Does Philippine English subject–verb agreement exist in academic writing? The case of research articles across disciplines

References

• Asian EFL Journal. (2021). Submission guidelines. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, M. L. S. (2000). Defining standard Philippine English: Its status and grammatical features. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, M. L. S. (2001). Attitudes of English language faculty in three leading universities towards Philippine English. Asian Englishes, 4(1), 4–32. doi:10.1080/13488678.2001.10801062
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, M. L. S. (2008). Investigating the grammatical features of Philippine English. In M. L. S. Bautista & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 201–218). Aberdeen, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, M. L. S., & Gonzalez, A. (2006). Southeast Asian Englishes. In B. B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & C. L. NelsonEds., The handbook of world Englishes (pp. 130–144). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1111/b.9781405111850.2006.00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, A. S. (2023). Language teaching. In A. M. Borlongan (Ed.), Philippine English: Development, structure, and sociology of English in the Philippines (pp. 283–296). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, A. S., & Madrunio, M. R. (2015). A framework for designing a Philippine-English-based pedagogic model for teaching English grammar. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 3, 43–71.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511920776
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Contrasting the grammatical complexities of conversation and academic writing: Implications for EAP writing development and teaching. LIF – Language in Focus Journal, 2(1), 1–18. doi:10.1515/lifijsal-2016-0001
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/z.232
   Google Scholar
• Borlongan, A. M. (2007). Innovations in standard Philippine English. In C. C. Mann (Ed.), Current research on English and applied linguistics: A De La Salle University special issue (pp. 1–36). Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University-Manila, College of Education, Department of English and Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Borlongan, A. M. (2016). Relocating Philippine English in Schneider’s dynamic model. Asian Englishes, 18(3), 232–241. doi:10.1080/13488678.2016.1223067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borlongan, A. M. (Ed.). (2023). Philippine English: Development, structure, and sociology of English in the Philippines. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003). Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 223–243. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teachers’ course (2nd ed.). United States of America: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. (2011). Variable agreement in the existential there-construction in Philippine English. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine component of the international Corpus of English (pp. 175–186). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P., Yao, X., & Borlongan, A. M. (2014). Relative clauses in Philippine English: A diachronic perspective. In L. Vandelanotte, K. Davidse, C. Gentens, & D. Kimps (Eds.), ), Recent advances in corpus linguistics: Developing and exploiting corpora (pp. 125–146). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Higher Education. (2009). National higher education research agenda 2 (2009-2018) (NHERA 2). Commission on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NHERA-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coronel, L. M. (2011). Patterns of intensifier usage in Philippine English. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine component of the international Corpus of English (pp. 93–116). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dayag, D. T. (2014). Preposition stranding and pied-piping in Philippine English: A corpus-based study. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim, & H. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia: The future of English as a global language (pp. 102–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dita, S. N. (2011). The grammar and semantics of disjuncts in Philippine English. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine component of the International Corpus of English (pp. 33–50). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza, J. (1998). Review of Arjuna Parakram’s de-hegemonizing language standards: Learning from (post)colonial Englishes about “English”. Asian Englishes, 1(2), 86–94. doi:10.1080/13488678.1999.10801011
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, W. D. W., & Dita, S. N. (2017). English language teachers’ perceptions of world Englishes: The elephants in the room. Asian Englishes, 19(3), 242–258. doi:10.1080/13488678.2017.1362782
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. (1997). Philippine English: A variety in search of legitimacy. In E. W. Schneider (Ed.), Englishes around the world: Studies in honor of Manfred Görlach. Volume 2: Caribbean, Africa, Asia, Australasia (pp. 205–212). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. B. (1983). When does an error become a feature of Philippine English? In R. B. Noss (Ed.), Varieties of English in Southeast Asia (pp. 150–172). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. B. (1985). Studies on Philippine English. In Occasional papers no. 39. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. B., Jambalos, T. V., & Romero, M. S. C. (2003). Three studies on Philippine English across generations: Towards an integration and some implications. Manila, Philippines: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gustilo, L. E. (2010). “Although if is more frequent than whether…”: An analysis of the uses of adverbial clauses in Philippine English research articles. Philippine ESL Journal, 4, 24–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, H. P. (2021). Syntactic description of research articles across disciplines. [ Doctoral dissertation, Philippine Normal University–Manila].
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, H. P. (2022). Philippine English and teaching it: Awareness and attitudes of grassroots Filipino English language teachers. In M. S. Khine & Y. Liu (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 293–312). Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hundt, M. (2011). The committee has/have decided … on concord patterns with collective nouns in inner- and outer-circle varieties of English. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine component of the International Corpus of English (pp. 117–144). Mandaluying City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17–45). Frankfort: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hynninen, N., & Kuteeva, M. (2017). “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 53–65. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk, H. G. Widdowson, & Y. Cant`u (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1997). English as an Asian language. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.), English is an Asian language: The Philippine context (pp. 1–23). Sydney, Australia: The Macquarie Library Pty., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., Celce-Murcia, M., Frodesen, J., White, B., & Williams, H. (2016). The grammar book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers (3rd ed.). Boston: MA: National Geographic Learning, Heinle Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Llamzon, T. A. (1969). Standard Filipino English. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahboob, A. (2018). Beyond global Englishes: Teaching English as a dynamic language. RELC Journal, 49(1), 36–57. doi:10.1177/0033688218754944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I. P. (2014). Philippine English revisited. World Englishes, 33(1), 50–59. doi:10.1111/weng.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I. P. (2021). Periphery English language teaching: Myths about English in the Philippines. In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of world Englishes (2nd ed.) (pp. 281–297). New Tork, NY: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003128755-19
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, T. (1992). English. In T. McArthur (Ed.), The Oxford companion of the English language (pp. 352–357). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesthrie, R., & Bhatt, R. M. (2008). World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. F. (2002). English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. (2010). Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In A. O’Keefe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 53–65). New York: NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. W. (2017). Models of English in the world. In J. Klemola, M. Filppula, & D. Sharma (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of world Englishes (pp. 32–45). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Enk, A., & Power, K. (2017). What is a research article? Genre variability and data selection in genre research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2017.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar