The European Parliament's strategy in EU economic and financial reform

REFERENCES

• Alliance of Liberals and Democrats in the European Parliament (ALDE) (2011) ‘Economic governance package must contain strong sanctions to be credible’, Press Release, 23 June.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetto, G. (2005) ‘Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe's Parliament’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(1): 67–88. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000311916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S. and Farrell, M. (1995) ‘The organizing of the European Parliament: committees, specialization and co-ordination’, British Journal of Political Science 25(2): 219–43. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. (2005) ‘Who pays? Who gains? How do costs and benefits shape the policy influence of the European Parliament?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(3): 485–505. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00566.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R. (2011) ‘Does bicameralism promote stability? Interinstitutional relations and coalition formation in the European Parliament’, West European Politics 34(1): 122–44. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.523548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R. and Thomson, R. (2010) ‘The policy impact of leadership in committees: rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament's opinions’, European Union Politics 11(2): 219–40. doi: 10.1177/1465116510353459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R. and Thomson, R. (2011) ‘The nexus of bicameralism: rapporteurs’ impact on decision outcomes in the European Union’, European Union Politics 12: 337–57. doi: 10.1177/1465116511410087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R. and Thomson, R. (2013) ‘The distribution of power among EU institutions: who wins under codecision and why?’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 1025–39. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2011) ‘Council sets out its approach on the creation of three European supervisory authorities for financial services’, Press Release, 2 December 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, C. (1996) ‘Legislative procedures in the European Community’, British Journal of Political Science 26(2): 199–228. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400000429
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank (2009) ‘Opinion on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board and a proposal for a Council Decision entrusting the ECB with specific tasks concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board’, CON/2009/88, Frankfurt: ECB.
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank (2010) ‘Opinion on three proposals for regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Banking Authority, a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and a European Securities and Markets Authority’, CON/2010/5, Frankfurt: ECB.
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank (2011) ‘Opinion of the European Central Bank of 16 February 2011 on economic governance reform in the European Union’, CON/2011/13, Frankfurt: ECB.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) ‘Green paper on the feasibility of introducing stability bonds’, COM (2011) 818 final, 23 November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2011) ‘Conclusions of the meeting of 24–25 March 2011’, Brussels, 20 April, available at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/120296.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2010a) ‘Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community macro prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board’, A7-0168/2010, 25 May, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2010-0168+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2010b) ‘Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Banking Authority’, A7-066/2010, 3 June, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2010-0166+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2010c) ‘More powerful EU financial supervisory bodies and less national interest, demand MEPs’, Press Release, 24 February, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+IM-PRESS+20100223IPR69355+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011a), ‘Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies’, A7-0178/2011, 29 April, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2011-0178+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011b) ‘Report on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure’, A7-0179/2011, 2 May, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2011-0179+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011c) ‘Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area’, A7-0180/2011, 2 May, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2011-0180+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011d) ‘Parliament seals its position ahead of European Council’, Press Release 23 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011e) ‘Resolution on the ECB Annual Report 2010’, Own Initiative Report 2011/2156(INI), 1 December, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011IP0530&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011f) ‘Smarter and tougher economic governance dominate key committee votes’, Press Release 1 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2012a) ‘Code of Conduct for negotiating in the context of the ordinary legislative procedures’, Annex XX of the EP rules of Procedure, January, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+RULES-EP+20100705+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2012b) ‘European Parliament resolution of 18 January 2012 on the European Council of 8–9 December 2011’, 2011/2546(RSP), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P7-TA-2012-0002+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2003) ‘Formal and informal institutions under codecision: continuous constitution-building in Europe’, Governance, 16 (4): 577–600. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Hix, S. and Scully, R. (2011) ‘EPRG MEP survey dataset’, available at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/EPRG/MEPsurveyData.aspx (accessed 25 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Finke, D. (2012) ‘Proposal stage coalition-building in the European Parliament’, European Union Politics 13: 487–512. doi: 10.1177/1465116512447013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. and Tsebelis, G. (2001) ‘Understanding better the EU legislative process’, European Union Politics 2: 353–61. doi: 10.1177/1465116501002003005
   Google Scholar
• Giegold, S. (2011) ‘Hintergrundinformation zur Umsetzung des Scoreboards zur Analyse von wirtschaftlichen Ungleichgewichten’, November, available at http://www.sven-giegold.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Scoreboard_dossier_nov_2011-FV-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Greens/European Free Alliance in the EP (2009) ‘European Parliament will not agree to water down the new European authorities’, Press Release, 2 December 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Guy Peters, B. (1998) Comparative Politics, Theory and Method, New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häge, F. and Kaeding, M. (2007) ‘Reconsidering the European Parliament's legislative influence: formal vs informal procedures’, Journal of European Integration 29(3): 341–61. doi: 10.1080/07036330701442356
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S. and Hoyland, B. (2010) ‘Bicameral politics in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 811–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Raunio, T. and Scully, R. (2003) ‘Fifty years on: research on the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 191–202. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. and Bullmann, U. (2011) ‘Austerity alone won't resolve the eurozone crisis’, S&D Statement, Press Release, 28 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kaeding, M. (2004) ‘What drives rapporteurship allocation in the European Parliament?’, European Union Politics 5(3): 355–73. doi: 10.1177/1465116504045157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeding, M. and Obholzer, L. (2012) ‘Pulling the strings: party group coordinators in the European Parliament’, EIPAscope, 2012(1): 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kardasheva, R. (2009) ‘Legislative package deals in EU decision-making: 1999–2007’, Ph.D. dissertation, European Institute, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (1999) ‘What affects the European Parliament's legislative influence? An analysis of the success of EP amendments’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 521–38. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1971) ‘Comparative politics and the comparative method’, American Political Science Review 65: 682–93. doi: 10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. (2003) ‘The European Parliament in the economic governance of the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 249–67. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.t01-1-00421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, D. (2010) ‘Who to lobby and when: institutional determinants of interest group strategies in 2010 European Parliament committees’, European Union Politics 11(4): 553–75. doi: 10.1177/1465116510382462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, G. (2006) ‘Committee representation in the European Parliament’, European Union Politics 7: 15–29. doi: 10.1177/1465116506060910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordeshook, P.C. (1986) Game Theory and Political Theory: An introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970) The logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2012) ‘Europe's deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 161–78. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.609743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organisation 42(3): 427–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. (2011) ‘Early conclusion in bicameral bargaining: evidence from the co-decision legislative procedure of the European Union’, European Union Politics 12: 41–64. doi: 10.1177/1465116510388675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Reh, C. (2013) ‘The consequences of concluding codecision early: trilogues and intra-institutional bargaining success’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 1006–24. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Toshkov, V. (2011) ‘The inter-institutional division of power and time allocation in the European Parliament’, West European Politics 34(1): 71–96. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.523545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C., Héritier, A., Bressanelli, A. and Koop, C. (2013) ‘The informal politics of legislation: explaining secluded decision-making in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies 46(9): 1112–42. doi: 10.1177/0010414011426415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2014) ‘Integration without representation? The European Parliament and the reform of economic governance in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies 52(6): 1174–83. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T.C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., and Hosli M. (2006) ‘Who has power in the EU? The Commission, Council and Parliament in legislative decision-making’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(2): 391–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trichet, J.C. (2011) ‘Introductory statement – hearing at the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament’, 30 June.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., Jensen, C.B., Kalandrakis, A. and Kreppel, A. (2001) ‘Legislative procedures in the European Union: an empirical analysis’, British Journal of Political Science 31(4): 573–99. doi: 10.1017/S0007123401000229
   Google Scholar
• Yordanova, N. (2009) ‘The rationale behind committee assignment in the European Parliament: distributive, informational and partisan perspectives’, European Union Politics 10(2): 253–80. doi: 10.1177/1465116509103377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar