2,271
Views
55
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Agenda Section: Edited by Michael Blauberger

IMAGES OF AN UNBIASED INTEREST SYSTEM

REFERENCES

  • Allern, E.H. and Bale, T. (2012) ‘Political parties and interest groups: disentangling complex relationships’, Party Politics 18: 7–25. doi: 10.1177/1354068811422639
  • Anderson, J., Newmark, A., Gray, A. and Lowery, D. (2004) ‘Mayflies and old bulls: demographic volatility and experience in state interest communities’, State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4: 140–60. doi: 10.1177/153244000400400202
  • Baumgartner, F. and Leech, B.L. (2001) ‘Issue niches and policy bandwagons: patterns of interest group involvement in national politics’ Journal of Politics 63: 1191–213. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00106
  • Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Berkhout, J., Beyers, J., Braun, C., Hanegraaff, M. and Lowery, D. (2014) ‘Making inferences across mobilization and influence research: comparing top-down and bottom-up mapping of interest systems’, Paper presented at the ECPR general conference, Glasgow, 3–6 September.
  • Berkhout, J., Carroll, B.J., Braun, C., Chalmers, A., Destrooper, T., Lowery, D., Otjes, S. and Rasmussen, A. (2015) ‘Interest organizations across economic sectors: explaining interest group density in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 462–80. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008549
  • Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2011) ‘Short-term volatility in the EU interest community’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 1–16. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.520868
  • Berry, J.M. (1999) The New Liberalism, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Berry, J.M. and Portney, K E. (2014) ‘The group basis of city politics’, in R. Pekkanen, S.R. Smith and Y. Tsujinaka (eds), Nonprofits and Advocacy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 21–46.
  • Beyers, J., De Bruyker, I. and Baller, I. (2015) ‘The alignment of parties and interest groups in EU legislative politics: a tale of two different worlds?’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 534–51. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008551
  • Denzau, A.T. and Munger, M.C. (1986) ‘Legislators and interest groups’, American Political Science Review 80: 89–106. doi: 10.2307/1957085
  • Finer, S.E. (1958) Anonymous Empire, London: Pall Mall.
  • Frymer, P. (2010) Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gilens, M. (2012) Affluence and Influence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Gilens, M. and Page, B.I. (2014) ‘Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens’, Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81. doi: 10.1017/S1537592714001595
  • Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Heinz, J.P., Laumann, E.O., Nelson, R.L. and Salisbury, R.H. (1993) The Hollow Core, London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hilgartner, S. and Bosk, C.L. (1988) ‘The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model’, American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 53–78. doi: 10.1086/228951
  • Jordan, G. (1993) ‘The pluralism of pluralism: an anti-theory?’, in J. Richardson (ed.), Pressure Groups, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 286–301.
  • Klüver, H. (2013) Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions and Policy Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lowery, D. (2007) ‘Why do organized interests lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying’, Polity 39(1): 29–54. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300077
  • Lowery, D. (2013) ‘Lobbying influence: meaning, measurement, and missing’, Interest Groups and Advocacy 2(1): 1–26. doi: 10.1057/iga.2012.20
  • Lowery, D. (2015) ‘Mancur Olson. the logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups’, in E. Page, S. Balla and M. Lodge (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Classics of Public Policy and Administration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–20.
  • Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2004) ‘A neopluralist perspective on research on organized interests’, Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 163–75. doi: 10.2307/3219843
  • Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2001) ‘The expression of density dependence in state communities of organized interests’, American Politics Research 29(4): 374–91. doi: 10.1177/1532673X01029004003
  • Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2014) ‘On the nature and origins of bias in the heavenly chorus’, manuscript, Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University.
  • Lowery, D., Gray, V. and Fellowes, M. (2005) ‘Sisyphus meets the Borg: economic scale and the inequalities in interest representation’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 17(1): 41–74. doi: 10.1177/0951629805047798
  • Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels Versus the Beltway, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Majone, G. (2002) Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.
  • Marchetti, K.M. (2014) ‘Crossing the intersection: the representation of disadvantaged identities in advocacy’, Politics, Groups, and Identities 2: 104–19. doi: 10.1080/21565503.2013.876919
  • Mazey, S. and Richardson J. (1993) Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McFarland, A.S. (1987) ‘Interest groups and theories of power in America’, British Journal of Political Science 17(2): 129–47. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400004683
  • Messer, A., Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2010) ‘The density of the EU interest system: a test of the ESA model’, British Journal of Political Science 40(5): 161–90.
  • Offe, C. (1998) ‘“Homogeneity” and constitutional democracy: coping with identity conflicts through group rights’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 6(2): 113–41. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00049
  • Olson, M., Jr. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Portney, K.E. and Berry, J.M. (2014) ‘Civil society and sustainable cities’, Comparative Political Studies 47: 395–419. doi: 10.1177/0010414013509574
  • Richardson, J.J. (1993) Pressure Groups, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Richardson, J. (1994) ‘EU water policy: uncertain agendas, shifting networks and complex coalitions’, Environmental Politics 3(4): 139–67. doi: 10.1080/09644019408414170
  • Richardson, J. (2000) ‘Government, interest groups and policy change’, Political Studies 48(5): 1006–25. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00292
  • Richardson, J. (2012) Constructing a Policy-Making State? Policy Dynamics in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Salisbury, R. (1992) Interests and Institutions, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semisovereign People, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Schlozman, K.L. (2010) ‘Who sings in the heavenly chorus? The shape of the organized interest system’, in L.S. Maisel and J.M. Berry (eds), The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–50.
  • Schlozman, K.L. and Tierney, J.T. (1986) Organized Interests and American Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.
  • Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S. and Brady, H.E. (2012) The Unheavenly Chorus, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Strolovitch, D.Z. (2007) Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Trenz, H.-J. (2014) ‘Mediated representative politics: the euro-crisis and the politicization of the EU’, in S. Kröger (ed.), Political Representation in the European Union: Still Democratic in Times of Crisis? London: Routledge, pp. 181–96.
  • Truman, D. B. (1951) The Governmental Process, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Wonka, A., Baumgartner, F.R., Mahoney, C. and Berkhout, J. (2010) ‘Measuring the size and scope of the European Union interest group population’, European Union Politics 11(3): 463–76. doi: 10.1177/1465116510369267
  • Wilson, J.Q. (1980) The Politics of Regulation, New York: Basic Books.
  • Wright, J. (2004) ‘Campaign contributions and congressional voting on tobacco policy, 198–-2000’, Business and Politics 6: 1–26. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1066

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.