Good intentions and Matthew effects: access biases in participation in active labour market policies

References

• Abrassart, A. (2013) ‘Cognitive skills matter: the employment disadvantage of low-educated workers in comparative Perspective’, European Sociological Review 29(4): 707–19. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcs049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrassart, A. and Bonoli, G. (2015) ‘Availability, cost or culture? obstacles to childcare services for low-income families’, Journal of Social Policy 44(4): 787–806. doi: 10.1017/S0047279415000288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K. (2007) ‘Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(6): 905–32. doi: 10.1080/13501760701497923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, D., Bonoli, G. and Fossati, F. (2017) ‘Why do immigrants have longer periods of unemployment? Swiss evidence’, International Migration 55(1): 157–74. doi: 10.1111/imig.12309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, D. and Fossati, F. (2016) ‘Efficiency or equality : immigrants’ access bias to active labour market policies’, Paper presented at the nccr-on the move summer school meauring discrimination, University of Neuchâtel.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2010) ‘The political economy of active labor-market policy’, Politics & Society 38(4): 435–57. doi: 10.1177/0032329210381235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon, B. (2011) ‘The paradox of the social investment state: growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era’, Journal of European Social Policy 21(5): 432–49. doi: 10.1177/0958928711418856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, D., Kluve, J. and Weber, A. (2010) ‘Active labour market policy evaluations: a meta-analysis’, The Economic Journal 120: F452–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleeck, H., Huybrechs, J. and Cantillon, B. (1983) Het Mattüseffect, Antwerpen: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A. (2005) ‘Labor markets, inequality, and change: a european perspective’, Work and Occupations 32(2): 119–39. doi: 10.1177/0730888405274511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fertig, M. and Osiander, C. (2012) ‘Selektivität beim Zugang in Weiterbildungsmaßnahmen’, IAB Discussion Paper 19: 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, J. (1998) ‘Formulating the Matthew principle: on the role of the middle classes in the welfare state’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 7(1): 42–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1998.tb00274.x
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D.H., Michalopoulos, C. and Robins, P.K. (2003) ‘A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 57(1): 31–53. doi: 10.1177/001979390305700102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A. and Cheung, S.Y. (2007) ‘The comparative study of ethnic minority disadvantage’, in A. Heath and S.Y. Cheung (eds), Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J.J. (2006) ‘Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children’, Science 312: 1900–002. doi: 10.1126/science.1128898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J.J. and Smith, J.A. (2004) ‘The determinants of participation in a social program: evidence from a prototypical job training program’, Journal of Labor Economics 22(2): 243–98. doi: 10.1086/381250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Y. and Ranci, C. (2017) ‘Is every country fit for social investment? Italy as an adverse case’, Journal of European Social Policy 27(1): 90–104. doi: 10.1177/0958928716673314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluve, J. (2010) ‘The effectiveness of European active labor market programs’, Labour Economics 17(6): 904–18. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koning, P. and Heinrich, C.J. (2013) ‘Cream-Skimming, parking and other intended and unintended effects of high-powered, performance-based Contracts’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32(3): 461–83. doi: 10.1002/pam.21695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (1982) The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services, London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. (1968) ‘The matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered’, Science 159(3810): 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. and Stephens, J.D. (2012) ‘Do social investment policies produce more and better jobs?’, in N. Morel, B. Palier, and J. Palme (eds), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?: Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 205–34.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2015) ‘Employment and labour market statistics’, available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/data/oecd-employment-and-labour-market-statistics/labour-market-programmes-expenditure-and-participants_data-00312-en?isPartOf=/content/datacollection/lfs-data-en (accessed 19 February 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Pavolini, E. and Van Lancker, W. (2017) ‘Matthew effects in child care: looking for micro and macro factors’, Journal of European Public Policy doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1401108.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. (2015) ‘Matthew effect in training interventions for disadvantaged unemployed youth? A street-level bureaucracy analysis’, Paper presented at conference street level research in the employment and social policy area, Alborg University, 18–19, November.
   Google Scholar
• Schlanser, R. (2011) Qui utilise les crèches en Suisse ? Logiques sociales du recours pour la petite enfance, Lausanne: Cahier de l’IDHEAP 264.
   Google Scholar
• Solga, H. (2002) ‘“Stigmatization by negative selection”: explaining less-educated people’s decreasing employment opportunities’, European Sociological Review 18(2): 159–78. doi: 10.1093/esr/18.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, W. (2013) ‘Putting the child-centred investment strategy to the test: evidence for the EU27’, European Journal of Social Security 15(1): 4–27. doi: 10.1177/138826271301500103
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, W. and Ghysels, J. (2012) ‘Who benefits? The social distribution of subsidized childcare in Sweden and flanders’, Acta Sociologica 55(2): 125–42. doi: 10.1177/0001699311433428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, O. and Wang, C. (2015) ‘Social investment and poverty reduction: a comparative analysis across fifteen European countries’, Journal of Social Policy 44(3): 611–38. doi: 10.1017/S0047279415000070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar