Framing and advocacy: a research agenda for interest group studies

References

• Agustín, L.R. (2008) ‘Civil society participation in EU gender policy-making: framing strategies and institutional constraints’, Parliamentary Affairs 61(3): 505–17. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. (2007) ‘EU lobbying: a view from the US’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 482–8.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Leech, B.L. and Kimball, D.C. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., De Boef, S.L. and Boydstun, A.E. (2008) The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Mahoney, C. (2008) ‘Forum section: the two faces of framing individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union’, European Union Politics 9(3): 435–49. doi:10.1177/1465116508093492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P. and Trani, B. (2012) ‘Interest group mobilization and lobbying patterns in Britain: a newspaper analysis’, Interest groups & Advocacy 1(1): 4–66.
   Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A., Chaques Bonafont, L. and Halpin, D. (forthcoming) ‘Diversity in the news? A study of interest groups in the media in the UK, Spain and Denmark’, British Journal of Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Boräng, F., et al. (2014) ‘Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods’, Interest groups & Advocacy 3(2): 188–201. doi: 10.1057/iga.2014.12
   Google Scholar
• Boräng, F. and Naurin, D. (2015) ‘ "Try to see it my way!"Frame congruence between lobbyists and European Commission officials’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1008555.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M.A., Scheufele, D.A. and Iyengar, S. (2016) ‘The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects’, Mass Communication and Society 19(1): 7–23. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, J.J., Breeman, G.E., Stiller, S.J. and Termeer, C.J. (2014) ‘Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: the case of the EU Common Agricultural Policy reform debate’, Food Policy 44: 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2011) Policy Framing in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230343528
   Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. (2015) ‘Pressure and expertise: explaining information supply in EU legsilative lobbying’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. doi:10.1111/jcms.12298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. and Beyers, J. (2015) ‘Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media’, Political Communication 32(3): 453–74. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.958259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. (2005) ‘News framing: theory and typology’, Information Design Journal & Document Design 13(1): 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., et el. (2009) ‘Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective’, Human relations 62(2): 155–93. doi: 10.1177/0018726708100356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J.N. (2001) ‘The implications of framing effects for citizen competence’, Political Behavior 23(3): 225–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1015006907312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J.N. (2004) ‘Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects’, American Political Science Review 98(04): 671–86. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404041413
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, G. and Richardson, J. (1999) ‘Competing advocacy coalitions and the process of “frame reflection": a longitudinal analysis of EU steel policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 225–48. doi: 10.1080/135017699343694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A. (2008) ‘Measuring interest group influence in the EU: a note on methodology’, European Union Politics 9(4): 559–76. doi: 10.1177/1465116508095151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R., Rasch, D. and Rozbicka, P. (2015) ‘Institutions, policies, and arguments: context and strategy in EU policy framing’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 516–33. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1008552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R.M. (1993) ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of communication 43(4): 51–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47(2): 263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., Braun, C. and Beyers, J. (2015a) ‘Legislative lobbying in context: towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 447–61. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. and Mahoney, C. (2015) ‘Measuring interest group framing strategies in public policy debates’, Journal of Public Policy 35(2): 223–44. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X14000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., Mahoney, C. and Opper, M. (2015b) ‘Framing in context: how interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 481–98 doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzer, P. and Cooper, A. (2013) ‘Biased or not? Organized interests and the case of EU food information labeling’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(5): 722–40. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.751703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, B. (2010) ‘Lobbying and influence’, in S. Maisel, J. Berry and G. Edwards III (eds), The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 568–87.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D.M. and Shah, D.V. (2014) News Frames and National Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, L.W. (1960) ‘Lobbying as a communication process’, Public Opinion Quarterly 24(1): 32–53. doi: 10.1086/266928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D. (2007) Deliberation Behind Closed Doors: Transparency and Lobbying in the European Union, Colchester: ECPR.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M. and Clawson, R.A. (1997) ‘Toward a psychology of framing effects’, Political Behavior 19(3): 221–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M. and Schön, D. (1991) ‘Frame-reflective policy discourse’, Social Sciences and Modern States 9(1): 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. and Iyengar, S. (2012) ‘The state of framing research: a call for new directions’, in K. Kenski and K. Hall Jamieson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Theories, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, A. and Fischer, M. (2014) ‘In search of political influence: outside lobbying behaviour and media coverage of social movements, interest groups and political parties in six Western European countries’, International Political Science Review 36(4): 355–72. doi: 10.1177/0192512113505627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981) ‘The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice’, Science 211(4481): 453–8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Melenhorst, L., van Holsteyn, J. and Veen, J. (2015) ‘Lawmaking and news making: different worlds after all? A study on news coverage of legislative processes in the Netherlands’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 21(4): 534–52. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2015.1060071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voltolini, B. (2015) ‘Non-state actors and framing processes in EU foreign policy: the case of EU–Israel relations’. Journal of European Public Policy doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1085429.
   Google Scholar