. 2016.Sustainability of Higher Educational Buildings: Retrofitting Approach to Improve Energy Performance and Mitigate CO2 Emissions in Hot ClimatesRenewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability 1: 28. doi:10.1051/rees/2016016.
   Google Scholar
• Aksamija, Ajla Design methods for sustainable, high-performance building facades. Advances in Building Energy Research 10, 1–23. doi:10.1080/17512549.2015.1083885.
   Google Scholar
• Aurora, D. M., and H. S. Hasibuan. 2020. “IOP Conf.” Series: Earth and Environmental Science 448: 012058.
   Google Scholar
• Average exchange rate in 2020 for Indian Rupee to US $. Google reference: https://www.exchangerates.org.uk/USD-INR-spot-exchange-rates-history-2020.html
   Google Scholar
• Ayodele, T., M. Oyinlola, and B. Subhes. 2020. “A Review of Retrofit Interventions for Residential Buildings in Hot Humid Climates.” International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 11 (5): 251–257. doi:10.18178/ijesd.2020.11.5.1258.
   Google Scholar
• Balaras, C. A., K. Droutsa, A. A. Argiriou, and D. N. Asimakopoulos. 2000. “Potential for Energy Conservation in Apartment Buildings.” Energy and Buildings 31 (2): 143–154. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00028-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basarir, Bahar, Diri, Berrin, Diri, Cüneyt, et al. 2012. “Energy Efficient Retrofit Methods at the Building Envelopes of the School Buildings (Department of Architecture, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Findikli, 34427, Turkey).”
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, A., and W. T. Thumm. 2014. “Passive Building Systems Vs. Active Building Systems and the Return on Investment.” In: Building Innovation Conference & Expo 2014 Jan 6 -10, Washington, DC, USA. National Institute of Building Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Boake, T. M. 2014. Hot climate double facades: Avoiding solar gain. Facade Tectonics 14: 2–24. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:201738779
   Google Scholar
• Carletti, C., F. Sciurpi, and L. Pierangioli. 2014. “The Energy Upgrading of Existing Buildings: Window and Shading Device Typologies for Energy Efficiency Refurbishment.” Sustainability 6 (8): 5354–5377. doi:10.3390/su6085354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, C. 2020. Envelope Performance Analysis of Office Buildings in Warm and Humid Climate: From Case Studies of Multi-storied Office Buildings in Chennai book Sustainable Urban Architecture Springer Singapore doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9585-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C., R. Fuller, and M. Luther. 2005, 01. “Energy-efficient Envelope Design for high-rise Apartments.” Energy and Buildings 37 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidiac, S. E., E. J. C. Catania, E. Morofsky, and S. Foo. 2011. “A Screening Methodology for Implementing cost-effective Energy Retrofit Measures in Canadian Office Buildings.” Energy and Buildings 43 (2–3): 614–620. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, S. K., and E. S. Lin. 2015. “Tensile Membrane Façade: Performance Analysis of Energy, Daylighting and Material Optical Properties 10th Conference on Advanced Building Skins November 2015 Bern, Switzerland.”
   Google Scholar
• DOE- 2.2 building energy use and cost analysis program volume 4 libraries & report march. 2009. Lawrence Berkeley national laboratory, USA.
   Google Scholar
• El-Darwish I and Gomaa M. 2017. “Retrofitting strategy for building envelopes to achieve energy Alexandria.” Engineering Journal 56: 579–589.
   Google Scholar
• EN 13363-1:2003 (E)3Foreword This document EN 13363-1:2003 has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN /TC 89. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Conservation Building Code 2017. 2017. ECBC 2017 1st edition Vol 1. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Energy Efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• FacadeRetrofit.org 2014 Project data base http://facaderetrofit.org/ .
   Google Scholar
• 2017 Technical specification of stamisol®. “ft 381 stamisol® color”. www.ferrari-architecture.com
   Google Scholar
• Gugliermetti, F., and F. Bisegna. 2004. “Book – New and Renewable Energy Technologies for Sustainable Development Chapter - Dynamic Windows in Buildings Ebook.”
   Google Scholar
• Helen Rose Wilson, A., and M. Elstner. 2018. “Spot Landing: Determining the Light and Solar Properties of Fritted and Coated Glass.” doi:10.7480/cgc.6.2133.
   Google Scholar
• Illuminance calculation LEED v4EQ opt2. ( Last Access 18. December. 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Ji, S., Y. Hwang, and B. Lee. 2014. “A Study on Shading Shape Elements and Kinetic Methods for Developing A Typology of Responsive Kinetic Façade. Proc. Spring Ann.” Conferenc Architectural Institute of Korea 34: 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Khin Kiet Lau, A., E. Salleh, C. Haw Lim, and M. Y. Sulaiman. 2016. “Potential of Shading Devices and Glazing Configurations on Cooling Energy Savings for high-rise Office Buildings in hot-humid Climates: The Case of Malaysia.” International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment,Volume 5 (2): 387–399. 2212-6090. doi:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., M. R. Asl, and W. Yan. 2015. Parametric BIM-based Energy Simulation for Buildings with Complex Kinetic Façades. research paper.
   Google Scholar
• Köppen, W. 1936. “C.” In Das geographische System der Klimate [The Geographic System of Climates] (PDF). Handbuch der Klimatologie. 1. Berlin: Borntraeger. Archived (PDF) from the Original on 2016-03-04 (Berlin: Schweizerbart and Borntraeger science publishers) 10–16, edited by W. Köppen and R. Geiger (publisher), Retrieved 2016-09-02.
   Google Scholar
• Lavin, C., and F. Fiorito. 2017. “Optimization of an External Perforated Screen for Improved Daylighting and Thermal Performance of an Office Space.” Procedia Engineering 180: 571–581. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.216.
   Google Scholar
• Malatji, E. M., J. Zhang, and X. Xia. 2013. “A Multiple Objective Optimization Models for Building Energy Efficiency Investment Decision.” Energy and Buildings 61: 81–87. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara, F. 2010. “Technical & Practice - Retrofit.” Architect’s Journal. 08.04.10. 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, A., and A, Carlson. 2014. state-the-art Methodology to Assess Energy Façade Retrofits (EFR) ARCC/EAAE 2014 |. Beyond Architecture: New Intersections & Connections.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, A., M. Patterson, A. Carlson, and D. Noble. 2016. “Fundamentals in Façade Retrofit Practice, Procedia Engineering, Volume.” 118: 934–941.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, R., M. Abdullah, M. Asmoni, Y. M. J. Lee, and M. Jaafar. 2015. “An Overview of Green Retrofitting Implementation in Non-Residential Existing Buildings.” Jurnal Teknologi 73 (5).
   Google Scholar
• Poel, B., G. van Cruchten, and C. Balaras. 2007. “Energy Performance Assessment of Existing Dwellings.” Energy and Buildings 39 (4): 393–403. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polly, B., M. Gestwick, M. Bianchi, R. Anderson, S. Horowitz, C. Christensen, and R. Judkoff. 2011. Optimal Residential Energy Efficiency Retrofit Packages. Oak Ridge, TN: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Premier, A., and A. Dehò. 2013. “Unconventional Solar Screens.” Tenda International 1: 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Saboor, S., G. Kirankumar, and A. Setty. 2016. “Effect of Window Overhang Shade on Heat Gain of Various Single Glazing Window Glasses for Passive Cooling.” Procedia Technology 23: 439–446. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.048.
   Google Scholar
• Saifelnasr, S. S. 2015. “A Design Chart to Determine the Dimensions of A Horizontal Shading Device over an Equator-Facing Window as A Function of the Latitude and the Shading Height.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 216: 724–735. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.069.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, A., H. Sabry, and T. Rakha. 2012. “External Perforated Solar Screens for Daylighting in Residential Desert Buildings: Identification of Minimum Perforation Percentages.” Solar Energy 86 (6): 1929–1940. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., I. J. Lazarus, and V. V. N. Kishore. 2015. “Effect of Internal Woven Roller Shade and Glazing on the Energy and Daylighting Performances of an Office Building in the Cold Climate of Shillong.” Applied Energy 159: 317–333. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Table 1. Points for day lit floor area: - Spatial daylight autonomy 2020 . “Table 2. Points for Daylight Floor Area.” https://www.usgbc.org/credits/healthcare/v4
   Google Scholar
• Tariq Sheikh, W., and Q. Asghar. 2019. “Adaptive Biomimetic Facades: Enhancing Energy Efficiency of Highly Glazed Buildings.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 8 (3): 319–331. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2019.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thumann, A., and W. J. Younger. 2008. Handbook of Energy Audits. 7th ed Fairmont Press: Lilburn, GA. pg 418.
   Google Scholar
• Transmittance and reflectance values according to EN 410. 2011. Table 1 and 2 for 6 mm low-iron glass panes with white, dusty-grey, or black Screenprinted coatings
   Google Scholar
• Zhenjun, M., P. Cooper, D. Daly, and L. Ledo. 2012. “Existing Building Retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art,Energy and Buildings.” Clinical Infectious Diseases: an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 55 (6): 889–902. doi:10.1093/cid/cis546.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar