Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats

References

• Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D. (2010) ‘International regulation without international government: improving IO performance through orchestration’, The Review of International Organizations 5(3): 315–44. doi: 10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W., da Conceição-Heldt, E. and Ege, J. (2015) ‘Autonomiekonzeptionen internationaler Organisationen im Vergleich’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 49: 28–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. and Knill, C. (eds) (2007) Management Reforms in International Organizations, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2004) ‘The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: the role and influence of the Council Secretariat’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 408–39. doi: 10.1080/rjpp13501760410001100279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B. (eds) (2009) Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brechin, S.R. and Ness, G.D. (2013) ‘Looking back at the gap: international organizations as organizations twenty-five years later’, Journal of International Organizations Studies 4: 14–39.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R.L. (2010) ‘Measuring delegation’, Review of International Organizations 5(2): 141–75. doi: 10.1007/s11558-009-9076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D.P. (2001) The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caughey, D., Cohon, A. and Chatfield, S. (2009) ‘Defining, measuring, and modeling bureaucratic autonomy’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 2 April.
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, A.P. and Peterson, S. (2006) ‘Dutiful agents, rogue actors or both? Staffing, voting rules, and slack in the WHO and WTO’, in D.G. Hawkins, D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson and M.J. Tierney (eds), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.W. and Jacobson, H.K. (1973) The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• da Conceição-Heldt, E. (2013) ‘Do agents “run amok”? A comparison of agency slack in the EU and US trade policy in the Doha Round’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(1): 21–36. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2012.754152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhard, S. and Ege, J. (2016) ‘International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: a review of empirical evidence’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1162837.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, J. (2016) Verwaltungsautonomie in internationalen Organisationen: Eine deskriptiv-vergleichende Analyse, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinas, A.A. and Suleiman, E.N. (2011) ‘Supranationalism in a transnational bureaucracy: the case of the European Commission’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49(5): 923–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2008) Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K.H. and Patz, R. (2016) ‘Pressured budgets and the European Commission: towards a more centralized EU budget administration?’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1162835.
   Google Scholar
• Haftel, Y.Z. and Thompson, A. (2006) ‘The independence of international organizations: concept and applications’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(2): 253–75. doi: 10.1177/0022002705285288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.G., Lake, D.A., Nielson, D.L. and Tierney, M.J. (2006) ‘Delegation under anarchy’, in D.G. Hawkins, D.A. Lake, D.L. Nielson and M.J. Tierney (eds), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2005) ‘Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization: a case study of the European Commission’, International Organization 59(4): 861–98. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2015) ‘Delegation and pooling in international organizations’, The Review of International Organizations 10(3): 305–28. doi: 10.1007/s11558-014-9194-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinnah, S. (2010) ‘Overlap management in the World Trade Organization: secretariat influence on trade-environment politics’, Global Environmental Politics 10(2): 54–79. doi: 10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörgens, H., Kolleck, N. and Saerbeck, B. (2016) ‘Exploring the hidden influence of international treaty secretariats: using social network analysis to analyse the Twitter debate on the “Lima Work Programme on Gender”’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1162836.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2014) Organizational Progeny: Why Governments are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. and Urpelainen, J. (2014) ‘International bureaucrats and the formation of intergovernmental organizations: institutional design discretion sweetens the pot’, International Organization 68(1): 177–209. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Ashley, S. and Lambright, W.H. (eds) (2014) Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. and Verhoest, K. (2014) ‘Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy: a state of the field and ways forward’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(2): 239–56. doi: 10.1177/0020852314524680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcussen, M. and Trondal, J. (2011) ‘The OECD civil servant: caught between Scylla and Charybdis’, Review of International Political Economy 18(5): 592–621. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2011.603665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. (1978) Soziologie der öffentlichen Verwaltung, Heidelberg: Müller.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, E.B. (1974) ‘Politics and the career mobility of bureaucrats’, The American Political Science Review 68(1): 18–26. doi: 10.2307/1959738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E.C. (1992) Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power – A Comparative Analysis, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’, International Organization 51(1): 99–134. doi: 10.1162/002081897550311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, V., Zangl, B. and Kruck, A. (2013) Internationale Organisationen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schnapp, K.-U. (2004) Ministerialbürokratien in westlichen Demokratien – Eine vergleichende Analyse, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study of Politics and Organization, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2000) ‘The anatomy of autonomy: an institutional account of variation in supranational influence’, Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): 843–64. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T. and Lundgren, M. ‘The performance of international organizations: a policy output approach’, Journal of European Public Policy, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1162834.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., Larsson, T. and Veggeland, F. (2012) ‘European administrative centre formation: lessons from international bureaucracies’, Comparative European Politics 10(1): 86–110. doi: 10.1057/cep.2011.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Peters, B.G., Bouckaert, G. and Verschuere, B. (2004) ‘The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review’, Public Administration and Development 24(2): 101–18. doi: 10.1002/pad.316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.Q. (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y.-C. and Weller, P. (2008) ‘“To be, but not to be seen”: exploring the impact of international civil servants’, Public Administration 86(1): 35–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar