Explaining the variation in the Europeanization of business: an institutionalist theory

References

• Alt, J.E., Carlsen, F., Heum, P. and Johansen, K. (1999) ‘Asset specificity and the political behaviour of firms: lobbying for subsidies in Norway’, International Organization 53(1): 99–116. doi: 10.1162/002081899550823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, S., Hirschman, A. and Maier, C. (1983) Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P. and Mitchell, N.J. (2009) ‘The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the European Union’, European Union Politics 10(2): 155–76. doi: 10.1177/1465116509103366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. (2002) ‘Gaining and seeking access: the European adaptation of domestic interest associations’, European Journal of Political Research 41(5): 585–612. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. and Kerremans, B. (2007) ‘Critical resource dependencies and the Europeanization of domestic interest groups’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 460–81. doi: 10.1080/13501760701243822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. and Kerremans, B. (2012) ‘Domestic embeddedness and the dynamics of multilevel venue shopping in four EU member states’, Governance 25(2): 263–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe’, in K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2002) ‘Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 365–90. doi: 10.1080/13501760210138796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2004) ‘Exchanging access goods for access: a comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions’, European Journal of Political Research 43(3): 337–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broscheid, A. and Coen, D. (2003) ‘Insider and outsider lobbying of the European Commission: an informational model of forum politics’, European Union Politics 4(2): 165–89. doi: 10.1177/1465116503004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broscheid, A. and Coen, D. (2007) ‘Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: empirically exploring the nature of the policy good’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 346–65. doi: 10.1080/13501760701243749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, M. (2000) Federalism and European Union: The Building of Europe, 1950–2000, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BvD, B.V.D. (2013) AMADEUS, available at http://www.bvdinfo.com, accessed February 2012.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010) ‘Framework for Commission expert groups: horizontal rules and public register’, COM(2010) 7649, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2012a) ‘Joint transparency register’, available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/info/homePage.do, accessed January 2012.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2012b) ‘Register of the Commission expert groups and other similar entities’, Available at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/, accessed January 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A.W. (2011) ‘Interests, influence and information: comparing the influence of interest groups in the European Union’, Journal of European Integration 33(4): 471–86. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2011.579751
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. (2007a) ‘Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 333–45. doi: 10.1080/13501760701243731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D. (2007b) ‘Lobbying in the European Union’, PE 393.266, Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. (2009) ‘Business lobbying in the European Union’, in D. Coen and J. Richardson (ed.), Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors and Issues, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–68.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. and Dannreuther, C. (2003) ‘Differentiated Europeanization: large and small firms in the EU policy process’, in K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–75.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. and Grant, W. (2000) ‘Corporate political strategy and global policy: a case study of the transatlantic business dialogue’, European Business Journal 13(1): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. and Katsaitis, A. (2013) ‘Chameleon pluralism in the EU: an empirical study of the European Commission interest group density and diversity across policy domains’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(8): 1104–19. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.781785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowles, M. (2001) ‘The transatlantic business dialogue and domestic business–government relations’, in M.G. Cowles, J.A. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 159–79.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. and Furlong, P. (1997) ‘Cross-border trade and contract awards. The intellectual myopia at the heart of the EU procurement rules’, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 3(1): 9–20. doi: 10.1016/S0969-7012(96)00008-1
   Google Scholar
• EA (2006) 75 Energy Associations, Companies, Consultancies and Institutions, Brussels: Helios Media sprl.
   Google Scholar
• EA (2007) 180 Company Representations in Brussels, Brussels: Helios Media sprl.
   Google Scholar
• EA (2008a) 93 Transport Associations, Companies and Institutions, Brussels: Helios Media sprl.
   Google Scholar
• EA (2008b) 156 IT and Telecommunication Associations, Companies and Institutions, Brussels: Helios Media sprl.
   Google Scholar
• Eising, R. (2007) ‘Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices explaining interest group access in the European Union’, European Union Politics 8(3): 329–62. doi: 10.1177/1465116507079542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. (2010) Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe are Becoming Similar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. and Mitchell, P. (2005) The Politics of Electoral Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, M. (1997) ‘Lobbying as a private good with intra-industry trade’, International Studies Quarterly 41: 455–74. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2007) ‘Who consults? Expert groups in the European Union’, Working Paper 12, Oslo: ARENA.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2008) ‘Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union’, West European Politics 31(4): 725–50. doi: 10.1080/01402380801905991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2013) ‘‘Societal inclusion’ in expert venues – a note on the participation of interest groups and corporate actors in EU policy making’, Paper presented at the EPISTO workshop, Oslo, 4–5 April.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996) ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44(5): 936–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A.H. (2008) ‘Regional authority in 42 democracies, 1950–2006. A measure and five hypotheses’, Regional and Federal Studies 18(2–3): 111–302. doi: 10.1080/13597560801979464
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. (2004) The Rules of Federalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2010) ‘Europeanization of lobbying activities: when national interest groups spill over to the European level’, Journal of European Integration 32(2): 175–91. doi: 10.1080/07036330903486037
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2011) ‘The contextual nature of lobbying: explaining lobbying success in the European Union’, European Union Politics 12(4): 483–506. doi: 10.1177/1465116511413163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, K. and Merkl, P. (1988) When Parties Fail, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmbruch, G. (1984) ‘Concertation and the structure of corporatist networks’, in J.H. Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 60–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, C. (1984) ‘Preconditions for corporatism’, in J.H. Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, C.S. (1981) ‘Fictitious bonds … of wealth and law: on the theory and practice of interest representation’, in S. Berger (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe : Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–60.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984) ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, The American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–49. doi: 10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. (1996) ‘An actor-centred approach to multi-level governance’, Regional & Federal Studies 6(2): 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13597569608420966
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996) ‘European integration from the 1980s: state-centric v. multi-level governance’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3): 341–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C.J. and Swank, D. (2008) ‘The political origins of coordinated capitalism: business organizations, party systems, and state structure in the age of innocence’, American Political Science Review 102(02): 181–98. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C.J. and Swank, D. (2012) The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality, Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michalowitz, I. (2007) ‘What determines influence? Assessing conditions for decision-making influence of interest groups in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(1): 132–51. doi: 10.1080/13501760601072719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.-M. and Hansen, L. (2001) ‘The EU public procurement regime – Does it work?’, Intereconomics 36(5): 255–63. doi: 10.1007/BF02928979
   Google Scholar
• Ozer, M. and Lee, S.-H. (2009) ‘When do firms prefer individual action to collective action in the pursuit of corporate political strategy? A new perspective on industry concentration’, Business and Politics 11(1): 1–21. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1234
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2008) ‘Forms of informal governance: searching for efficiency and democracy’, in T. Christiansen and T. Larsson (eds), The Role of Committees in the Policy-Process of the European Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Cowles, M. and Caporaso, J. (2001) ‘Europeanization and domestic change: introduction’, in J.C.M.G. Cowles and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. (1984) ‘Economic and institutional constraints of full-employment strategies: Sweden, Austria, and Western Germany, 1973–1982’, in J. Goldthorpe (ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 257–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. (2001) ‘The politics of economic adjustment in France and Britain: when does discourse matter?’, Journal of European Public Policy 8(2): 247–64. doi: 10.1080/13501760110041578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. (1974) ‘Still the century of corporatism?’, The Review of Politics 36(1): 85–131. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500022178
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. (1977) ‘Modes of interest intermediation and models of societal change in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 10(1): 7–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. and Lehmbruch, G. (1979) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sovey, A.J. and Green, D.P. (2011) ‘Instrumental variables estimation in political science: a readers’ guide’, American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 188–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, B. (2004) ‘Contestation potential of interest groups in the EU: emergence, structure, and political alliances’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds), European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge Universoty Press, pp. 195–215.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A., Baumgartner, F.R., Mahoney, C. and Berkhout, J. (2010) ‘Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population’, European Union Politics 11(3): 463–76. doi: 10.1177/1465116510369267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar