The Watchdog or the Mandarin? Assessing the impact of the Directorates General on the EU legislative process

References

• Ballmann, A., Epstein, D. and O’Halloran, S. (2002) ‘Delegation, comitology, and the separation of powers in the European Union’, International Organization 56(3): 551–574. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendor, J. and Meirowitz, A. (2004) ‘Spatial models of delegation’, American Political Science Review 98(2): 293–310. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404001157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.J. (1975) ‘Aggregation of preferences’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 89(3): 456–469. doi: 10.2307/1885263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, R.L., McCubbins, M.D. and Weingast, B.R. (1989) ‘A theory of political control and agency discretion’, American Journal of Political Science 33(3): 588–611. doi: 10.2307/2111064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (1997) ‘Tensions of European governance: politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(1): 73–90. doi: 10.1080/135017697344244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (2002) ‘Relations between the European Commission and the council secretariat : the administrative complex of European governance introduction’, Politique Européenne 5(1): 11. doi: 10.3917/poeu.005.0011
   Google Scholar
• Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (2011) EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, New York: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, C. (2000) ‘Institutional reform and co-decision in the European Union’, Constitutional Political Economy 11(1): 41–57. doi: 10.1023/A:1009070016507
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, C. and Hix, S. (2011) ‘Treaty reform and the Commission’s appointment and policy-making role in the European Union’, European Union Politics 12(3): 291–314. doi: 10.1177/1465116511409601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2016) ‘ Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies’, Development Version, available at http://www.parlgov.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D. and O’Halloran, S. (1994) ‘Administrative procedures, information, and agency discretion’, American Journal of Political Science 38(4): 697–722. doi: 10.2307/2111603
   Google Scholar
• Franchino, F. (2007) The Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• From, J. (2002) ‘Decision-making in a complex environment: a sociological institutionalist analysis of competition policy decision-making in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(2): 219–237. doi: 10.1080/13501760110120237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, S. and Høyland, B. (2008) ‘Parties in the council?’ Journal of European Public Policy 15(8): 1205–1221. doi: 10.1080/13501760802407714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M. (2015) ‘Politicization of the European Commission: when, how, and with what impact?’, in M.W. Bauer and J. Trondal (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2013) ‘Linking agenda setting to coordination structures: bureaucratic politics inside the European Commission’, Journal of European Integration 35(4): 425. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2012.703663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J. and Rauh, C. (2014) Which Policy for Europe?: Power and Conflict Inside the European Commission. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2006) ‘Dimensions of politics in the European Parliament’, American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2005) ‘Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization: a case study of the European Commission’, International Organization 59(4): 425–898. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2012) ‘The European Commission in the 21st Century. Core Beliefs on EU Governance’, KFG Working Paper Series, 38: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, B., Warntjen, A. and Wonka, A. (2005) ‘Built on quicksand? A decade of procedural spatial models on EU legislative decision-making’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(3): 592–606. doi: 10.1080/13501760500091950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joana, J. and Smith, A. (2004) ‘The politics of collegiality: the non-portfolio dimension’, in A. Smith (ed.), Politics and the European Commission. Actors, Interdependence, Legitimacy, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2017) ‘What’s new? A first appraisal of the Juncker commission’, European Political Science 16(1): 14–33. doi: 10.1057/eps.2015.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., et al. (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-first Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1996) Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, W.G. and Mullahy, J. (2001) ‘Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?’, Journal of Health Economics 20(4): 461–494. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M.D., Noll, R.G. and Weingast, B.R. (1989) ‘Structure and process, politics and policy: administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies’ Virginia Law Review 75(2): 431–482. doi: 10.2307/1073179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European community’, International Organization 51(01): 99–134. doi: 10.1162/002081897550311
   Google Scholar
• Roger, L., Otjes, S. and van der Veer, H. (2017) ‘The financial crisis and the European Parliament: an analysis of the two-pack legislation’, European Union Politics 18(4): 560–580. doi: 10.1177/1465116517716311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2003) ‘Why European commissioners matter’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 41(1): 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (2008). ‘National actors in international Organizations’, Comparative Political Studies 41(2): 169–192. doi: 10.1177/0010414006295661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2004) ‘Political dynamics of the parallel administration of the European Commission’. in A. Smith (ed.), Politics and the European Commission. Actors, Interdependence, Legitimacy, London: Routledge, pp. 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. (2000) ‘Legislative politics in the European Union’, European Union Politics 1(1): 9–36. doi: 10.1177/1465116500001001002
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, R.W. and Meier, K.J. (1998) ‘Principal-agent models: an expansion?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2): 173–202. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377
   Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013) The Normalization of the European Commission: Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. (2007) ‘Technocratic and independent? The appointment of European Commissioners and its policy implications’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 169–189. doi: 10.1080/13501760601122241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. (2008) ‘Decision-making dynamics in the European Commission: partisan, national or sectoral?’ Journal of European Public Policy 15(8): 1145–1163. doi: 10.1080/13501760802407656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar