Towards an earthquake-resistant architectural design with the image classification method

References

• Abdalzaher, M. S., A. E. Hussein, M. F. Mostafa, and M. S. Mahmoud. 2023. “Employing Machine Learning and IoT for Earthquake Early Warning System in Smart Cities.” Energies 16 (1): 495. doi:10.3390/en16010495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalzaher, M. S., S. S. R. Moustafa, H. E. A. Hafiez, and W. F. Ahmed. 2022. “An Optimized Learning Model Augment Analyst Decisions for Seismic Source Discrimination.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing 60: 1–12. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2022.3208097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2017. ’Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures: ASCE Standard 72. Accessed 3 March 2023. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/asce-7
   Google Scholar
• Bingöl, K. 2020. ‘Depreme dayanikli mimari tasarim aşamasinda derin öğrenme ve görüntü siralama yöntemi ile burulma düzensizliği tespiti’. Unpublished MArch Thesis. Çankaya University.
   Google Scholar
• Bingöl, K., A. Er Akan, H. T. Örmecioğlu, and A. Er. 2020. “Depreme dayanıklı mimari tasarımda yapay zeka uygulamalari: derin öğrenme ve görüntü işleme yöntemi ile düzensiz taşıyıcı sistem tespiti.” Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi 35 (4): 2197–2210. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.647981.
   Google Scholar
• Caetano, I., L. Santos, and A. Leitão. 2020. “Computational Design in Architecture: Defining Parametric, Generative, and Algorithmic Design.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 9 (2): 287–300. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celep, Z. 2018. ‘Deprem mühendisliğine giriş ve depreme dayanikli yapi tasarimi’. Beta Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T. W., and W. Huang. 2014. “Computational Architecture: Connecting the Physical and Virtual Worlds.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 3 (4): 335–336. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2014.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• CMDE (Chairmanship For The Management of Disasters and Emergencies). 2018. Turkish Building Earthquake Code: TBEC. Accessed 20 March 2023. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/File/GeneratePdf?mevzuatNo=32668&mevzuatTur=Teblig&mevzuatTertip=5
   Google Scholar
• Çolakoğlu, B., and T. Yazar. 2007. “An Innovative Design Education Approach: Computational Design Teaching for Architecture.” Metu Jfa 24 (2): 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• De Stefano, M., and B. Pintucchi. 2008. “A Review of Research on Seismic Behavior of Irregular Building Structures Since 2002.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 6 (2): 285–308. doi:10.1007/s10518-007-9052-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S. C., P. K. Das, and P. Sengupta. 2017. “Seismic Behaviour of Irregular Structures.” Structural Engineering International 27 (4): 526–545. doi:10.2749/222137917X14881938989765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECS (European Committee For Standardization). 2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings: Eurocode8. Accessed 20 March 2023. https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EN-Eurocodes/eurocode-8-design-structures-earthquake-resistance
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, E., and A. Sorguç. 2011. “Hesaplamalı modeller araciliğiyla mimari ve doğal biçim türetim ilkelerini ilişkilendirmek.” Metu Jfa 28 (2): 269–281. doi:10.4305/METU.JFA.2011.2.15.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, E. 2005. “A Critical Analysis of Earthquake-Resistant Architectural Provisions.” Architectural Science Review 48 (4): 295–304. doi:10.3763/asre.2005.4837.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2010. “Earthquake-Resistant Design Concepts an Introduction to the NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures: FEMA P-749” National Institute of Building Sciences Building Seismic Safety Council Publishing. Accessed 20 March 2023. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_earthquake-resistant-design-concepts_p-749.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2014. “Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage—A Practical guide: FEMA-74.” National Institute of Building Sciences Building Seismic Safety Council Publishing. Accessed March 20 2023. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/risk-management/earthquake/training/fema-e-74.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, H. 2000. “Seismic Resistant Architecture: A Theory for the Architectural Design of Buildings in Seismic Zones.” WCEE 2000:12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Jan 30-Feb 04), Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Gokdemir, H., H. Ozbasaran, M. Dogan, E. Unluoglu, and U. Albayrak. 2013. “Effects of Torsional Irregularity to Structures During Earthquakes.” Engineering Failure Analysis 35: 713–717. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. 2006. “‘Chapter 4. Processing Work on Z/OS: How the System Starts and Manages Batch jobs’ in Z/OS Concepts, Z/OS Basic Skills Information Center, 79-91” Accessed 18 February 2023. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/zosbasics/com.ibm.zos.zconcepts/zconc_whatisbatch.htm
   Google Scholar
• ICC (International Code Council). 2018. International Building Code: IBC-2018. Accessed 20 March 2023. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2018/index
   Google Scholar
• Idemen, A. E. 2003. ‘Bina ağırlık merkezi-rijitlik merkezi ilişkisini mimari tasarim aşamasında kuran bir uzman sistem’. Unpublished MArch Thesis. Istanbul Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali, N., R. K. Leung, and S. Verderber. 2020. “A Review of Computerized Hospital Layout Modelling Techniques and Their Ethical Implications.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 9 (3): 498–513. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2020.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JIA - JASO (The Japan Institute of Architects and Japan Aseismic Safety Organization). 2015. Earthquake-Resistant Design For Architects, Shinkosha Printing Co. Accessed 20 March 2023. http://www.jaso.jp/
   Google Scholar
• Kapanowski, A. 2014. “Python for Education: Permutations.” Python Papers 9 (3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.7042.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, P., S. Chen, and Y. Zheng. 2012. “Artificial Intelligence in Civil Engineering.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 (22): 1–22. doi:10.1155/2012/145974.
   Google Scholar
• Mendi, E. 2005. ‘Evaluation of Architectural Consciousness and Exploration of Architecture-Based Issues in Seismic Design’. Unpublished MArch Thesis. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Morales-Bertran, M., and B. Yıldız. 2020. “Integrating Configuration-Based Seismic Design Principles into Architectural Education: Teaching Strategies for Lecture Courses.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management 16 (4): 310–328. doi:10.1080/17452007.2020.1738995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa, S. S. R., M. S. Abdalzaher, and H. E. Abdelhafiez. 2022. “Seismo-Lineaments in Egypt: Analysis and Implications for Active Tectonic Structures and Earthquake Magnitudes.” Remote Sensing 14 (23): 6151. doi:10.3390/rs14236151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa, S. S. R., M. S. Abdalzaher, F. Khan, M. Metwaly, E. A. Elawadi, and N. S. Al-Arifi. 2021. “A Quantitative Site-Specific Classification Approach Based on Affinity Propagation Clustering.” IEEE Access 9: 155297–155313. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3128284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa, S. S. R., M. S. Abdalzaher, M. Naeem, and M. M. Fouda. 2022. “Seismic Hazard and Site Suitability Evaluation Based on Multicriteria Decision Analysis.” IEEE Access 10: 69511–69530. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3186937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan-Ching, T. 2023. “Applications of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on Computer-Assisted Teaching for Analytical Sketching of Architectural Scene and Construction.” JAABE 22 (3): 1664–1681. doi:10.1080/13467581.2022.2097241.
   Google Scholar
• Öcal, C., and H. H. Ínce. 2012. “‘Türkíye’de mevcut yapı stoğu ve kentsel dönüşüm’.” SDU International Technologic Science Constructional Technologies 4 (2): 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Olafenwa, M. 2018. “Train Image Recognition AI with 5 Lines of Code” Towards data science. Accessed 20 March 2023. https://towardsdatascience.com/train-image-recognition-ai-with-5-lines-of-code-8ed0bdd8d9ba
   Google Scholar
• Omar, H., H. Gaber, M. S. Abdalzaher, and M. Elhadidy. 2022. “Identifying Exposure of Urban Area to Certain Seismic Hazard Using Machine Learning and Gis: A Case Study of Greater Cairo.” Sustainability 14 (17): 10722. doi:10.3390/su141710722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozmen, C., A. Er Akan, and A. I. Unay. 2011. “Analysis of a Historic Masonry Building.” Građevinar 63 (05): 449–458.
   Google Scholar
• PROTA. 2021. “Genel Bakış (General View).” Accessed 10 January 2023. https://www.protayazilim.com/protastructure
   Google Scholar
• Radziszewski, K. 2017. “Artificial Neural Networks as an Architectural Design Tool-Generating New Detail Forms Based on the Roman Corinthian Order Capital.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 245:1–8. 10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062030.
   Google Scholar
• Shojaei, F., and B. Behnam. 2017. “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low-Rise Irregular Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Cumulative Damage Indeks.” Advances in Concrete Construction 5 (4): 407–422. https://doi.org/10.12989/ACC.2017.5.4.407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slak, T., and V. Kilar. 2008. “Assessment of Earthquake Architecture as a Link Between Architecture and Earthquake engineering’.” Prostor 16 (2): 155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyluk, A., and Z. Y. Ilerisoy. 2012. “Impact of Shallow Earthquakes on the Sehzade Mehmet Mosque.” Građevinar 64 (9): 735–740. doi:10.14256/JCE.720.2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun, C., and M. B. Çorakoğlu. 2019. “Architectural Drawing Recognition-A Case Study for Training the Learning Algorithm with Architectural Plan and Section Drawing Images.” Design - Artificial Intelligence 23 (2): 29–34.
   Google Scholar