On language, culture, and controversies

References

• Archer, M. (2005). Structure, culture and agency. In M. D. Jacobs & N. W. Hanrahan (Eds.), The Blackwell companions to the sociology of culture (pp. 17–34). London: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. R., Faulkner, S. L., Hecht, M. L., & Lindsley, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Redefining culture: Perspectives across the disciplines. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B., & Sealey, A. (2000). Language, structure and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4–1, 3–20.10.1111/1467-9481.00100
   Google Scholar
• Carter, B., & Sealey, A. (2004). Researching ‘real’ language. In B. Carter & C. New (Eds.), Making realism work: Realist social theory and empirical research (pp. 11–130). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N., Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N. (Eds.). (2001). Sociolinguistics and social theory. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Deters, P., Gao, X., Miller, E. R., & Vitanova, G. (2015). Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. J. (2014). Debate: Seven ways to be a realist about language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44–3, 249–267.10.1111/jtsb.2014.44.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipović, J. (2015). Transdisciplinary approach to language study: The complexity theory perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137538468
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. A. (1978). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Honna, N. (2012). The pedagogical implications of English as a multicultural lingua franca. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1, 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitudes and identity. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kato, S., & Tanahashi, S. (2013). A study on English as a lingua franca: Japanese university students’ barriers to communication. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 300–305.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D. (1997). Modern social theory: Key debates and new directions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McCay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and perspectives. New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. (2014). The self from a complexity perspective. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 160–176). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2004). Applied linguistics as social science. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2014). Response to Elder-Vass: “Seven ways to be a realist about language”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44–3, 268–281.10.1111/jtsb.2014.44.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidlhofer, B. (Ed.). (2003). Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agenda and new approaches. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387962
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, A. (2011). Introducing diversity into ELT: Student teachers’ responses. ELT Journal, 65, 145–153.10.1093/elt/ccq024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, Y. (2009). English as an international lingua franca: From societal to individual. World Englishes, 28, 246–255.10.1111/weng.2009.28.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar