A comparative study of tag questions in four Asian Englishes from a corpus-based approach

References

• Anthony, L. (2011). AntConc (Version 3.2.4w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
   Google Scholar
• Algeo, J. (1988). The tag question in British English: It’s different I’n’it? English World-Wide, 9, 171–191.10.1075/eww.9.2
   Google Scholar
• Algeo, J. (1990). It’s a myth, innit? Politenss and the English tag question. In C. Ricks, & L. Michaels (Eds.), The state of the language (pp. 443–450). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Algeo, J. (2006). British or American English? A handbook of word and grammar patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607240
   Google Scholar
• Bautisa, M. L. S., Lising, J. L., & Dayag, D. T. (2004). The ICE-Philippines Corpus. Version 1. Retrived from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/download.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Borlongan, A. M. (2008). Tag questions in Philippine English. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 39. Retrieved from http://ejournals.ph/index.php?journal=PJL
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, P., & Bolton, K. (2006). The ICE-Hong Kong Corpus. Version 1. Retrieved from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/download.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R. M. (2004). Indian English: Syntax. In E. W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortman, R. Mesthrie, & C. Upton (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English: Vol. 2. Morphology and syntax (pp. 1016–1030). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2001). ‘She knows more about Hong Kong than you do isn’t it’: Tags in Hong Kong conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1419–1439.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00080-1
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. K. Y. (1995). Is it a tag question, isn’t it? The English Teacher, 14. Retrieved from http://www.melta.org/my/ET/1995/main5.html
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J. (1996). Women talk. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Columbus, G. (2010). A comparative analysis of invariant tags in three varieties of English. English World-Wide, 31, 288–310.10.1075/eww.31.3
   Google Scholar
• Gisborne, N. (2009). Aspects of the morphosyntactic typology of Hong Kong English. English World-Wide, 30, 149–169.10.1075/eww.30.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Honna, N. (2008). English as a multicultural language is Asian contexts: Issues and ideas. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (2009). World Englishes: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2009). The Karmic cycle of world Englishes: Some futuristic constructs. World Englishes, 28 (1), 1–14.10.1111/weng.2009.28.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (ed.). (1992) The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. B., & Ann, J. Y. (2008). English tag questions: Corpus findings and theoretical implications. English Language and Linguistics, 25, 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kimps, D. (2007). Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 270–291.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimps, D., & Davidse, K. (2008). Illocutionary force and conduciveness in imperative constant polarity tag questions: A typology. Text & Talk, 28, 699–722.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L., & Gisborne, N. (2009). The typology of Asian Englishes: Setting the agenda. English World-Wide, 30, 123–132.10.1075/eww.30.2
   Google Scholar
• Násslin, S. (1984). The English tag question: A study of sentences containing tags of the type ISN’T IT? IS IT? Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. (1996). The design of the corpus. In S. Greenbaum (Ed.), Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English (pp. 27–35). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselhauf, N. (2009). Co-selectional phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and differences) to foreign learner varieties. English World-Wide, 30 (1), 1–26.10.1075/eww.30.1
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Columbus, G. (2010). The ICE-Canada Corpus. Version 1. Retrieved from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/download.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nihilani, P., Yibin, N., Pakir, A., & Ooi, V. (2002). The ICE-Singapore Corpus. Version 1. Retrieved from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/download.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mahboob, A. (2004). Pakistani English: Morphology and syntax. In E. W. Schneider, K. Burridge, B. Kortman, R. Mesthrie, & C. Upton (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English: Vol. 2. Morphology and syntax (pp. 1045–1057). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, W. (1995). The English ‘tag question’: A new analysis, is(n’t) it? In R. Hasan & P. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. 91–121). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, J., & Gries, S. T. (2009). Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-constructional associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide, 30, 27–51.10.1075/eww.30.1
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. R. (1985). Negation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 1. Clause structure (pp. 197–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Razali, N. (1995). Tagging it the Malaysian style. The English Teacher, 14. Retrieved from http://www.melta.org/my/ET/1995/main5.html
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. W. (2003). The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language, 79, 233–281.10.1353/lan.2003.0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlatschek, A. (2009). Contemporary Indian English: Variation and change. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/veaw.g38
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, D. (2009). Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide, 30, 170–195.10.1075/eww.30.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shastri, S. V., & Leitner, G. (2002). The ICE-India Corpus. Version 1. Retrieved from http://ice-corpora.net/ice/download.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, H. J. (2007). Grammatical features of Singapore colloquial English: A corpus-based variation study. ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/
   Google Scholar
• Stenström, A.-B. (1997). Tags in teenage talk. In U. Fries, V. Müller, & P. Schneider (Eds.), From AElfric to the New York Times (pp. 139–147). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 34, 283–311.10.1177/0075424206294369
   Google Scholar
• Wong, M. L.-Y. (2007). Tag questions in Hong Kong English: A corpus-based study. Asian Englishes, 10, 44–61.10.1080/13488678.2007.10801199
   Google Scholar
• Zhiming, B., & Huaqing, H. (2006). Diglossia and register variation in Singapore English. World Englishes, 25, 105–114.10.1111/weng.2006.25.issue-1
   Google Scholar