Enhancing policy and design tools for the coexistence of new and old architectural objects in historic precincts by exploring conservation principles and design approaches

References

• Abdel-Kader, Z. F. 2019. “Infill Design in Heritage Sites Study of Experts’ Preferences and Attitudes.” Journal of Engineering and Applied Science 66 (4): 451‒463.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelsalam, T. 2021. “New Architectural Intervention in Historically Sensitive Contexts: Humanistic Approach in Historic Cairo.” Journal of the Housing and Building National Research Center 17 (1): 41‒59. https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2020.1863745.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab, M. 2018. A Reflexive Reading of Urban Space. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abrar, N. 2019. “Contemporary Architecture in Historical Context (Guidelines from Important International Charters).” In E-Proceedings –Space International Conference 2019 on Architectural Culture and Society, edited by G. K. Erk, K. Cengiz, M. E. Leary-Owhin. Docklands Academy London.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, C. R. 2006. “Responding to Context: Changing Perspective on Appropriate Change in Historic Settings.” APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology 37 (4): 22‒33.
   Google Scholar
• Alfirevic, D., and S. S. Alfirevic. 2015. “Infill Architecture: Design Approaches for In-Between Buildings and “Bond” as Integrative Element.” Arhitektura i Urbanizam 41 (41): 24‒39. https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-8293.
   Google Scholar
• Allies, and M. Urban Practitioners. 2021.“'Citymakers-Pragmatics of the Picturesque: Observations on the Picturesque.' Talk, Organized in London.” https://www.alliesandmorrison.com/talks/citymakers-pragmatics-of-the-picturesque-observations-on-the-picturesque.
   Google Scholar
• Badalge, K. “A New Roof by Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos Turned This Ancient German Castle into an Enlarged Exhibition Space.” ArchDaily. Accessed April 9, 2018. https://www.archdaily.com/892010/a-new-roof-by-nieto-sobejano-arquitectos-turned-this-ancient-german-castle-into-an-enlarged-exhibition-space.
   Google Scholar
• Bakri, A. F., N. Q. Zaman, and H. Kamarudin. 2006. “Understanding Local Community and the Cultural Heritage Values at a World Heritage City: A Grounded Theory Approach.” IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 1067 (1): 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012006.
   Google Scholar
• Basarir, H., Y. Saifi, and S. Ö. Hoskara. 2016. “A Debate on the Top-Down Approach to Architectural Interventions in Conflicted Historic Cities: Jerusalem’s Museum of Tolerance.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 33 (3): 235‒250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytin, C. 2000. ““Architectural Concepts in the Design of New Buildings in Old areas.” [Mevcut Cevrelerde Yeni Yapi Tasariminda Mimari Yaklasimlar].” Yapi 229:51‒58.
   Google Scholar
• Baytin, C. 2003. “4 Cities + 4 New Buildings: Revitalization of Old Urban spaces.” [4 Kent + 4 Yeni Yapi: Eski Kent Mekanlarin Canlandirilmasi].” Mimarist 3 (10): 75‒79.
   Google Scholar
• Bekar, E. 2018. “The Design of New Buildings in Historical Urban Context: Formal Interpretation as a way of Transforming Architectural Elements of the Past.” Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Birlik, S. 2013. “Design within the Historic Environment: A Survey on Administration Preferences.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 106:807‒813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.092.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction, 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brolin, B. C. 1980. Architecture in Context: Fitting New Buildings with Old. Michigan: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Burtenshaw, D., M. Bateman, and G. J. Ashworth. 1991. The European City: A Western Perspective. London: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cantacuzino, S. 1994. “What Makes a Good Building? An Inquiry by Royal Fine Art Commission (RFAC).” In Urban Reader, edited by S. Tiesdell, M. Carmona, 18‒48. London: eBook.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. A. Tiesdell. 2003. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charter, K. 2000. “Principles for Conservation and Restoration of Built Heritage.” Available from http://smartheritage.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03/KRAKOV-CHARTER-2000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Congress Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM). 1933. “La Charte d’Athenes or the Athens Charter, 1933.” In J. Tyrwhitt (Trans) 1946, Paris: The Library of the Graduate School of Design, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1985. “Granada Convention‒Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe.” European Treaty Series. No. 121. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/second-european-conference-of-ministers-responsible-for-the-architectu/16808fde12.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. 2019. “Design in the Historic Environment. Cathedral Communications Limited.” Reproduced from the Building Conservation Directory, 2003 by Cathedral Communications Limited. Retrieved from https://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/design/design.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Demiri, K. 2013. “New Architecture as Infill in Historical Context.” Architecture & Urban Planning 7:44‒50. https://doi.org/10.7250/aup.2013.005.
   Google Scholar
• Designrulz. (2015). “Modern House in Vexin by Jean-Philippe Doré.” Designrulz. Retrieved from https://www.designrulz.com/design/2015/01/modern-house-vexin-jean-philippe-dore/.
   Google Scholar
• DHM/BerlinOnline. “German Historical Museum.” Accessed August 14, 2023https://www.berlin.de/en/museums/3109892-3104050germanhistoricalmuseum.en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Doratli, N. 2005. “Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters: A Model for Determining the Most Relevant Strategic Approach.” European Planning Studies 13 (5): 749‒772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500139558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudzic-Gyurkovich, K. 2017. “Forming of Public Spaces of Lisbon: History and the Present Day.” Teka Komisji Urbanistyki I Architektury Pan Oddział W Krakowie XLV:387‒404.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U., and G. de Michele, edited by 2005. Historia Piękna (History of Beauty), 415. Poznań: Rebis.
   Google Scholar
• Eleishe, A. M. 1994. “Contextualism in architecture: A comparative study of environmental perception.” PhD diss., The University of Michigan, pp. 63‒75.
   Google Scholar
• Elkad-Lehman, I., and H. Greensfeld. 2011. “Intertextuality as an Interpretative Method in Qualitative Research.” Narratives Inquiry 21 (2): 258‒275. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21.2.05elk.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsea, D . edited by. (2021, October 7) “Pragmatics of the Picturesque: Strategies for the Contemporary City”. CitymakersVol. 3. London: Allies and Morrison Urban Practitioners. Retrieved from https://user-volbuqj.cld.bz/CITYMAKERS-MAGAZINE-2021-FINAL-digital.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2021. Urban Sustainability: How Can Cities Become Sustainable? Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/downloads/ad534d6b69c849c7a6709b202cb44cca/1678887524/urban-sustainability.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, L. 1946. Manifesto Blanco. White Manifesto). Milano: Galleria Appollinaire.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge, 49. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, G. 2016. “'Contemporary Architecture in Historical Contexts: For a System of Values.'.” Techne 12: 182‒189.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, M. 2015. ““Issues of the Central Industrial Industrial District Architecture” Conservation.” Teka Komisji Urbanistyki I Architektury Pan Oddział W Krakowie XLIII:39‒55.
   Google Scholar
• Gambassi, R. 2016. “Identity of Modern Architecture in Historical City Environments.” Architecture and Engineering 1 (2): 27‒42. https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2016-1-2-27-42.
   Google Scholar
• Getty Conservation Institute. (2013, May 21). “Minding the Gap: The Role of Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment.” Online Symposium. The J. Paul Getty Trust. Retrieved from https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/public_programs/conferences/minding_gap_sympos.html.
   Google Scholar
• Groat, L. N. 1988. “Contextual Compatibility in Architecture: An Issue of Personal Tastes?” In Environmental Aesthetics: Theory Research and Application, edited by J. Nasar, 228‒253. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571213.023.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. 2015. “Transformation of the Urban Tissue and Courtyard of Residential Architecture: With a Focus on the Discourses and Plans of Paris in the 20th Century.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 14 (2): 435‒442. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins and Brown Architectural Firm. Plumstead Center. ArchDaily. Accessed September 21, 2021. https://www.archdaily.com/968792/plumstead-centre-hawkins-brown.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, A. 2015. Intertextuality in Discourse. eds. Tannen, D, Heidi E. Hamilton, H. E.D, Schiffrin. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, C. M., edited by 1996. Strategic Planning for Private Higher Education. New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iamandi, C. 1997. “The Charters of Athens of 1931 and 1933: Coincidence, Controversy and Convergence.” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 2 (1): 17‒28. https://doi.org/10.1179/135050397793138934.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1931. “The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments.” Adopted at the First International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Athens 1931. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/en/167-the-athens-charter-for-the-restoration-of-historic-monuments.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1965. “International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites.” (The Venice Charter 1964). 2nd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, 1964. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1972. “Resolutions of the Symposium on the Introduction of Contemporary Architecture into Ancient Groups of Buildings.” At the 3rd ICOMOS General Assembly. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts/180-articles-en-francais/chartes-et-normes/383.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1973. “Resolutions of the Symposium Devoted to the Study of the Streetscape in Historic Towns.” Lausanne. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/publications/lausanne1973/lausanne1973-10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1975. “The Amsterdam Declaration- Congress on the European Architectural Heritage.” 21‒25 October 1975. France: ICOMOS. Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/en/and/169-the-declaration-of-amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1987. “Washington Charter‒ Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas.” Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179-articles-enfrancais/resources/charters-and-standards?start=22.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 2013. “The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance.” Australia ICOMOS, Australia. Retrieved from http://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2145/.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 2017. “Delhi Declaration on Heritage and Democracy.” Retrieved from https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/GA2017_DelhiDeclaration_20180117_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 2020. European Quality Principles for EU-Funded Interventions with Potential Impact Upon Cultural Heritage. France: ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Historic Building Conservation. (2021, July 22). “Conservation of Historic Environment.” Designing Buildings. Retrieved from https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Conservation_of_the_historic_environment.
   Google Scholar
• James, S. 1992. Architecture for a Changing World. London: Academy Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Japan experience. (2018, December 20). Historic Streetscapes Preservation Districts in Japan. Japan Experience. Retrieved from https://www.japan-experience.com/plan-your-trip/to-know/traveling-japan/preservation-areas.
   Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 2007. “International Charters on Urban Conservation: Some Thoughts on the Principles Expressed in Current International Doctrine.” City & Time 3 (3): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, K., and N. Motamed 2003. “The Tale of Two Cities: Urban Planning of the City of Isfahan in the Past and Present.” Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium for Space Syntax, London, November 21-24.
   Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. 2015. “The Reconciliation of Heritage Conservation and Development: The Success of Criteria in Guiding the Design and Assessment of Contemporary Interventions in Historic Places.” International Journal of Architectural Research 9 (1): 77‒92. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.504.
   Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. 2016. “Distinguishing New Architecture from Old.” The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 7 (4): 321‒339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2016.1252492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosiński, J. 2015. “A Showcase of the Ideas and Implementations in the Field of Historical Conservation Design in the 21st Century, Based on a Selection of Examples.” Teka Komisji Urbanistyki I Architektury Pan Oddział W Krakowie XLIII:167‒194.
   Google Scholar
• Łakomy, K. 2019. “Villa Architecture in Katowice After 1914 (Problems of Conservation, Modernisation and the Architectural and Landscape Context).” Teka Komisji Urbanistyki I Architektury Pan Oddział W Krakowie XLVII:297‒311.
   Google Scholar
• Lindman, Å. E. 2010.“'Moderna Museet Malmö / Tham & Videgård Arkitekter.'“ https://www.archdaily.com/55428/moderna-museet-malmo-tham-videgard-arkitekter.
   Google Scholar
• Manifesto, S. P. A. B. 1877. “The Manifesto of the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings.” London. Retrieved from https://www.spab.org.uk/about-us/spab-manifesto.
   Google Scholar
• May, N., and N. Griffiths. 2015. “Planning Responsible Retrofit of Traditional Buildings.” In Sustainable Traditional Buildings Alliances. UK: Jenny Searle Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mehr, S. Y. 2019. “Analysis of 19th and 20th Century Conservation Key Theories in Relation to Contemporary Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings.” Heritage 2 (1): 920‒937. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010061.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhold, B. 2011, March 06). “The Wheeler School Student Center is a Green-Roofed Glass Gem.” INHABITAT. Retrieved from https://inhabitat.com/the-wheeler-school-student-center-is-a-green-roofed-glass-gem/.
   Google Scholar
• Navickiené, E. 2012. “Infill Architecture: Chasing Changes of Attitudes in Conservation of Urban Heritage.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development, Barcelos: GreenLines Institute, Porto, June 19‒22.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg-Schulz, C. 1979. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, S. 2018. Heritage conservation and the building crafts: a Yorkshire case study. PhD diss., University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlicki, B. M. 2015. “Differences in the Theory and Practice of the Preservation of Monuments and the Protection of Cultural Heritage Sites (100 Years of Zamość Protection).” Teka Komisji Urbanistyki I Architektury Pan Oddział W Krakowie XLIII:65‒81.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbarianyazd, R. 2017. “Sustainability in Historic Urban Environments: Effect of Gentrification in the Process of Sustainable Urban Revitalization.” Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 1 (1): 1‒9. https://doi.org/10.25034/1761.1(1)1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Riza, M., and N. Doratli. 2015. “The Critical Lacuna Between New Contextually Juxtaposed and Freestyle Buildings in Historic Settings.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 32 (3): 234‒257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodwell, D. 2003. “Sustainability and the Holistic Approach to the Conservation of Historic Cities.” Journal of Architectural Conservation 9 (1): 58‒73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2003.10785335.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. 1988. “Belief in the Future is Rooted in the Memory of the Past.” Royal Society of Arts Journal 136 (5388): 873‒884.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A. 1982. The Architecture of the City. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, C., and F. Koetter. 1978. Collage City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruskin, J. 1890. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. Orpington: George Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Sachner, P. M. 1987. “Hansen House, Wilmette, III.” Architectural Record 175 (5): 104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. 1988. “Residential Infill: A Fabric Design Strategy.” Architecture Australia 77 (1): 36‒39.
   Google Scholar
• Semary, Y. E., B. A. Kamel, and A. M. Amin. 2016. “'In Pursuit of Compatibility in Urban Context: An Analytical Study with Special References to Contemporary Local Contexts in Cairo.'” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 5 (10): 485‒494.
   Google Scholar
• Semes, S. W. 2007. “Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for New Construction in Historic Districts.” Philadelphia: Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Skerry, A. D. 2012. “Interpreting the standards: design professional and historicized design.” Master’s thesis, Roger Williams University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. F. 1975. “Conservation Myths: “Facadism” Used to Be a Dirty Word.” Built Environment 1 (1): 77‒80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43456949.
   Google Scholar
• Sotoudeh, H., and W. Abdullah. 2013. “Contextual Preferences of Experts and Residents: Issue of Replication and Differentiation for New Infill Design in Urban Historical Context.” World Applied Sciences Journal 21 (9): 1276‒1282.
   Google Scholar
• Stavreva, B. 2017. “New vs Old: New Architecture of Purpose in Old Settings.” Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Swensen, G. 2012. “Integration of Historic Fabric in New Urban Development—A Norwegian Case-Study.” Landscape and Urban Planning 107 (4): 380‒388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taher Tolou Del, M. S., B. Saleh Sedghpour, and S. Kamali Tabrizi. 2020. “The Semantic Conservation of Architectural Heritage: The Missing Values.” Heritage Science 8 (70): 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00416-w.
   Google Scholar
• Taraszkiewicz, L. 2002. “The Role of a Critic in the Dialogue Between History and the Present Day.” In MiastoHistoryczne w Dialogu ze Współczesnością, edited by J. Bogdanowski, 1–454. Gdańsk: Baltic Sea Cultural Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tawab, A. A. 2014. New Urban Development and the Historic Environment. Deutschland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tham and Videgard Architekter. 2010. “Tham & Videgård Moderna Museet Malmö.” Divisare Journal. https://divisare.com/projects/129616-Tham-Videg-rd-Arkitekter-Moderna-museet-Malm-.
   Google Scholar
• Tiedell, S., T. Oc, and T. Heath. 1996. Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toprak, G. K. 2020. “A Guideline Proposal for Determining Design Criteria of New Building Designs in Historical Cities: ICOMOS and UNESCO.” Social Science Development Journal 5 (22): 95‒116. https://doi.org/10.31567/ssd.284.
   Google Scholar
• Toprak, G. K., and S. Sahil. 2019. “International Agreements on Designing New Buildings in Historic Cities.” Journal of Science, PART B: Art, Humanities, Design and Planning 7 (4): 471‒477.
   Google Scholar
• Ukabi, E. 2016. “Harnessing the Tension from Context-Duality in Historic Urban Environment.” Journal of Sustainable Development 9 (1): 77‒87. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n1p77.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1968. “Meeting of Expert’s to Co-Ordinate, with a View to Their International Adoption, Principles and Scientific, Technical and Legal Criteria Applicable to the Protection of Cultural Property, Monuments and Sites.” Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/archive/1968/shc-cs-27-7e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1972. “Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.” Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1976. Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas. Nairobi. https://www.icomos.org/publications/93towns7o.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. “Vienna Memorandum on World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture–Managing the Historic Urban Landscape.” Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, World Heritage Centre. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-47-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2011. “The UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape.” UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/2365#. Accessed November 20, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., L. Smith, and G. Campbell. 2006. “The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies: The Burra Charter and Social Inclusion.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (4): 339‒355. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600727000.
   Google Scholar
• Węcławowicz-Gyurkovich, E. 2019. “Restored and New Market Halls in European Cities.” Teka Komisji Urbanistyki I Architektury Pan Oddział W Krakowie (Urbanity and Architecture Files) XLVII:51‒62.
   Google Scholar
• Yeomans, D. 1994. “Rehabilitation and Historic Preservation: A Comparison of British and American Approaches.” Town Planning Review 65 (2): 159‒178. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.65.2.28083u181mn1r121.
   Google Scholar
• Zonouz, H. K. 2018. “Partitioning (Facade) and Identity in the Historical Context Case of Zonouz City.” Journal of Sustainable Development 11 (6): 71‒81. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n6p70.
   Google Scholar