Victims of their own success abroad? Why the withdrawal of US transparency rules is hindered by diffusion to the EU and Canada

References

• Aaronson, S.A. (2011) ‘Limited partnership: business, government, civil society, and the public in the extractive industries transparency initiative (EITI)’, Public Administration and Development 31: 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anadarko (2017), Providing for today, innovating for tomorrow: 2016 Anadarko annual report, available at https://www.anadarko.com/content/documents/apc/Operations/2016-Annual-Report.pdf (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Bildfell, C. (2016) ‘The extractive industries transparen’cy measures Act: critical perspectives’, McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law 12(2): 233–274.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., and Risse, T. (2012) ‘From Europeanisation to diffusion: introduction’, West European Politics 35(1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. (2012) ‘The Brussels effect’, Northwestern University Law Review 107(1): 1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market power Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(5): 682–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Baere, G., and Ryngaert, C. (2013) ‘The ECJ’s judgment in Air transport association of America and the international legal context of the EU’s climate change Policy’, European Foreign Affairs Review 18(3): 389–410.
   Google Scholar
• Devon Energy (2017a) 2016 letter to shareholders and form 10-k, available at http://s2.q4cdn.com/462548525/files/doc_financials/Annual/DVN-2016-10-K-Letter-to-Shareholders.pdf (accessed 16 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, N.L., and Ryngaert, C. (2017) ‘Provocative climate protection: EU ‘extraterritorial’ regulation of maritime emissions’, International & Comparative Law Quarterly 66(2): 295–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EITI (2003) Statement of principles and agreed actions, available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/eitidraftreportstatement.pdf (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• EITI (2013) Canada commits to reporting requirements, available at https://eiti.org/news/canada-commits-to-reporting-requirements (accessed 13 January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• EITI (2017) Country status against the EITI rules (2007-2016), available at https://eiti.org/countries-archive (accessed 10 April 2017).
   Google Scholar
• EOG Resources (2017) 2016 annual report, available at http://www.eogresources.com/investors/reports/2016/EOGR_2016_Annual_Report.pdf (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011a) Commission staff working paper part II – Impact assessment for financial disclosures on a country by country basis, available at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/sme_accounting/review_directives/20111025-impact-assessment-part-2_en.pdf (accessed 12 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011b) Proposal for Directive on transparency requirements for listed companies and proposals on country by country reporting – frequently asked questions, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-734_en.htm (accessed 10 December 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011c) Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52011PC0684 (accessed 10 December 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013) New disclosure requirements for the extractive industry and loggers of primary forest in the Accounting (and Transparency) Directives (Country by Country Reporting) – Frequently asked questions, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-541_en.htm (accessed 26 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2014) Briefing: the extractive industries transparency initiative: state of play, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2014/140758/LDM_BRI(2014)140758_REV1_EN.pdf (accessed 15 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, W. (1995) ‘Comparative jurisprudence (II): the logic of legal transplants’, American Journal of Comparative Law 43: 489–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52(4): 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firger, D.M. (2009) ‘Transparency and the natural resource curse: examining the new extraterritorial information forcing rules in the Dodd-Frank wall street reform Act of 2010’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 41(4): 1043–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes (2017) World's 25 biggest oil & gas companies In 2017, available at https://www.forbes.com/pictures/591c6a1fa7ea434078d41870/china-petroleum--chemical/#2b11d392726c (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, P., Howie, K., and Ross, A. (2015) ‘Energy superpower in waiting: new pipeline development in Canada, social license and recent federal energy reforms’, Alberta Law Review 53(2): 419–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S., and Hulme, D. (2011) ‘International norm dynamics and the end of poverty: understanding the millennium development goals’, Global Governance 17: 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G8 (2004), Fighting corruption and improving transparency, available at http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/2004seaisland/corruption.html (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2004) ‘What is a case study and what is it good for?’ American Political Science Review 98(2): 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Affairs Canada (2018) Canada’s enhanced corporate social responsibility strategy to strengthen Canada’s extractive sector abroad, available at http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/other-autre/csr-strat-rse.aspx?lang=eng (accessed 12 January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J.P. (1999) ‘Extraterritoriality in US and EU antitrust enforcement’, Antitrust Law Journal 67: 159–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, H.N. (2013) ‘After the norm cascade: NGO mission expansion and the coalition for the international criminal Court’, Global Governance 19: 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamner, K.J. (2001) ‘The globalization of law: international merger control and competition law in the United States, the European Union, Latin America and China’, Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 11(2): 385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Hess Corporation (2017) 2016 annual report, available at http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9NjY3NTM4fENoaWxkSUQ9Mzc1Mzg0fFR5cGU9MQ==&t=1 (accessed 14 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. (2008) ‘Assessing the complex evolution of norms: the rise of international election monitoring’, International Organization 62(2): 221–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleizen, B. (2015) Externalizing EU Law, policy and values – Europe’s global identity, mechanisms of rule transfer and case studies on illegal logging in Bosnia and Herzegovina, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2706564 (accessed 1 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2014) ‘The power of functionalist extension: how EU rules travel’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(6): 885–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., and Schimmelfennig, F. (2009) ‘EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, T., and Burilkov, A. (2016) ‘Institutional pioneers in world politics: regional institution building and the influence of the European Union’, European Journal of International Relations, http://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354066116674261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listhaug, O. (2005) ‘Oil wealth dissatisfaction and political trust in Norway: a resource curse?’ West European Politics 28(4): 834–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, D.M. (2011) ‘The Dodd-Frank Act’s specialized corporate disclosure: using the securities laws to address public policy issues’, Journal of Business & Technology Law 6(2): 327–355.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, R.H. (1997) ‘The origin, development, and regulation of norms’, Michigan Law Review 96(2): 338–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, K.E., Mudambi, R. and Narula, R. (2010) ‘Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness’, Journal of Management Studies 48(2): 235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milin, Z. (2016) ‘Mapping recent developments in transparency of extractive industries’, Business and Human Rights Journal 1(2): 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J.M. (2003) ‘A typology of legal transplants: using sociology, legal history and Argentine examples to explain the transplant process’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 51(4): 839–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T.M. (1989) ‘The politics of bureaucratic structure’, in Chubb, J.E. & Peterson, P.E. (eds.) Can the Government Govern?, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, pp. 267–329.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Canada (2017) Substitution process and determination, available at from: http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mining-materials/estma/18196 (accessed 23 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Occidental Petroleum Corporation (2017), Performance innovation growth: Occidental Petroleum Corporation 2016 Annual Report, available at http://www.oxypublications.com/annualreport/PDF/2016/OXY_2016_AR_WEB.pdf (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Painter, R., Dunham, D., and Quackenbos, E. (2011) ‘When courts and congress don’t say what they mean: initial reactions to Morrison v. National Australia Bank and to the extraterritorial jurisdiction provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act’, Minnesota Journal of International Law 20(1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R., and Neumayer, E. (2012) ‘Does the ‘California effect’ operate across borders? Trading- and investing-up in automobile emission standards’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2014) ‘Extraterritoriality and territorial extension in EU law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 62(1): 87–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEC (2015) Enhancing the transparency of resource extraction revenue payments, available at https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/disclosure-of-payments-by-resource-extraction-issuers.html (accessed 22 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• SEC (2016) Disclosure of payments by resource extraction issuers, available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2016/34-78167.pdf (accessed 23 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘Transnational politics, international relations theory, and human rights’, PS: Political Science and Politics 31(3): 516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B.K., and Andrews, N. (2015) ‘Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the extractive industries transparency initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Libera’, Resources Policy 45: 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B.K., Walter, G., Van de Graaf, T., and Andrews, N. (2016) ‘Energy governance, transnational rules, and the resource curse: exploring the effectiveness of the extractive industries transparency Initiative’, World Development 83: 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista (n.a.) Leading public oil companies worldwide based on daily production as of 2015 (in barrels of oil per day), available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/280705/leading-oil-companies-worldwide-based-on-daily-oil-production-2012/ (accessed 4 March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Treasury (2017) A financial system that creates economic opportunities: capital markets, available at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Documents/A-Financial-System-That-Creates-Economic-Opportunities-Asset_Management-Insurance.pdf (accessed 15 December 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Van Alsenoy, B., and Koekkoek, M. (2015) ‘Internet and jurisdiction after Google Spain: the extraterritorial reach of the ‘right to be delisted’’, International Data Privacy Law 5(2): 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (1997) ‘Trading up and governing across: transnational governance and environmental protection’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 556–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House (2017) President trump takes action to get Washington out of the way, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-trump-takes-action-get-washington-way/ (accessed 19 January 2017).
   Google Scholar