Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism

REFERENCES

• Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. and Turner, B.S. (1980) The Dominant Ideology Thesis, London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. (1971) ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation)’, in L. Althusser (ed.), Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, London: Verso, pp. 121–76.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (1976) ‘The antinomies of Antonio Gramsci’, New Left Review 100(1976–7): 5–78.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1951) The Origins of Totalitarianism, New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. (1962) ‘Two faces of power’, American Political Science Review 56: 947–52. doi: 10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D.A. (2013) ‘Power and international relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 273–97.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) ‘Power in international politics’, International Organization 59(4): 39–75.
   Google Scholar
• Beland, D. (2009) ‘Ideas, institutions, and policy change’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(5): 701–18. doi: 10.1080/13501760902983382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2010) ‘The idea of power and the role of ideas’, Political Studies Review 8: 145–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00199.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D. and Cox R.H. (2011) ‘Introduction: ideas and politics’, in D. Béland and R.H. Cox (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2001) ‘The transformation of the Swedish model: economic ideas, distributional conflict, and institutional change’, World Politics 54(1): 1–26. doi: 10.1353/wp.2001.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2013) ‘Paradigms and paradox: the politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis’, Governance 26(2): 197–215. doi: 10.1111/gove.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M., Helgadottir, O. and Kring, W. (forthcoming) ‘Ideas and historical institutionalism’, in O. Fioretos (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1994) Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l'action, Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.L. (1998) ‘Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy’, Theory and Society 27(3): 377–409. doi: 10.1023/A:1006871114987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M.B. (2011a) ‘Paradigm man vs the bricoleur: bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change’, European Political Science Review 3(1): 147–67. doi: 10.1017/S1755773910000342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M.B. (2011b) ‘Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: a theory of incremental ideational change’, Political Studies 59(3): 596–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00868.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R.H. (2001) ‘The social construction of an imperative: why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany’, World Politics 55(3): 463–98. doi: 10.1353/wp.2001.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2008) ‘The politics of common knowledge: ideas and institutional change’, International Organization 62(1): 1–33. doi: 10.1017/S0020818308080016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. (1957) ‘The concept of power’, Behavioral Science 2(3): 201–15. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. (1968) ‘Power’, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2000) Power. Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 3, ed. JD Faubion. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2004) Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au College de France, 1978–1979, Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P.M. (1992) ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, Internatiuonal Oganization 46: 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (1997) The Constitution of Power: A Theoretical Analysis of Power, Knowledge and Structure, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2011) ‘Power and truth’, European Journal of Social Theory 15(1): 73–92. doi: 10.1177/1368431011423591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002) Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. and Rosamond, N. (2002) ‘Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of economic imperatives’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(2): 147–67. doi: 10.1080/13501760110120192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. and Lukes, S. (2008) ‘Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: a dialogue’, Journal of Power 1(1): 5–20. doi: 10.1080/17540290801943364
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2009) ‘Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies’, Critical Policy Studies 3(3–4): 309–55. doi: 10.1080/19460171003619725
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. (1990) ‘Institutions, veto points, and policy results: a comparative analysis of health care’, Journal of Public Policy 10(4): 391–416. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00006061
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C. (2014) ‘Ideas, power and change: explaining EU–Russia energy relations’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(1): 58–75. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.835062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems, New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2011) ‘The varied roles of ideas in politics: from “whether” to “how’”’ in D. Béland and R.H. Cox (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 28–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C.W. (1956 [2000]) The Power Elite, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moschella, M. and Tsingou, E. (eds) (2013) Great Expectations, Slow Transformations: Incremental change in post-crisis regulation, Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. (2013) ‘Resilient neo-liberalism in European financial regualtion’, in V.A. Schmidt and M. Thatcher (eds), Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–25.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (2002) A Certain Idea of Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (2007) How to Map Arguments in Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. (1982) Political Power and Social Classes, London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M. (1988) ‘Structural dependence of the state on capital’, American Political Science Review 82(1): 11–29. doi: 10.2307/1958056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T., Ropp, S.C. and Sikkink, K. (eds) (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (1992) ‘Labor-market institutions and working-class strength’, in K. Thelen and S. Steinmo (eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R., J. (1998) ‘What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge’, International Organization 52(4): 855–85. doi: 10.1162/002081898550770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (eds) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. (2002) The Futures of European Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. (2008) ‘Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. (2011) ‘Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation’, Critical Policy Studies 5(2): 106–26. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. and Thatcher, M. (2013) Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V.A. (forthcoming) ‘The roots of neo-liberal resilience: explaining continuity and change in background ideas in Europe's political economy’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W and Thelen, K. (2005) ‘Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Stiller, S. (2010) Ideational Leadership in German Welfare State Reforms, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999) ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therborn, G. (1980) The Power of Ideology and the Ideology of Power, London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Tsingou, E. (2014) ‘Club governance and the making of global financial rules’, Review of International Political Economy, doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.890952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Appeldorn, B. (2001) Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widmaier, W., Blyth, M. and Seabrooke, L. (2007) ‘Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises’, International Studies Quarterly 51(4): 747–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E.O. (1997) Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K. (2013) ‘Financial industry groups’ adaptation to the post-crisis regulatory environment: changing approaches to the policy cycle’, Regulation & Governance 7(4): 460–80. doi: 10.1111/rego.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar