The OMC – a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensionsFootnote¹

For helpful comments on previous drafts of this paper, we would like to thank Jean-Claude Barbier, Kerstin Jacobsson, Stephan Leibfried, David Natali, Martin Rhodes, Philippe Pochet, Stijn Smismans and David Trubek. We thank Lorraine Frisina, Kristina Frels and Saime Özcürümez for help with editing the English text. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

• Barbier C 2003 ‘Final amendments to the Convention’ Tomorrow Europe Newsletter of the Observatoire Social Européen, July
   Google Scholar
• Barbier C et al. 2002 ‘European briefing’ Journal of European Social Policy 12 4 347 57
   Google Scholar
• Barbier J-C Samba Sylla N 2001 ‘Stratégie européenne pour l’emploi: les représentations des acteurs en France’ Rapport pour la DARES et la Délégation à l’emploi du ministère du travail et de l’emploi, December
   Google Scholar
• Borras , S and Jacobsson , K . 2004 . ‘The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU’ . Journal of European Public Policy , 11 ( 2 ) : 185 – 208 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechs M Friedrich D 2004 ‘Surface integration – the national action plans for employment and social inclusion in Germany’, in J. Zeitlin, P. Pochet and L. Magnusson (eds), Opening the Open Method of Co-ordination Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2001a ‘European Governance: a White Paper’ COM (2001) 428 final of 25 July 2001 (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2001b Communication from the Commission ‘Supporting national strategies for safe and sustainable pensions through an integrated approach’ COM (2001) 362 of 3 July 2001 (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0362en01.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2002a ‘Pensions/frequently asked questions’ MEMO/02/298, Brussels, 17 December 2002 (http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/news/2002/dec/memo_2_298_en.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2002b Communication from the Commission ‘Taking stock of five years of the European Employment Strategy’ COM (2002) 416 of 17 July 2002 (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2002/com2002_0416en01.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2002c 2002 Impact Evaluation (EES) http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/employment_strategy/impact_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2002d Communication from the Commission on streamlining the annual economic and employment policy co-ordination cycles COM (2002) 487 of 3 September 2002 (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/rpt/2002/com2002_0487en01.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• CEC 2003 ‘The future of the European Employment Strategy (EES): A strategy for full employment and better jobs for all’ COM (2003) 6 final of 14 January 2003
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J 1996 ‘Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 103 32
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J Sabel C 2003 ‘Sovereignty and solidarity: EU and US’, in J. Zeitlin and D. Trubek (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union 2000 ‘The on-going experience of the open method of co-ordination’ Presidency Note, No. 9088/00, 13 June
   Google Scholar
• De Búrca G Zeitlin J 2003 ‘Constitutionalising the open method of co-ordination – what should the Convention propose?’ CEPS Policy Brief, No. 31, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, March
   Google Scholar
• De la Porte C 2003 ‘How relevant is the pensions OMC to the reform of pension systems in EU member states?’, in C. Degryse and P. Pochet (eds), Social Developments in the European Union 2002 Brussels: European Trade Union Institute, Observatoire Social Européen and Saltsa 253 77
   Google Scholar
• De la Porte C Pochet P 2002 ‘Public pension reform: European actors, discourses and outcomes’, in C. de la Porte and P. Pochet (eds), Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co-ordination Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang 223 50
   Google Scholar
• Dehousse R 2003 La Méthode ouverte de co-ordination: convergence et politiques dans l’UE Paris: L’Harmattan
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein B Kerwer D 2002 ‘Theorising the new modes of European Union governance’ European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 6 5 April (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002–005a.htm)
   Google Scholar
• European Council 2000 Lisbon European Council Presidency Conclusions 23–24 March
   Google Scholar
• European Industrial Relations On-line 2002 National social partner involvement in the 2002 NAP (http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/), European Foundation of Living and Working Conditions
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament 2003 Report on analysis of the open co-ordination procedure in the field of employment and social affairs, and future prospects by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur Miet Smets A5-0143/2003 of 30 April
   Google Scholar
• Everson M. 1999 . ‘Review essay: A German cornucopia’ . European Law Journal , 5 ( 2 ) : 141 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• Gerstenberg O Sabel CF 2002 ‘Directly-deliberative polyarchy: an institutional ideal for Europe?’, in C. Joerges and R. Dehousse (eds), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market Oxford: Oxford University Press 289 342
   Google Scholar
• Goetschy J 2003 ‘The European Employment Strategy, multi-level governance and policy co-ordination: past, present and future’, in J. Zeitlin and D. Trubek (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Gutman A Thompson D 1996 Democracy and Deliberation Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Habermas J 1996 Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson K 2004 ‘Trying to reform the best pupils in the class? The OMC in Sweden and Denmark’, in J. Zeitlin, P. Pochet and L. Magnusson (eds), Opening the Open Method of Co-ordination Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson K Vifell A 2003 ‘Integration by deliberation? On the role of committees in the open method of co-ordination’ Prepared for the workshop on The Forging of Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU, EUI, Florence, 7–8 February
   Google Scholar
• Joerges C 1999 ‘“Good governance” through comitology?’, in C. Joerges and E. Vos (eds), 1999 EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics Oxford: Hart Publishing 311 38
   Google Scholar
• Joerges C Everson M 2004 ‘Law, economics and politics in the constitutionalization of Europe’, in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and J. Menéndez (eds), Developing a Constitution for Europe London: Routledge (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• Joerges , C and Neyer , J . 1997 . ‘Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector’ . Journal of European Public Policy , 4 ( 4 ) : 609 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer C 2003 ‘Towards a Europeanization of socio-economic discourses? A study of quality press coverage of economic policy co-ordination since Amsterdam’ Contribution to the EUROPUB Conference Europeanization of Public Spheres? Political Mobilization, Public Communication, and the European Union, 20–22 June
   Google Scholar
• Nanz P 2003 ‘Les voix multiples de l’Europe. Une idée interdiscursive de la sphere publique’ Raisons politiques: etudes de pensee politique, Paris: Presse de Sciences Po
   Google Scholar
• Nanz P Steffek J 2004 ‘Global governance, participation and the public sphere’, in D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds), Global Governance and Public Accountability special issue I of Government and Opposition
   Google Scholar
• Pochet P 2003 ‘OMC: a way to improve democratic Europe or to Europeanize social rights?’ Prepared for the 8th EUSA conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 27–30 March
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M.J. 2001 ‘The open method of co-ordination as a new governance tool’ Europa Europe Special Issue, No. 2–3 Fondazione Istituto Gramsci, Rome 96 107
   Google Scholar
• Telò M 2002 ‘Governance and government in the European Union. The open method of co-ordination’, in M.J. Rodrigues (ed.), The New Knowledge Economy in Europe – A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 242 72
   Google Scholar
• Trubek D Mosher J 2003 ‘New governance, employment policy and the European social model’, in J. Zeitlin and D. Trubek (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke F 2003 ‘Social Europe’ Intervention at the Expert Hearing of the European Convention, Working Group XI, Brussels, 21 January
   Google Scholar