Managing the house: the Presidency, agenda control and policy activism in the European Commission

References

• Barroso, J.M. (2014) ‘We are determined to make EU laws more business friendly’, Daily Telegraph, 19 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. (2008) ‘Special issue: reforming the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(5): 625–6. doi: 10.1080/13501760802133104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W., Becker, S., Connolly, S. and Kassim, H. (2015) ‘The Commission: boxed in and constrained, still an engine of integration? ’, Unpublished paper
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., and Siebenhüner, B. (eds) (2009) Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (2015). ‘European integration after the “Spitzenkandidaten”: the new dynamics of EU leadership change,’ Integration (1) Berlin: IEP.
   Google Scholar
• Cini, M. (1996). The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation, and Culture in the EU Administration, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Claude, I.L., Jr (1964 [1956]) Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization, London: University of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockfield, A. (1994) The European Union: Creating the Single Market, London: Wiley Chancery Law.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (1963) ‘Rules of procedure of the EEC Commission’, OJ, 31 January 1963, p. 181
   Google Scholar
• Commission (1993) Rules of Procedure of the Commission of 17 February 1993, OJL 230, 11 9 1993, 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2004) ‘Communication to the members of the Commission: functioning of the Commission and internal coordination,’ SEC(2004)1617/4, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2005) ‘Commission decision of 15 November 2005 amending its Rules of Procedure’, OJ L 347, 30 12 2005, pp. 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2010a) ‘Commission decision of 24 February 2010 “The Working Methods of the Commission 2010–2014”’, C (2010) 1100, 10 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• Commission (2010b) ‘Communication from the President: Amending its Rules of Procedure’, OJ L 55, 5 March 2010, pp. 60–7.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, D. (1970) Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community a Portrait of the Commission of the E.E.C., London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.W. (1969). ‘The executive head: an essay on leadership in international organization’, International Organization 23(2): 205–30. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003157X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R.W., and Jacobson, H.K. (eds) (1973) The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delors, J. (2004) Mémoires, Paris: Plon.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinas, A.A. and Suleiman, E. (2012) The European Commission and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Europe's Custodians, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endo, K. (1999) The Presidency of the European Commission under Jacques Delors: The Politics of Shared Leadership, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. (1964). Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Organization, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallstein, W. (1972) Europe in the Making, London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2014) Which Policy for Europe?
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, J. (ed.) (2008) Leaderless Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joana, J. and Smith, A. (2002) Les Commissaires Européens: Technocrates, Diplomates ou Politiques? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Jonah, J.O.C. (2007) ‘Secretariat: independence and reform’, in S. Daws and T.G. Weiss (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 160–74.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2014a) ‘EP plenary session: extracts from the presentation by Jean-Claude Juncker of the College of Commissioners and their programme’, Strasbourg, October 22, available at https://ec.europa.eu/avservices/video/shotlist.cfm?ref=I094111 (accessed 6 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2014b) ‘The Juncker Commission: a strong and experienced team standing for change’, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-984_en.htm (accessed 15 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2004a) ‘The Kinnock reforms in perspective: why reforming the Commission is an heroic, but thankless, task’, Public Policy and Administration 19(3): 25–41. doi: 10.1177/095207670401900304
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2004b) ‘A historic accomplishment? The Prodi Commission and administrative reform’, in D.G. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.), The Changing European Commission, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 33–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2006) ‘The Secretariat General of the European Commission’, in D. Spence with G. Edwards (eds), The European Commission, 3rd edn, London: John Harper, pp. 75–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2010) ‘A silent transformation: leadership and coordination in the European Commission since 2005’, Council for European Studies Seventeenth International Conference, Montreal, 15–17 April.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2008) ‘“Mission impossible”, but mission accomplished: the Kinnock reforms and the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(5): 648–68. doi: 10.1080/13501760802133146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2012) ‘The Presidents and Presidency of the European Commission’, in E. Jones, A. Menon, and S. Weatherill (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2016) ‘What’s new? A first appraisal of the Juncker Commission’, European Political Science, doi:10.1057/eps.2015.116.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. et al. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. and Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. (2007) ‘The European Commission and the future of Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(8): 1249–70. doi: 10.1080/13501760701656445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, D. (2014) ‘Commission unveils 2015 work programme’, European Voice, 16/12/14, 7:46 PM CET Updated 17/12/14, 9:40 AM CET, available at http://www.politico.eu/article/commission-unveils-2015-work-programme/ (accessed 6 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kille, K.J. and Scully, R.M. (2003). ‘Executive heads and the role of intergovernmental organizations: expansionist leadership in the United Nations and the European Union’, Political Psychology 24(1): 175–98. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Bauer, M.W. (2016) 'Policy-making by international public administrations: concepts, causes, and consequences, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1168979.
   Google Scholar
• Kurpas, S., Grøn, C. and Kaczynski, P.M. (2008) The European Commission after Enlargement: Does More add up to Less? Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Loth, W., Wallace, W., Wessels, W., and Ruppert, B. (1998) (eds) Walter Hallstein –The Forgotten European? London: Croom Helm
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1999) ‘A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation’, International Organization 53(2): 267–306. doi: 10.1162/002081899550887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (2003) The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinalda, B. and Verbeek, B. (2014) ‘Leadership of international organizations’, in R.A.W. Rhodes and P. t’Hart (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 595–609.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, G. (1995) Jacques Delors and European Integration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S.K. (2000) ‘Only an agenda setter? The European Commission’s power over the Council of Ministers’, European Union Politics 1(1): 37–61. doi: 10.1177/1465116500001001003
   Google Scholar
• Schön-Quinlivan, E. (2011) Reforming the European Commission, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. with G. Edwards (eds) (2006) The European Commission, 3rd ed., London: John Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2011) ‘Bureaucratic structure and administrative behaviour. Lessons from international bureaucracies’, West European Politics 34(4): 795–818. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.572392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugendhat, C. (1986) Making Sense of Europe, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013) The Normalization of the European Commission: Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R. (1991). ‘Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society’, International Organization 45(3): 281–308. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O.R. (1999) ‘Comment on Andrew Moravcsik, “A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation’’’, International Organization 53(4): 805–809.
   Google Scholar