Institutional issue proclivity in the EU: the European Council vs the Commission

References

• Alexandrova, P., Carammia, M., Princen, S. and Timmermans, A. (2014) ‘Measuring the European Council agenda: introducing a new approach and dataset’, European Union Politics 15(1): 152–67. doi: 10.1177/1465116513509124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrova, P. and Timmermans, A. (2015) ‘Agenda dynamics on energy policy in the EU’, in J. Tosun S. Biesenbender and K. Schulze (eds), Energy Policy Making in the EU: Building the Agenda, London: Springer, pp. 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B.D., Mortensen, P.B., Nuytemans, M. and Walgrave, S. (2009) ‘Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective’, American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 603–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D. and Macleod, M.C. (2000) ‘The evolution of legislative jurisdictions’, Journal of Politics 62(2): 321–49. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S. and Greene, Z. (2016) ‘Looking for the party? The effects of partisan change on issue attention in UK Acts of Parliament’, European Political Science Review 8(01): 49–72. doi: 10.1017/S175577391400040X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., John, P. and Jennings, W. (2011) ‘Keeping party programmes on track: the transmission of the policy agendas of executive speeches to legislative outputs in the United Kingdom’, European Political Science Review 3(03): 395–417. doi: 10.1017/S1755773910000433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocquillon, P. and Dobbels, M. (2014) ‘An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and Commission relations in legislative agenda setting’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(1): 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan, D. (2015) ‘Energy policy: sharp challenges and rising ambitions’, in H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack and A.R. Young (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 344–66.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983) ‘Party competition – selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data’, in H. Daalder and P. Mair (eds), Western European Party Systems. Continuity & Change, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 267–305.
   Google Scholar
• Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Palau, A.M., and Muñoz Márquez, L.M. (2014) ‘Policy promises and government activites in Spain’, in C. Green-Pedersen and S. Walgrave (eds), Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems. A Comparative Approach, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (2006) ‘The European Commission. The European executive between continuity and change’, in J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, 3rd ed., Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 96–117.
   Google Scholar
• Cini, M. (1996) The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation, and Culture in the EU Administration, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Citi, M. and Rhodes, M. (2007) ‘New forms of governance in the European Union’, in K.E. Jørgensen, M.A. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds), The Sage Handbook of European Union Politics, London: Sage, pp. 463–82.
   Google Scholar
• de Schoutheete, P. (2012) ‘The European Council and the Community Method’, Policy Paper no. 56, Paris: Notre Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont, F. (2012) The Changing Role of the European Council in the Institutional Framework of the European Union: Consequences for the European Integration Process, Mortsel: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. (2015) Which European Union? Europe After the Euro Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häge, F.M. (2011) ‘The European Union policy-making dataset’, European Union Politics 12(3): 455–77. doi: 10.1177/1465116511398739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. (2010) ‘The dynamics of agenda convergence and the paradox of competitiveness in presidential campaigns’, Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 594–611. doi: 10.1177/1065912909331426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. and Høyland, B. (2011) The Political System of the European Union, 3rd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. and Quaglia, L. (2009) ‘European perspectives on the global financial crisis: introduction’, Journal of Common Market Studies 47(5): 939–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegen, M. and Mérand, F. (2014) ‘Constructive ambiguity: comparing the EU’s energy and defence policies’, West European Politics 37(1): 182–203. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.818325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., Bevan, S., Timmermans, A., Breeman, G., Brouard, S., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Green-Pedersen, C., John, P., Mortensen, P.B. and Palau, A.M. (2011) ‘Effects of the core functions of government on the diversity of executive agendas’, Comparative Political Studies 44(8): 1001–30. doi: 10.1177/0010414011405165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R. (2005) The Politics of Attention. How Government Prioritizes Problems, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R. (2012) ‘From there to here: punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing’, Policy Studies Journal 40(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B.D., Baumgartner, F.R., Breunig, C., Wlezien, C., Soroka, S.N., Foucault, M., François, A., Green-Pedersen, C., Koski, C. and John, P. (2009a) ‘A general empirical law of public budgets: a comparative analysis’, American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 855–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B.D., Larsen-Price, H. and Wilkerson, J. (2009b) ‘Representation and American governing institutions’, The Journal of Politics 71(01): 277. doi: 10.1017/S002238160809018X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S. and Delreux, T. (2014) The Foreign Policy of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Law, R.B. (2012) ‘Congress’ Intersections with the executive branch and public opinion’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, J., Bevan, S. and Baumgartner, F.R. (2015) ‘Popular presidents can affect congressional attention, for a little while’, Policy Studies Journal 43(1): 22–43. doi: 10.1111/psj.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltby, T. (2013) ‘European Union energy policy integration: a case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism’, Energy Policy 55 (April): 435–44. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P.B. (2010) ‘Political attention and public policy: a study of how agenda setting matters’, Scandinavian Political Studies 33(4): 356–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P.B., Green-Pedersen, C., Breeman, G., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Jennings, W., John, P., Palau, A.M. and Timmermans, A. (2011) ‘Comparing government agendas: executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark’, Comparative Political Studies 44(8): 973–1000. doi: 10.1177/0010414011405162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher, J.S. and Trubek, D.M. (2003) ‘Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU social policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(1): 63–88. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourlon-Druol, E. (2014) ‘More than a prestigious spokesperson: the role of summits and the European Council in European Political Cooperation, 1969–1981′, in F. Foret and Y. Rittelmeyer (eds), The European Council and European Governance. The Commanding Heights of the EU, London: Routledge, pp. 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Peers, S. (2011) ‘Mission accomplished? EU justice and home Affairs law after the Treaty of Lisbon’, Common Market Law Review 48(3): 661–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G. (1994) ‘Agenda-setting in the European Community’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(1): 9–26. doi: 10.1080/13501769408406945
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. (2012) ‘The College of Commissioners’, in J. Peterson and M. Shackleton (eds), The Institutions of the European Union, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J.R. (1996) ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study’, American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825–50. doi: 10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’, International Organization 51(1): 99–134. doi: 10.1162/002081897550311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2009) Agenda-Setting in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2010) ‘Venue shifts and policy change in EU fisheries policy’, Marine Policy 34(1): 36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S. (2011) ‘Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 927–43. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.599960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S. and Rhinard, M. (2006) ‘Crashing and creeping: agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(7): 1119–32. doi: 10.1080/13501760600924233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2012) ‘Europe's deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 161–78. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.609743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2014) The European Council and the Council. New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. (2007) ‘Challenging the Commission's right of initiative? Conditions for institutional change and stability’, West European Politics 30(2): 244–64. doi: 10.1080/01402380701239707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout, T.N. and Mellen, R. (2007) ‘Does the media agenda reflect the candidates’ agenda?’, The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12(2): 44–62. doi: 10.1177/1081180X07299799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittelmeyer, Y. (2014) ‘The institutional consecration of the European Council: symbolism beyond formal texts’, in F. Foret and Y. Rittelmeyer (eds), The European Council and European Governance: The Commanding Heights of the EU, London: Routledge, pp. 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B. and Jones, M. (2002) ‘Regulating human genetics: the changing politics of biotechnology governance in the European Union’, Health, Risk & Society 4(3): 325–40. doi: 10.1080/1369857021000016669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, K. (2015) ‘Exporting the energy acquis: the external agenda shaping power of the EU’, in J. Tosun, S. Biesenbender and K. Schulze (eds), Energy Policy Making in the EU. Building the Agenda, London: Springer, pp. 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman, L. and Buell, E.H. (2004) ‘Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in US presidential campaigns, 1960–2000′, American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 650–61. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00093.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, A. and Breeman, G. (2014) ‘The policy agenda in multiparty government: coalition agreements and legislative activity in the Netherlands’, in C. Green-Pedersen and S. Walgrave (eds), Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems. A Comparative Approach, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 86–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2015) ‘Regulating hydraulic fracturing: the effects of issue redefinition’, in J. Tosun, S. Biesenbender and K. Schulze (eds), Energy Policy Making in the EU. Building the Agenda, London: Springer, pp. 225–44.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F. and Ripoll Servent, A. (eds) (2015) Policy change in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: How EU Institutions Matter, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Umbach, F. (2010) ‘Global energy security and the implications for the EU’, Energy Policy 38(3): 1229–40. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. and Tresch, A. (2012) ‘The associative dimension of issue ownership’, Public Opinion Quarterly 76(4): 771–82. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weale, A., Pridham, G., Cini, M., Konstadakopulos, D., Porter, M. and Flynn, B. (2000) Environmental Governance in Europe: An Ever Closer Ecological Union? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werts, J. (2008) The European Council, London: John Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Westlake, M. and Galloway, D. (2004) The Council of the European Union, 3rd ed., London: John Harper.
   Google Scholar