The state of the discipline: authorship, research designs, and citation patterns in studies of EU interest groups and lobbying

REFERENCES

• Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P. and Tinkler, J. (2014) The Impact of Social Science. How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. (2007) ‘EU lobbying: a view from the US’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 482–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B. (1998) Basic Interests. The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2008) ‘Counting organized interests in the European Union: a comparison of data sources’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 489–513.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. (2008a) ‘Researching interest groups politics in Europe and elsewhere: much we study, little we know?’, West European Politics 31(6): 1103–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. (2008b) ‘Conclusion: embedding interest groups research’, West European Politics 31(6): 1292–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2002) ‘Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 365–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bunea, A. (2013) ‘Issues, preferences and ties: determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(4): 552–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D. (2007) ‘Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 333–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D. and Richardson, J. (eds) (2009) Lobbying the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. and Katsaitis, A. (2013) ‘Chameleon pluralism in the EU: an empirical study of the European Commission interest groups density and diversity across policy domains’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(8): 1104–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V. and Valentine, J.C. (eds) (2009) The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. (2008) ‘Measuring interest group influence in the EU: a note on methodology’, European Union Politics 9(4): 559–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. (2008) ‘Interest group in EU policymaking’, Living Reviews in European Governance 3(4), doi: 10.12942/lreg-2008-4.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. (2007) Interest Representation in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. and Aspinwall, M. (1998) Collective Action in the European Union: Interests and the New Politics of Associability, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2004) ‘A global ranking of political science departments’, Political Studies Review 2: 293–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C., Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M. and Leech, B.L. (2012) ‘Studying organizational advocacy and influence: re-examining interest groups research’, Annual Review of Political Science 15(9): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.D. and Kristensen, P.M. (2013) ‘The elephant in the room: mapping the latent communication pattern in European Union studies’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler, J.T.S. (2005) ‘Mapping EU studies: the evolution from boutique to boom field 1960–2001’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(3): 551–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2009) ‘Measuring interest group influence using quantitative text analysis’, European Union Politics 10(4): 535–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2013) Lobbying in the European Union. Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions and Policy Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, P.M. (2012) ‘Dividing discipline: structures of communication in International Relations’, International Studies Review 14: 32–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (2005) ‘Similarity measures, author co-citation analysis, and information theory’, Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology 56: 769–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. and Brasher, H. (2004) Organized Interests and American Government, Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels versus the Beltway. Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. and Baumgartner, F. (2008) ‘Converging perspectives on interest groups research in EU and the US’, West European Politics 31(6): 1253–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., Power, R. and Walter, B.F. (2013) ‘The gender citation gap in International Relations’, International Organization 67(4): 889–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazey, S. and Richardson, J. (eds) (1993) Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J. (2010) Networks. An Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2000) Social Network Analysis. A Handbook. 2nd edn, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Stokman, F.N., Achen, C.H. and König, T. (2006) The European Union Decides, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar