Public demand for social investment: new supporting coalitions for welfare state reform in Western Europe?

References

• Ansell, B.W. (2010) From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, N. (2012) Economics of the Welfare State, Fifth Edition, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., de la Porte, C. and Jacobsson, K. (2017) ‘Labour market policy under conditions of permanent austerity: any sign of social investment?’, Social Policy & Administration 51(2): 367–388. doi: 10.1111/spol.12292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H. and Kriesi, H. (2015) The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2007) ‘Time matters: postindustrialization, new social risks, and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495–520. doi: 10.1177/0010414005285755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2010) ‘The political economy of active labor-market policy’, Politics and Society 38(4): 435–457. doi: 10.1177/0032329210381235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2013) The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. and Liechti, F. (2018). ‘Good intentions and Matthew effects: access biases in participation in active labour market policies’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 894–911.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R. (2012) ‘Inequality and the political economy of education: an analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy 22(3): 219–240. doi: 10.1177/0958928712440200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R. and Garritzmann, J.L. (2017a) ‘Academic, vocational, or general? An analysis of public opinion towards education policies with evidence from a new comparative survey’, Journal of European Social Policy 27(4): 373–386. doi: 10.1177/0958928717728713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R. and Garritzmann, J.L. (2017b) ‘Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states: evidence from a new comparative Survey’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(6): 871–889. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R., and Neimanns, E. (2017) ‘Conflictive preferences towards social investments and transfers in mature welfare states: The cases of unemployment benefits and childcare provision’, Journal of European Social Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716684302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R., Goerres, A. and Weschle, S. (2009) ‘Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 195–212. doi: 10.1177/0958928709104736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R., Garritzmann, J.L., Neimanns, E. and Nezi, R. (2017) ‘Investing in education in Europe: evidence from a new survey of public opinion’, Journal of European Social Policy. doi:10.1177/0958928717700562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M.R., de la Porte, C., Garritzmann, J.L. and Pavolini, E. (2018). ‘The future of the social investment state: politics, policies, and outcomes’ , Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 801–809.
   Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C. and Natali, D. (2018). ‘Agents of institutional change in EU policy: the social investment moment’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 828–843.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) ‘A child-centred social investment strategy’, in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Why we Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–65.
   Google Scholar
• Fossati, F. and Häusermann, S. (2014) ‘Social policy preferences and party choice in the 2011 Swiss elections’, Swiss Political Science Review 20(4): 590–611. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J.L. (2015) ‘Attitudes towards student support: how positive feedback-effects prevent change in the four worlds of student Finance’, Journal of European Social Policy 25(2): 139–158. doi: 10.1177/0958928715573478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J.L. (2016) The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance. The Politics of Tuition Fees and Subsidies in OECD Countries 1945–2015, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J.L., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Zollinger, C. (2017) ‘WoPSI - the world politics of social investment: an international research project to explain variance in social investment agendas and social investment reforms across countries and world regions’, LIEPP working paper: 64, SciencesPo, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Goerres, A. and Tepe, M. (2010) ‘Age-based self-interest, intergenerational solidarity and the welfare state: a comparative analysis of older people's attitudes towards public childcare in 12 OECD countries’, European Journal of Political Research 49(6): 818–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01920.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. (2018). ‘The multidimensional politics of social investment in conservative welfare regimes: family policy reform between social transfers and social investment’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 862–877.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. and Kriesi, H. (2015) ‘What do voters want? dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice’, in P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, and H. Kriesi (eds), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–230.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., Kurer, T. and Schwander, H. (2015) ‘High-skilled outsiders? labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences’, Socio-Economic Review 13(2): 235–58. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwu026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2013) Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2015) ‘The quiet paradigm revolution of social investment’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22(2): 242–256. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxv009
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2018). ‘Social investment as a policy paradigm’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 810–827.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, T.L., Monroe, P.A., Garand, J.C. and Burts, D.C. (1995) ‘Explaining public opinion toward government spending on child care’, Family Relations 44(1): 37–45. doi: 10.2307/584739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2002) ‘Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?’, Comparative Political Studies 35: 965–89. doi: 10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kananen, J., Taylor-Gooby, P. and Larsen, T.P. (2006) ‘Public attitudes and new social risk reform’, in A. Klaus and G. Bonoli (eds), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks, New York: Routledge, pp. 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. (1995) Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. and Rehm, P. (2015) ‘Party alignments: change and continuity’, in P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt and H. Kriesi (eds), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Mischke, M. (2014) Public Attitudes Towards Family Policies in Europe. Linking Institutional Context and Public Opinion, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State: Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavolini, E. and Van Lancker, W. (2018). ‘The Matthew effect in childcare use: a matter of policies or preferences?’ Journal of European Public Policy 25(6): 878–893.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, D. (2005) ‘Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: the challenge to social democratic parties’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 61–74. doi: 10.1017/S000305540505149X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J., Billiet, J. and Cambré, B. (2003) ‘Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34(6): 702–722. doi: 10.1177/0022022103257070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar