Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation

REFERENCES

• Angelova, M., Dannwolf, T. and König, T. (2012) ‘How robust are compliance findings? A research synthesis’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(8): 1269–91. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.705051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2012) ‘From Europeanisation to diffusion: introduction’, West European Politics 35(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lucia, L. and Kronsell, A. (2010) ‘The willing, the unwilling and the unable – explaining implementation of the EU Biofuels Directive’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(4): 545–63. doi: 10.1080/13501761003673559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. (2000) ‘National adaptation to European integration: the importance of institutional veto points’, Journal of Public Policy 20(1): 83–103. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00000763
   Google Scholar
• Jans, J.H., Squintani, L., Aragão, A., Macrory, R. and Wegener, B.W. (2009) ‘“Gold plating” of European environmental measures?’, Journal of European Environmental Planning Law 6(4): 417–35. doi: 10.1163/161372709X12608898676797
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002) ‘The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: three Europeanization mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research 41(2): 255–80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. (1998) ‘Coping with Europe: the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(4): 595–614. doi: 10.1080/13501769880000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. (2003) ‘Modes of regulation in the governance of the European Union: towards a comprehensive evaluation’, European Integration online Papers 7(2003-001), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-001.htm, accessed 2 February 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Schulze, K. and Tosun, J. (2012) ‘Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: exploring a complex relationship’, Regulation and Governance 6(4): 427–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1999) ‘Regulation in comparative perspective’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 1(3): 309–24.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1998) ‘The institutional dynamics of international political orders’, International Organization 52(4): 943–69. doi: 10.1162/002081898550699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E. (2005) ‘EU compliance: still a “black hole”?’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 1103–20. doi: 10.1080/13501760500270869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E. and Kaeding, M. (2006) ‘Europeanization beyond the goodness of fit: domestic politics in the forefront’, Comparative European Politics 4(4): 331–54. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110078
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R.K.A. (2011) ‘The application of the Habitats Directive in the UK: compliance or gold plating?’, Land Use Policy 28(1): 361–9. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. and Neumayer, E. (2007) ‘Implementing multilateral environmental agreements: an analysis of EU Directives’, Global Environmental Politics 7(3): 13–41. doi: 10.1162/glep.2007.7.3.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pülzl, H. and Treib, O. (2007) ‘Implementing public policy’, in F. Fischer, G.J. Miller and M.S. Sidney (eds), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, pp. 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. (eds) (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, F. (2009) ‘Governance and coercion’, Political Studies 57(3): 537–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00743.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, F., Thomann, E., Zollinger, C. and Mavrot, C. (2011) ‘Tierarzneimittelregulierung in Europa’, Study mandated by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Bern: Centre of Competence for Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, F., Thomann, E., Zollinger, C. and Mavrot, C. (2014) ‘Confronting theories of European integration: a comparative congruence analysis of veterinary drugs regulations in five countries’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16(5): 457–74. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.960244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (2008) ‘Beyond compliance: the Europeanization of member states through negative integration and legal uncertainty’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10(3): 299–308. doi: 10.1080/13876980802231016
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. (2007) ‘A policy solution to the European Union's transposition puzzle: interaction of interests in different domestic arenas’, West European Politics 30(1): 23–49. doi: 10.1080/01402380601019639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steunenberg, B. and Toshkov, D. (2009) ‘Comparing transposition in the 27 member states of the EU: the impact of discretion and legal fit’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(7): 951–70. doi: 10.1080/13501760903226625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töller, A.E. (2010) ‘Measuring and comparing the Europeanization of national legislation: a research note’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48(2): 417–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2010) ‘Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law’, Working paper No. 01/2010, Institute for European Integration Research.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O. (2014) ‘Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs’, Living Reviews in European Governance 9(1): 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O., Bähr, H. and Falkner, G. (2007) ‘Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/135017606061071406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1995) ‘Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism’, British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289–325. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (1998) ‘Policy instruments: typologies and theories’, in M. Bemelmans-Videc, R.C. Rist and E. Vedung (eds), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation, New Brunswick: Transaction, pp. 21–58.
   Google Scholar
• Versluis, E. (2003) Enforcement Matters. Enforcement and Compliance of European Directives in Four Member States, Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Voermans, W. (2009) ‘Gold-plating and double banking: an overrated problem?’, in H. Snijders and S. Vogenauer (eds), Content and Meaning of National Law in the Context of Transnational Law, Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, pp. 79–88.
   Google Scholar