References
- Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2018) ‘From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 83–108. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281
- de Vries, C.E. (2017) ‘The cosmopolitan-parochial divide: changing patterns of party and electoral competition in the Netherlands and beyond’, Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1339730
- Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
- Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018) ‘Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: lipset, rokkan, and the transnational cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–35. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
- Ioannou, D., Leblond, P. and Niemann, A. (2015) ‘European integration and the crisis: practice and theory’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(2): 155–76. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.994979
- Kelemen, R. D. and Blauberger, M. (2017) ‘Introducing the debate: European Union safeguards against member states’ democratic backsliding’, Journal of European Public Policy 24(3): 317–20. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1229356
- Parker, O. (2016) ‘Teaching (dissident) theory in crisis European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 54(1): 37–52. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12333