‘Man Overboard!’ Was EU influence on the Maritime Labour Convention lost at sea?

REFERENCES

• Alston, P. (2005) ‘Labour rights as human rights: the not so happy state of the art’ in P. Alston, et al (eds), Labour Rights as Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. and Risse, T. (2012) ‘From Europeanization to diffusion: introduction’, West European Politics 35(1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavicchiolo, L. (2002) ‘The relations between the European Community and the International Labour Organisation’, in E. Cannizzaro (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 261–9.
   Google Scholar
• Council (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Council (2007) ‘Council decision authorising member states to ratify, in the interests of the European Community, the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, of the International Labour Organisation’, 2007/431/EC, 7 June 2007, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market power Europe,’ Journal of European Public Policy 19(5): 682–99. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.646779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. (2008) ‘Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research’, in D. della Porta and M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralistic Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–222.
   Google Scholar
• Delarue, R. (2006) ‘ILO–EU cooperation on employment and social affairs’, in J. Wouters, F. Hoffmeister and T. Ruys (eds), The United Nations and the European Union. An Ever Closer Partnership, The Hague: TMC Asser Press, pp. 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D.W. (2007) All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ECJ (1993) ‘Opinion 2/91: Convention N° 170 of the International Labour Organization concerning safety in the use of chemicals at work’, OJ C109, Brussels, 19 April.
   Google Scholar
• ESC (1995) ‘Own-Initiative opinion on: relations between the EU and the International Labour Organisation’, CES 46/95, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2001) ‘Promoting core labour standards and improving social governance in the context of globalisation, COM (2001) 416 final, Brussels, 18 June.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2006) ‘Communication from the Commission under Article 138(2) of the EC Treaty on the strengthening of maritime labour standards’, COM (2006) 287 final, Brussels, 15 June.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2001) ‘Final report’, TWGMLS/2001/10, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2002) ‘Final report’, TWGMLS/2002/13, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2003) ‘Final report’, TWGMLS/2003/10, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2004a) ‘Final report’, TWGMLS/2004/19, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2004b) ‘Preparatory technical maritime conference, report of Committee No. 1’, PTMC/04/3-1, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2004c) ‘Preparatory technical maritime conference, report of Committee No. 2’, PTMC/04/3-2, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2004d) ‘Preparatory technical maritime conference, report of Committee No. 3’, PTMC/04/3-3, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2005a) ‘Report of the discussion’, PTMC/2005/23, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2005b) ‘Unresolved issues for the draft consolidated maritime labour Convention 2006’, PTMC/2005/1, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2006a) Provisional Record 7 Part I Report of the Committee Of the Whole, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO (2006b) Provisional Record 7 Part II Proposed Consolidated Maritime Labour Convention, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. (2005) European Welfare States and Supranational Governance of Social Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. (2008) ‘EU actorness in the International Labour Organisation: comparing declaratory and voting cohesion’, Global Society 22(4): 469–89. doi: 10.1080/13600820802366417
   Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. (2009a) ‘How to lose friends and alienate people? The EU as a global social power’, European Journal of Social Policy 19(2): 99–116. doi: 10.1177/0958928708101864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. (2009b) ‘Writing a new normative standard? EU member states and the drafting and ratification of ILO labour standards’, in J. Orbie and L. Tortell (eds), The European Union's Role in the World and the Social Dimension of Globalisation, London: Routledge, pp. 98–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. (2011) The EU's performance in the International Labour Organization’, Journal of European Integration 33(6): 651–65. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2011.606689
   Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. (2014) ‘A changing role for the ILO in the EU promotion of labour standards over time: consistency and EU institutional evolution’, in A. Orsini (ed.), The European Union With(in) International Organisations: Continuity, Commitment and Consistency, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2009) ‘EU rules beyond EU borders: theorising external governance in European politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 791–812. doi: 10.1080/13501760903087696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. (2006) ‘Global and domestic governance: modes of interdependence in regulatory policymaking’ European Law Journal, (12)4: 455–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00327.x
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005) ‘The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism’, The Annals of the American Academy 598: 12–32. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies (40)2: 235–58. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedergaard, P. 2009. ‘The European Union at the ILO's international labour conferences: a “double” principal–agent analysis’, in K.E. Jørgensen (ed.), The European Union and International Organizations, London: Routledge, pp.149–66.
   Google Scholar
• Novitz, T. (2009) ‘In search of a coherent social policy: EU import and export of ILO labour standards?’, in J. Orbie and L. Torrell (eds), The European Union's Role in the World and the Social Dimension of Globalisation, London: Routledge, pp. 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. (2011) ‘Promoting labour standards through trade: normative power or regulatory state Europe?’, in R. Whitman (ed.), Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 160–83.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. and Babarinde, O. (2008) ‘The social dimension of globalization and EU development policy: promoting core labour standards and corporate social responsibility’, Journal of European Integration 30(2): 459–77. doi: 10.1080/07036330802142178
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. and Tortell, L. (2009a) ‘From the social clause to the social dimension of globalization’, in J. Orbie and L. Tortell (eds), The European Union's Role in the World and the Social Dimension of Globalisation, London: Routledge, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. and Tortell, L. (2009b) ‘The new GSP+ beneficiaries: ticking the box or truly consistent with ILO findings?’, European Foreign Affairs Review 14(3): 663–81.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. (2008) ‘Interests or principles? EU foreign policy in the ILO?’, RECON Online Working Paper 2008/09, ARENA.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. (2010) ‘A matter of principle? EU foreign policy in the International Labour Organization’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(4): 581–98. doi: 10.1080/13501761003673401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. and Sjursen, H. (2012) ‘Playing into the hands of the Commission? The case of EU coordination in the ILO’, in O. Costa and K.E. Jørgensen (eds), The Influence of International Institutions on the European Union: When Multilateralism hits Brussels, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 42–57.
   Google Scholar
• Saenen, B. (2014) ‘The causal relation between the European Union's coherence and effectiveness in international institutions: the Union in the standard-setting procedure of the International Labour Organization’, PhD thesis, University of Ghent, Ghent.
   Google Scholar
• Saenen, B. and Orbie, J. (2011) ‘Challenges to coherence: exploring the European Union's role in the International Labour Organization’, in J. Lieb, N. von Ondarza and D. Schwarzer (eds), The EU in International Fora. Lessons for the Union's External Representation after Lisbon, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 159–74
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2014) ‘Extraterritoriality and territorial extension in EU Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 62: 87–126. doi: 10.5131/AJCL.2013.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortell, L., Delarue, R. and Kenner, J. (2009) ‘The EU and the ILO Maritime Labour Convention’, in J. Orbie and L. Tortell (eds), The European Union's Role in the World and the Social Dimension of Globalisation, London: Routledge, pp. 113–30.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.R. (2015) ‘The European Union as a global regulator? Context and comparison’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1046902.
   Google Scholar