The EU regulatory trade agenda and the quest for WTO enforcement

References

• Abbott , F. M. and Gerber , D. 1997 . Public Policy and Global Technological Integration , London/The Hague/Boston : Kluwer Law International .
   Google Scholar
• Abbott , K. W. , Keohane , R. O. , Moravcsik , A. , Slaughter , A. and Snidal , D. 2000 . The concept of legalization . International Organization , 54 ( 3 ) : 401 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin , M. 2006 . EU trade politics – heaven or hell? . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 928 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Brack , D. and Gray , K. 2003 . Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the WTO , London : The Royal Institute of International Affairs .
   Google Scholar
• Brenton , P. 2003 . Integrating the Least Developed Countries into the World Trading System: The Current Impact of EU Preferences under Everything But Arms , Washington, DC : World Bank Policy Paper . http://www.worldbank.org/research/trade/pdf/everything_but_arms.pdf; last accessed 23 February 2006
   Google Scholar
• Croome , J. 1999 . Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round , Geneva : World Trade Organization .
   Google Scholar
• Damro , C. 2004 . Multilateral competition policy and transatlantic compromise . European Foreign Affairs Review , 9 ( 2 ) : 269 – 87 .
   Google Scholar
• Damro , C. 2006 . The new trade politics and EU competition policy: shopping for convergence and co-operation . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 863 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , C. L. 2004 . International institutions and issue linkage: building support for agricultural trade liberalization . American Political Science Review , 98 ( 1 ) : 153 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bièvre , D. 2006 . “ Legislative and judicial decision making in the World Trade Organization ” . In New Modes of Governance in the Global System. Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness , Edited by: Koenig-Archibugi , M. and Zürn , M. 31 – 51 . Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• De Bièvre , D. and Dür , A. 2005 . Constituency interests and delegation in European and American trade policy . Comparative Political Studies , 38 ( 10 ) : 1271 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch , K. G. 2001 . “ The EU: contending for leadership ” . In The World Trade Organization Millennium Round. Freer Trade in the Twenty-First Century , Edited by: Deutsch , K. G. and Speyer , B. 34 – 47 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Dür , A. forthcoming 2007 . “ Avoiding deadlock in European trade policy: veto players and issue linkages ” . In Yet It Moves: Dynamics in European Governance , Edited by: De Bièvre , D. and Neuhold , C. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar .
   Google Scholar
• Dür , A. and De Biévre , D. forthcoming 2007 . Inclusion without influence? Civil society involvement in European Trade Policy . Journal of Public Policy ,
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trust . 2003 . Expanding WTO Rules? Should There be WTO Rules on Competition, Investment, Trade Facilitation and Transparency in Government Procurement? A Federal Trust Report on the Singapore Issues , available at http://www.fedtrust.co.uk/admin/uploads/FedT%20-%20Sing%20Issues%20Report.pdf; last accessed 23 February 2006
   Google Scholar
• Frieden , J. and Rogowski , R. 1996 . “ The impact of the international economy on national policies: an analytical overview ” . In Internationalization and Domestic Politics , Edited by: Keohane , R. O. and Milner , H. V. 25 – 47 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• GATT . (July) 1990 . “ Improvements to the GATT dispute settlement rules and procedures, decision of 12 April 1989 (L/6489) ” . In The Contracting Parties to the GATT, Basic Instruments and Selected Documents, Thirty-sixth Supplement. Protocols, Decisions, Reports 1988–1989 and Forty-fifth Session , (July) , 61 – 7 . Geneva : General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade .
   Google Scholar
• Gehring , T. 2002 . “ Schutzstandards in der WTO? Die schleichende Verknüpfung der Welthandelsordnung mit standardsetzenden internationalen Institutionen ” . In Regieren in internationalen Institutionen , Edited by: Jachtenfuchs , M. and Knodt , M. 111 – 39 . Opladen : Leske + Budrich .
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein , J. L. and Martin , L. L. 2000 . Legalization, trade liberalization, and domestic politics: a cautionary note . International Organization , 54 ( 3 ) : 603 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber , L. 2000 . Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gstöhl , S. and Kaiser , R. 2004 . “ Mechanisms of global trade governance: the “double standard” on standards in the WTO ” . In New Rules for Global Markets: Public and Private Governance in the World Economy , Edited by: Schirm , S. 195 – 213 . Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman , B. M. and Kostecki , M. M. 2001 . The Political Economy of the World Trading System, , 2nd edn , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Holmes , P. 2006 . Trade and “domestic” policies: the European mix . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 811 – 27 .
   Google Scholar
• Hudec , R. E. 2000 . Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law , London : Cameron May .
   Google Scholar
• ICC . 2003 . Competition Policy in the WTO: Doha Declaration Issues , Paris : International Chamber of Commerce . Policy Statement, available at http://www.iccwbo.org/home/statements_rules/statements/2003/Competition_policy_in_the_WTO.asp; last accessed 15 December 2005
   Google Scholar
• ICSID . 2003 . Convention, Regulations and Rules , Washington, DC : International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes . ICSID/15/Rev. 1
   Google Scholar
• Keohane , R. O. and Nye , J. 2001 . Between Centralization and Fragmentation: The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy , JFK School of Government, Harvard University . Research Working Paper 01–004
   Google Scholar
• Kerremans , B. 2004 . What went wrong in Cancun? A principal–agent view on the EU's rationale towards the Doha Development Round . European Foreign Affairs Review , 9 ( 3 ) : 363 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Lamy , P. 2004 . What Next for EU Trade Policy? , Berlin : Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik . 11 June 2004
   Google Scholar
• List , M. and Zangl , B. 2003 . “ Verrechtlichung internationaler Politik ” . In Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland , Edited by: Hellmann , G. , Wolf , K. D. and Zürn , M. 361 – 99 . Baden-Baden : Nomos .
   Google Scholar
• Majone , G. 1996 . Regulating Europe , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Martin , L. 1994 . Heterogeneity, linkage and common problems . Journal of Theoretical Politics , 6 ( 4 ) : 473 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskus , K. E. 2002 . Regulatory standards in the WTO: comparing intellectual property rights with competition policy, environmental protection, and core labor standards . World Trade Review , 1 ( 2 ) : 135 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Mattila , M. 2004 . Contested decisions: empirical analysis of voting in the European Union Council of Ministers . European Journal of Political Research , 43 ( 1 ) : 29 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier , S. 2005 . Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Meunier , S. and Nicolaïdis , K. 2006 . The European Union as a conflicted trade power . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 902 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Palmeter , D. and Mavroidis , P. C. 1999 . Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure , The Hague and Boston : Kluwer Law International .
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf , F. W. 1999 . Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer , G. 2003 . Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation , Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer , G. 2006 . What's new in EU trade dispute settlement? Judicialization, public–private networks and the WTO legal order . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 828 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , J. M. 2000 . The politics of dispute settlement design: explaining legalism in regional trade pacts . International Organization , 54 ( 1 ) : 137 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg , R. 2002 . In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO . International Organization , 56 ( 2 ) : 339 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet , A. 1999 . Judicialization and the construction of governance . Comparative Political Studies , 32 ( 2 ) : 147 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen , J. 1954 . International Economic Integration , Amsterdam : North Holland .
   Google Scholar
• Walter , A. 2001 . “ Unravelling the Faustian bargain: non-state actors and the multilateral agreement on investment ” . In Non-state Actors in World Politics , Edited by: Josselin , D. and Wallace , W. 150 – 68 . Basingstoke : Palgrave .
   Google Scholar
• Weiler , J. H.H. 2000 . The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement , Cambridge, MA : Harvard Law School . Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 09/00
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock , S. undated . The Singapore Issues in Cancun: A Failed Negotiation Ploy or a Litmus Test for Global Governance? , Manuscript, available at http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/internationalTradePolicyUnit/pdf/theSingaporeIssuesInCancunRev1.pdf; last accessed 7 February 2006
   Google Scholar
• WTO . 1995 . The Legal Texts. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Young , A. R. forthcoming . “ Negotiating with diminished expectations: the EU in the DDA ” . In Endgame at the WTO: Reflections on the Doha Development Round , Edited by: Lee , D. and Wilkinson , R. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Young , A. R. and Peterson , J. 2006 . The EU and the new trade politics . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 6 ) : 791 – 810 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young , A. R. , Holmes , P. and Rollo , J. 2000 . The European Trade Agenda after Seattle, SEI Working Paper No. 37 , Brighton : Sussex European Institute .
   Google Scholar