The European Parliament as a developing legislature: coming of age in trilogues?

References

• Burns, C. (2005) ‘Who pays? Who gains? How do costs and benefits shape the policy influence of the European Parliament?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(3): 485−505.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. and Carter, N. (2010) ‘Is co-decision good for the environment? An analysis of the European Parliament’s green credentials’, Political Studies 58(1): 123–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00782.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C., Carter, N., Davies, G. and Worsfold, N. (2013) ‘Still saving the earth? The European Parliament’s environmental record’, Environmental Politics 22(6): 935–54. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.698880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. (2008) ‘Theory and practice of participation: civil society and EU development policy’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9(2): 241–55. doi: 10.1080/15705850801999792
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey, D. (1970) ‘The institutionalization of state legislatures: a comparative study’, The Western Political Quarterly 23(1): 180–96. doi: 10.2307/446551
   Google Scholar
• Cheneval, F., Lavenex, S., and Schimmelfennig, F. (2015) ‘Demoi-cracy in the European Union: principles, institutions, policies’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.886902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. and Neuhold, C. (2013) ‘Informal politics in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies 51(6): 1196–206. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes, C. (2015) ‘How the European Parliament’ s participation in international relations affects the deep tissue of the EU’ s power structures’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(4): 904–29. doi: 10.1093/icon/mou067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Observer (2014) ‘Secret EU lawmaking: the triumph of the trilogue’, available at http://euobserver.com/investigations/123555 (accessed 5 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Ombudsman (2015) 'Ombudsman launches public consultation on transparency of trilogues', Press release 15/2015, 10 December, available at http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/press/release.faces/en/61593/html.bookmark (accessed 10 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2004) Guidelines for First and Second Reading Agreements under the Codecision Procedure, Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2008) Working Party on Parliamentary Reform. Part B: Deliberations and Conclusions, Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2013) ‘20 years of codecision: conference report’, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/code/events/20131105/report.pdf (accessed 24 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2014a) ‘Committee statistical report: 7th legislature 2009–2014, DGIpol – Unit for Legislative Coordination’, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/code/about/starreport_en.pdf (accessed 9 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2014b) ‘Activity report on codecision and conciliation, 14 July 2009−30 June 2014 (7th parliamentary term)’, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/code/information/activity_reports/activity_report_2009_2014_en.pdf (accessed 9 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2015) ‘About MEPs … staffing arrangements’, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/about-meps.html (accessed 5 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and Héritier, A. (2004) ‘Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision-making: early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council’, Comparative Political Studies 37(10): 1184–212. doi: 10.1177/0010414004269833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Héritier, A. (2007) ‘Codecision and institutional change’, West European Politics 38(2): 285–300. doi: 10.1080/01402380701239723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furner, M. and Supple, B. (1990) ‘Ideas, institution and state’ in the United States and Britain: an introduction’, in M. Furner and B. Supple (eds), The State and Economic Knowledge: American and British Experiences, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. and Reh, C. (2012) ‘Codecision and its discontents: intra-organisational politics and institutional reform in the European Parliament’, West European Politics 35(5): 1134–57. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.706414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. (1988) ‘Legislative institutionalization with illustrations from the British House of Commons’, American Journal of Political Science 32(3): 681–712. doi: 10.2307/2111242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (1994) ‘The study of the European Community: the challenge to comparative politics’, West European Politics 17(1): 1–30. doi: 10.1080/01402389408424999
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A.G. and Roland, G. (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, K. and Shackleton, M. (2013) ‘Codecision: a practitioner’s view from inside the Parliament’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 1040–55. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1965) ‘Political development and political decay’, World Politics 17(3): 386–430. doi: 10.2307/2009286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International New York Times (2014) ‘E.U. chided for lack of openness’, available at http://news-business.vlex.com/vid/chided-corruption-growing-distrust-507432674 (accessed 16 June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Jacqué, J.-P. (2009) ‘Une vision réaliste de la procedure de codécision’ in Collectif, Mélanges en hommage à Georges Vandersanden, Brussels: Buylant, pp. 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, D. (1992) ‘Predestined to save the earth: the Environmental Committee of the European Parliament’, Environmental Politics 1(4): 186–212. doi: 10.1080/09644019208414051
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, J.T.S. (2005) ‘Mapping EU studies: the evolution from boutique to boom field 1960–2001’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(3): 551–82. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2012) ‘The normalization of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(5): 635–45. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.646769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, D. (2015) ‘Explaining interest group interactions with party group members in the European Parliament: dominant party groups and coalition formation’, Journal of Common Market Studies 53: 311–29. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis, K (2004) ‘We, the peoples of Europe … ’ Foreign Affairs 83(6): 97–110. doi: 10.2307/20034140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. (1983) Organised Democracy: Political Institutions in a Welfare State – The Case of Norway, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Orren, K. and Skowronek, S. (2004) The Search for American Political Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panke, D (2012) ‘Lobbying institutional key players: how states seek to influence the European Commission, the Council Presidency and the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 129–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piris, J.C. (2012) The Future of Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. (1968) ‘The institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives’, American Political Science Review 62(1): 144–68. doi: 10.1017/S0003055400115692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Reh, C. (2013) ‘The consequences of concluding codecision early: trilogues and intra institutional bargaining success’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 1006–24. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M (2012) ‘Is the European Parliament still a policy champion for environmental interests?’ Interest Groups & Advocacy 1(2): 239−59.
   Google Scholar
• Reh, C. (2014) ‘Is informal politics undemocratic? Trilogues, early agreements and the selection model of representation’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(6): 822–41. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.910247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. (2011) ‘Co-decision in the European Parliament: comparing rationalist and constructivists explanations of the “Returns Directive”’, Journal of Contemporary European Research 7(1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2005) Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C. and Greenwood, J. (2015) ‘The culture of trilogues’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(8): 1148–65. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sisson, R. (1973) ‘Comparing legislative institutionalization: a theoretical exploration’, in A. Kornberg (ed.), Legislatures in Comparative Perspective, New York: McKay, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronek, S. (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weale, A., Pridham, G., Cini, M., Konstadakopulos, D., Porter, M. and Flynn, B. (2000) European Environmental Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, R. (2011) The European Parliament’s Committees: National Party Influence and Legislative Empowerment, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar